Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1994 Apr;104(4):1209–1214. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.4.1209

Action Spectra of Photosystems I and II in State 1 and State 2 in Intact Sugar Maple Leaves.

K Veeranjaneyulu 1, R M Leblanc 1
PMCID: PMC159282  PMID: 12232159

Abstract

Photochemical activity, measured as energy storage of photosystems I (PSI) and II (PSII) together and individually, is studied in sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) leaves in the spectral range between 400 and 700 nm in state 1 and state 2. Total photochemical activity remains the same in both state 1 and state 2 between 580 and 700 nm, but it is lower in state 2 between 400 and 580 nm. Both PSI and PSII activities change significantly during the state transition due to the migration of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein complex of PSII (LHCII). In the action spectra of PSI and PSII, peak positions vary depending on the association or dissociation of LHCII, except for the peak at 470 nm in the PSII spectrum. PSII activity is about 3 times higher than or equal to PSI in state 1 or state 2, respectively, over most of the spectrum except in the blue and far-red regions. At 470 nm, PSII activity is 8 or 1.6 times higher than PSI in state 1 or state 2, respectively. The amplitude of LHCII coupling-induced change is the same in both PSI and PSII between 580 and 700 nm, but it is less in PSI than in PSII between 400 and 580 nm, which explains the lower photochemical activity of the leaf in state 2 than in state 1. This may be due to a decrease in energy transfer efficiency of carotenoids to chlorophylls in LHCII when it is associated with PSI.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (640.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bonaventura C., Myers J. Fluorescence and oxygen evolution from Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969;189(3):366–383. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(69)90168-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carpentier R., Larue B., Leblanc R. M. Photoacoustic spectroscopy of Anacystis nidulans. I. Effect of sample thickness on the photoacoustic signal. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1983 Apr 15;222(2):403–410. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(83)90537-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cha Y., Mauzerall D. C. Energy storage of linear and cyclic electron flows in photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1992 Dec;100(4):1869–1877. doi: 10.1104/pp.100.4.1869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark J. B., Lister G. R. Photosynthetic action spectra of trees: I. Comparative photosynthetic action spectra of one deciduous and four coniferous tree species as related to photorespiration and pigment complements. Plant Physiol. 1975 Feb;55(2):401–406. doi: 10.1104/pp.55.2.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HOCH G., MARTIN I. TWO LIGHT REACTIONS IN TPN REDUCTION BY SPINACH CHLOROPLASTS. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1963 Sep;102:430–438. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(63)90251-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hodges M., Barber J. State 1-State 2 Transitions in a Unicellular Green Algae : Analysis of In Vivo Chlorophyll Fluorescence Induction Curves in the Presence of 3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-1, 1-dimethylurea (DCMU). Plant Physiol. 1983 Aug;72(4):1119–1122. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.4.1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Joliot P., Joliot A., Kok B. Analysis of the interactions between the two photosystems in isolated chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1968 Apr 2;153(3):635–652. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(68)90191-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Murata N. Control of excitation transfer in photosynthesis. I. Light-induced change of chlorophyll a fluorescence in Porphyridium cruentum. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969 Feb 25;172(2):242–251. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(69)90067-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES