Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 2006 Oct 7;333(7571):756. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7571.756

Chelation therapy and autism

Yashwant Sinha 1,2,3, Natalie Silove 1,2,3, Katrina Williams 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1592402  PMID: 17023484

Editor—More children are being diagnosed as having autism, and there are currently no treatments based on aetiology.1 Consequently, a number of controversial, unproved, alternative treatments have arisen. The recent death of an autistic child after a medication error with intravenous chelation therapy has brought one purported aetiology based treatment to international attention.2 The 5 year old child reportedly died from hypocalcaemia after receiving edetate disodium instead of edetate calcium disodium.3

Approved uses for chelation therapy include heavy metal poisoning in adults and children, although it has been used in an off-label manner for conditions such as coronary artery disease and Alzheimer's disease.4 Practitioners are using a variety of chelation agents and routes of administration for children with autism spectrum disorders, with oral dimercaprosuccinic acid, also known as succimer, probably the most common. Several of the agents are not approved for use or are given through an unlicensed route of administration such as rectal or transdermal.5

Available information about current use of chelation therapy in autism is scant, and what exists implies that inappropriate agents, routes, or dosage schedules of administration are being used as autism treatments. In addition, there is no compelling evidence to suggest that chelation therapy is an effective treatment for autism. A review of Medline (1966 to April 2006) and Premedline did not yield any relevant reviews or randomised controlled trials of chelation therapy for autism spectrum disorder.

Serious concern should arise about the ongoing use of chelation therapy in children with autism at this time, especially when the side effects of appropriate administration are well reported, a death has occurred with an error of administration, and the treatment incurs a cost for the families. The potential for vulnerable families to seek this as a promised miracle cure raises ethical and professional practice questions that need international consideration.

We thank Andis Graudins for his valuable review of the manuscript.

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Fombonne E, Simmons H, Ford T, Meltzer H, Goodman R. Prevalence of pervasive developmental disorders in the British nationwide survey of child mental health. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40: 820-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Woznicki K. British boy dies after chelation therapy for autism. MedPage Today. Aug 26, 2005. www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/AlternativeMedicine/tb/1616 (accessed 10 Aug 2006).
  • 3.Kane K. Drug error, not chelation therapy, killed boy, expert says. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Jan 18, 2006. www.postgazette.com/pg/06018/639721.stm (accessed 10 Aug 2006).
  • 4.National Autistic Society. Chelation therapy. London: National Autistic Society. www.nas.org.uk/nas/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=459&a=7733 (accessed 10 Aug 2006).
  • 5.Autism Research Institute. Treatment options for mercury/metal toxicity in autism and related developmental disabilities: consensus position paper. San Diego: Autism Research Institute, 2005.

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES