Abstract
It has long been debated whether changes in Ca2+ are involved in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. We have now investigated the effect of insulin on the global free myoplasmic Ca2+ concentration and the near-membrane free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]mem) in intact, single skeletal muscle fibers from mice by using fluorescent Ca2+ indicators. Insulin has no effect on the global free myoplasmic Ca2+ concentration. However, insulin increases [Ca2+]mem by ≈70% and the half-maximal increase in [Ca2+]mem occurs at an insulin concentration of 110 microunits per ml. The increase in [Ca2+]mem by insulin persists when sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release is inhibited but is lost by perfusing the fiber with a low Ca2+ medium or by addition of L-type Ca2+ channel inhibitors. Thus, insulin appears to stimulate Ca2+ entry into muscle cells via L-type Ca2+ channels. Wortmannin, which inhibits insulin-mediated activation of glucose transport in isolated skeletal muscle, also inhibits the insulin-mediated increase in [Ca2+]mem. These data demonstrate a new facet of insulin signaling and indicate that insulin-mediated increases in [Ca2+]mem in skeletal muscle may underlie important actions of the hormone.
Insulin exerts metabolic effects on tissues and defects in insulin action are associated with the existence of numerous diseases, including non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hypertension (1). A defect in insulin-mediated glucose disposal in skeletal muscle is of particular significance because this tissue is responsible for removal of ≈90% of the glucose that disappears from the blood stream during hyperinsulinemia (2). Thus, understanding the process of insulin signaling in skeletal muscle is important. There is now considerable evidence that, subsequent to the binding of insulin to its receptor, a series of reactions involving protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, catalyzed by various protein kinases and phosphatases, occurs resulting in the metabolic effects of insulin (3). Additionally, changes in the intracellular concentrations of low molecular weight compounds (e.g., glucose 6-phosphate) (4), ions (5), and inositol phosphoglycans (3, 6) also appear to be involved in insulin signaling.
Whether insulin action involves changes in intracellular [Ca2+] is a long-standing debate (7, 8). Indirect evidence suggests that Ca2+ is involved in insulin action, particularly in glucose transport (8–10). Although one report shows that insulin increases intracellular [Ca2+] in adipocytes (11), most measurements of intracellular [Ca2+] in various cell types, including myotubes in culture, cardiac myocytes, and adipocytes, generally indicate no change in response to insulin (7, 12, 13). Therefore, it has been suggested that a minimal or permissive level of [Ca2+] is required for insulin actions (8, 9). It is surprising that the effect of insulin on intracellular [Ca2+] has not been investigated previously in this preparation, considering the importance of skeletal muscle in whole body glucose homeostasis (14). In the present study we used individual mouse skeletal muscle fibers to study the effect of insulin on global free myoplasmic calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) and near-membrane free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]mem).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials.
Insulin was from Novo-Nordisk, Copenhagen. FIP18 was from TEFLABS, Austin, TX. Indo-1 was from Molecular Probes Europe. Nifedipine and nimodipine were from Alamone Labs, Jerusalem. N,N-Dimethyltrimethylsilylamine was from Fluka, and diazoxide was from Tocris Cookson Ltd., Bristol, England. The remaining chemicals were from Sigma.
Fiber Mounting and Stimulation.
Intact, single muscle fibers were isolated from the surface of the flexor brevis muscles of adult NMRI mice and mounted as described (15). To check that fibers were viable, tetanic contractions were produced by biphasic current pulses with an amplitude of 120–150% of the contraction threshold given at a frequency of 80 Hz. The fiber length was adjusted to the length giving maximum tetanic force. Fibers were usually stimulated only at the start and end of the experiment to avoid affecting the muscle’s response to insulin application.
Solutions.
Muscle fibers were superfused with a Tyrode solution containing 125 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM Na2PO4, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 25 mM NaHCO3, and 5.5 mM glucose. Low Ca2+ solutions were prepared by replacing the CaCl2 with 4 mM MgCl2 in the above solution and then adding EGTA and calcium in appropriate amounts to give calculated free [Ca2+] of 1 or 20 nM (16). Fetal calf serum (0.2%) was added to all solutions, which were continuously bubbled with 95% O2/5% CO2 (pH 7.4). The temperature of the perfusate was 24–26°C. Insulin was added directly to the solution immediately before the experiments.
Ca2+ Measurements.
Global [Ca2+]i was measured with the fluorescent indicator Indo-1 as described (17). The indicator was pressure injected into fibers. [Ca2+]mem was measured with a membrane-associating form of Indo-1, FIP18 (see ref. 18 for additional details). This indicator could be pressure injected only when the glass of the microelectrodes was silanized with N,N-dimethyltrimethylsilylamine. After the dye was injected, fibers were left for a further 40–60 min before any measurements were made. The two dyes were excited with light at 360 ± 5 nm, and the light emitted at 405 ± 5 and 490 ± 5 nm was measured with two photomultiplier tubes. The ratio (R) of the light emitted at 405 nm to that emitted at 490 nm was translated to [Ca2+] with the equation [Ca2+] = KDβ(R − Rmin)(Rmax − R)−1, where KD is the apparent dissociation constant of the dye, β is the ratio of the 490-nm signals at very low and saturating [Ca2+], and Rmin and Rmax are the ratios at very low and at saturating [Ca2+], respectively (19). Values for KD, β, Rmin, and Rmax for Indo-1 and FIP18 were established intracellularly as described (20), with the exception that the in vitro KD of FIP18 (450 nM) was used. The peak increase in [Ca2+] during 10 min of exposure to insulin was defined as the highest value achieved during a continuous 30-s interval.
Membrane Potential Measurements.
A flat sheet containing about 15–20 muscle fibers was prepared from the flexor brevis muscles of adult NMRI mice. Fibers were penetrated with a microelectrode filled with KCl (1 M), and the potential difference between this electrode and a reference electrode filled with agar-KCl (1 M) was measured with a Geneclamp 500 amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) and displayed on an oscilloscope. In each preparation, the resting membrane potential was measured in four to six fibers in normal Tyrode solution and then after 8–20 min of exposure to 10 milliunits/ml insulin in another four to six fibers.
Statistics.
Values are presented as means ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined with Student’s paired or unpaired t tests as appropriate, and the significance level (P) was set at 0.05.
RESULTS
The initial experiments with the near-membrane Ca2+ indicator, FIP18, were performed to establish, first, that after injection the calcium-sensitive portion of the molecule was localized to the intracellular face of the sarcolemma and did not flip across the membrane to the outer surface and, second, that it responded to procedures known to elevate myoplasmic [Ca2+]. The FIP18 signal was recorded in fibers before and during exposure to 1 mM Ni2+, which is known to quench the fluorescent signal of calcium-sensitive dyes in their free and membrane-anchored forms (21). The FIP18 records shown in Fig. 1A demonstrate that, when the fiber was intact (dotted line), there was no change in the light emitted at 405 nm over a 200-s recording period, apart from a slow steady decline that was present even before application of Ni2+. In contrast, when a hole was created in the fiber with a broken microelectrode and the interior of the fiber was exposed to the bathing solution (solid line), Ni2+ caused a clear decrease in the FIP18 signal. Similar results were obtained in another three fibers. These results indicate that the Ca2+-sensitive portion of the FIP18 molecule faced the interior of the cell and did not reorientate itself across the cell membrane. In line with this, when external Ca2+ was decreased to <20 nM, there was no change in [Ca2+]mem (data not shown). Fig. 1 B–E shows the response of fibers injected with either the global Ca2+ indicator Indo-1 or FIP18 to electrical stimulation or application of caffeine, which are known to cause Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) (22). The FIP18 signal clearly increased in response to both electrical stimulation (Fig. 1B) and application of 5 mM caffeine (Fig. 1D). Noteworthy is that basal [Ca2+]mem (136 ± 26 nM, n = 15) is higher than basal [Ca2+]i (61 ± 8, n = 8), which agrees with recent results in smooth muscle cells (18). Whereas the tetanic [Ca2+] detected with the two dyes were similar ([Ca2+]i = 1.44 ± 0.15 μM, n = 7; [Ca2+]mem = 1.56 ± 0.28 μM, n = 6), the increase in response to caffeine was larger for [Ca2+]mem (140 ± 34 nM, n = 10) than for [Ca2+]i (21 ± 6 nM, n = 4).
Global [Ca2+]i averaged 61 nM before insulin exposure (see above) and did not change significantly during exposure to either 10 milliunits/ml insulin (Δ[Ca2+]i = −1.8 ± 3.6 nM, n = 4) or 100 milliunits/ml insulin (Δ[Ca2+]i = 2.5 ± 0.9 nM, n = 4) (Fig. 2A). However, 10 milliunits/ml insulin clearly increased [Ca2+]mem (Fig. 2B), with the mean ± SEM increase of individual fibers averaging 71.9 ± 22.4% (n = 15; P < 0.05) at this insulin concentration. The insulin effect was reversible if insulin exposure was less than 10 min (Fig. 2B), and the effect was concentration dependent (Fig. 2C). A half-maximal increase in [Ca2+]mem occurred at a calculated insulin concentration of 110 microunits/ml. The time course of the insulin-mediated increase of [Ca2+]mem was measured in 20 fibers, and the time to reach half of the maximum increase was 2.51 ± 0.36 min.
Because the SR is the major intracellular storage site of Ca2+ in skeletal muscle, experiments were performed to determine whether the insulin-mediated increase in [Ca2+]mem derived from the SR. Dantrolene, an inhibitor of SR Ca2+ release (23), was used to determine whether insulin altered [Ca2+]mem by affecting SR Ca2+ release. Dantrolene (50 μM) significantly decreased the resting FIP18 ratio signal. This would be in part because of a reduced leak of Ca2+ from the SR and in part because of an artifact caused by altered light emission properties that resulted in a decrease of the ratio signal below Rmin. Thus, the ratio signals in the presence of dantrolene cannot be converted into [Ca2+]mem. However, dantrolene did not block the insulin-mediated increase in FIP18 ratio, i.e., [Ca2+]mem (Fig. 3A). Similar results were obtained in a further three fibers with a mean change in the FIP18 ratio of 0.306 ± 0.112 compared with a mean change of 0.200 ± 0.116 in the absence of dantrolene, indicating that insulin does not stimulate Ca2+ release from a dantrolene-sensitive SR Ca2+ pool. Noteworthy is that, although dantrolene does not block the insulin-mediated increase in the FIP18 ratio, dantrolene does block the ability of insulin to increase the ratio above basal.
Insulin had little effect on tetanic force (Fig. 3B) and tetanic [Ca2+]i (Fig. 3C). Data from four fibers showed no significant effect of insulin (10 milliunits/ml) on either tetanic force (99.5 ± 2.2% of control) or tetanic [Ca2+]i (95.2 ± 6.5% of control). Thus, insulin does not appear to stimulate voltage-activated SR Ca2+ release. An alternative mechanism by which insulin can increase [Ca2+]mem is by inhibiting SR Ca2+ uptake. Changes of SR Ca2+ uptake can be assessed by analyzing [Ca2+]i tails after tetani, i.e., the slow, late phase of Ca2+ decay after a tetanus (17). Typical examples of the [Ca2+]i tail in the presence and absence of insulin are shown in Fig. 3D. It can be seen that insulin had no marked effect on these tails. Similar results were obtained in three other fibers in which [Ca2+]i tails were studied, and hence there is no indication of an insulin-mediated effect on SR Ca2+ uptake. Taken together, these results indicate that insulin does not increase [Ca2+]mem by altering SR function.
Subsequent experiments were aimed at determining whether the increase of [Ca2+]mem with insulin was caused by influx of Ca2+ from the extracellular fluid. The [Ca2+]mem increase with insulin was somewhat attenuated (not significant) when the extracellular [Ca2+] was reduced to 20 nM (Fig. 4). When insulin was applied at 1 nM extracellular Ca2+, the increase of [Ca2+]mem was small and significantly smaller than the increase at normal extracellular Ca2+. Thus, the insulin-mediated increase of [Ca2+]mem was reduced when the inward driving force for Ca2+ was reduced or reversed, suggesting that insulin was stimulating Ca2+ entry into muscle cells. In six fibers, 5 mM caffeine increased [Ca2+]mem by 133 ± 49 nM in the presence of 1 nM extracellular Ca2+, and this was not significantly different from the increase of 140 ± 34 nM obtained in 10 fibers exposed to the same concentration of caffeine in 1.8 mM extracellular Ca2+. Therefore, during exposure of the fiber to low extracellular Ca2+, SR still contained Ca2+ and was able to release it in sufficient quantities to bind to the membrane-bound FIP18 dye. This demonstrates that the lack of increase in [Ca2+]mem in response to insulin after removal of extracellular Ca2+ is not caused by Ca2+ depletion of SR.
To determine the mode of insulin-stimulated Ca2+ entry, the effects of either nifedipine or nimodipine, both L-type Ca2+ channel blockers (24, 25) on [Ca2+]mem were studied. L-type channels were considered because blockers of these channels inhibit insulin-mediated glucose transport in isolated skeletal muscle (24, 26). Application of these Ca2+ channel blockers significantly reduced the insulin-mediated increase in [Ca2+]mem (Fig. 4), suggesting that insulin application resulted in the opening of L-type Ca2+ channels.
Insulin has long been known to hyperpolarize skeletal muscle cells, and in agreement with this, we found that 10 milliunits/ml insulin caused a small but significant hyperpolarization averaging 3 mV (n = 26 fibers). The hyperpolarization is believed to result from increased activity of the Na-K ATPase pump (27). However, opening of the inwardly rectifying K channel that exists in skeletal muscle may also contribute. Recently, it was suggested that the KATP channel present in both pancreatic beta cells and skeletal muscle might be involved in insulin action (28). To test this hypothesis, we exposed muscle fibers to 250 μM diazoxide [a known activator of KATP channels (29)] for 5 min before addition of 10 milliunits/ml insulin. In five fibers so treated, the mean increase in [Ca2+]mem was not significantly different from the increase induced by insulin alone (Fig. 4).
Finally, the effect of wortmannin, an inhibitor of insulin- but not contraction-mediated glucose transport (30, 31), on the insulin-mediated increase of [Ca2+]mem was studied. Wortmannin significantly reduced the increase of [Ca2+]mem with insulin (Fig. 4) but had no effect on tetanic force or tetanic [Ca2+]i (data not shown).
DISCUSSION
The main result of the present study is that insulin application significantly increases the [Ca2+] close to the membrane ([Ca2+]mem) of muscle cells but has no effect on global [Ca2+]i. If insulin caused a significant uniform increase in [Ca2+]i throughout the myoplasm, this could potentially be counterproductive, because of activation of Ca2+-dependent protein kinases (e.g., phosphorylase kinase) in the cell interior, which would result in glycogenolysis and inhibition of glucose utilization (32). Insulin, on the other hand, stimulates glycogen synthesis while preventing glycogenolysis in muscle (33). Indeed, others have shown that insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes is decreased at high intracellular [Ca2+] (34), which presumably primarily reflects cytosolic [Ca2+]. Moreover, a substantial increase of [Ca2+]i would result in activation of the contractile machinery and, subsequently, contracture. The threshold for contraction in this preparation is about 200–300 nM [Ca2+]i (17). The finding that insulin increases [Ca2+]mem but not global [Ca2+]i may explain why previous investigators generally failed to detect changes in intracellular [Ca2+] after exposure to insulin.
The physiological significance of the insulin-mediated increase of [Ca2+]mem is addressed as follows. First, the insulin concentration that yielded the half-maximal increase in [Ca2+]mem was 110 microunits/ml, with saturation being achieved at ≈1,000 microunits/ml (Fig. 2C). These values are similar to those for insulin-mediated activation of glucose transport in isolated mouse skeletal muscle (half-maximal insulin concentration ≈130 microunits/ml, saturating ≈1,100 microunits/ml) (35), as well as insulin-mediated activation of whole body and forearm (i.e., muscle) glucose uptake during euglycemic (5 mM) hyperinsulinemia in man (36). Second, Ca2+ channel blockers (24), wortmannin (30, 31), and removal of extracellular Ca2+ (10), all of which inhibit insulin-mediated glucose transport in muscle, inhibit the insulin-mediated increase in [Ca2+]mem. Last, dantrolene, which inhibits insulin-mediated glucose transport in isolated skeletal muscle (8), blocks the ability of insulin to increase the FIP18 ratio signal (i.e., [Ca2+]mem) above basal (Fig. 3A). These findings suggest that the increase in [Ca2+]mem above basal is an important step in the insulin-mediated activation of glucose transport in skeletal muscle.
Results with low extracellular Ca2+ solutions and blockers of the L-type Ca2+ channels suggest that the increase in [Ca2+]mem is a consequence of Ca2+ influx, presumably through L-type Ca2+ channels in the sarcolemma. Because the L-type Ca2+ channels primarily reside in the transverse tubules (23) and FIP18 probably reflects the near-membrane Ca2+ concentration also in the surface membrane, it is possible that we are underestimating the true local increase in [Ca2+]mem. The precise mechanism by which insulin causes an influx of Ca2+ is not clear. Clearly, it is not by voltage activation of Ca2+ channels because insulin hyperpolarizes rather than depolarizes muscle fibers. One possibility is that Ca2+ channels are activated by one of the many protein kinases that exist in their vicinity (37).
Because insulin mediates its effects by first binding to its receptor, it might be argued that extracellular Ca2+ is needed for insulin binding. Therefore, the reduced insulin response in low extracellular Ca2+ may be explained by insufficient insulin binding rather than by a decrease in Ca2+ entry. Although removal of extracellular Ca2+ was shown to decrease insulin binding in isolated rat muscle by ≈30% (38), it is unlikely that such a decrease in insulin binding substantially compromised insulin signaling. This is supported by the finding that essential depletion of extracellular Ca2+ did not markedly alter the extent of glycogen synthase activation by insulin in muscle cell cultures (39). These observations, together with the present findings that blockers of the L-type Ca2+ channels attenuate the insulin response, favor an influx of Ca2+ rather than impaired insulin binding to its receptor as being the major mechanism whereby Ca2+ is involved in insulin signaling.
The insulin-mediated increase in [Ca2+]mem is markedly reduced by exposing the fibers to wortmannin, which inhibits phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. This might mean that the insulin effect on [Ca2+]mem is mediated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, which is an early intermediate in insulin-mediated but not contraction-mediated glucose transport in skeletal muscle (30, 31). However, in addition to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, wortmannin also inhibits other enzymes (40), which may be involved in the insulin-mediated increase of [Ca2+]mem.
There is now considerable evidence that intracellular Ca2+ gradients exist in cells under certain conditions (18, 41–43), and the current findings are consistent with such data. Although it is currently not clear whether the insulin-induced increase in [Ca2+]mem plays a role in the activation of glucose transport, it is possible that Ca2+ is involved in the docking and insertion of glucose transport proteins (Glut4) receptors into the cell membrane, as in the Ca2+-dependent docking of synaptic vesicles in nerve terminals (44).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Medical Research Council (Project 10842), the Swedish National Center for Sports Research, Magnus Bergvalls Foundation, and Novo Nordisk Fonden and funds at the Karolinska Institutet.
ABBREVIATIONS
- [Ca2+]i
myoplasmic free Ca2+ concentration
- [Ca2+]mem
near-membrane free Ca2+ concentration
- SR
sarcoplasmic reticulum
Footnotes
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the Proceedings Office.
References
- 1.Borkman M, Storlein L H, Pan D A, Jenkins A B, Chisholm D J, Campbell L V. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:238–244. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301283280404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.DeFronzo R A, Gunnarsson R, Björkman O, Olsson M, Wahren J. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:149–155. doi: 10.1172/JCI111938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Saltiel A R. Am J Physiol. 1996;270:E375–E385. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1996.270.3.E375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Villar-Palasi C, Guinovart J J. FASEB J. 1997;11:544–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Draznin B, Reusch J E-B. In: Diabetes Mellitus. Leroith D, Taylor S I, Olefsky J M, editors. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. pp. 227–234. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Romero G, Larner J. Adv Pharmacol. 1993;24:21–50. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(08)60932-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Klip A, Ramlal T. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:9141–9146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Youn J H, Gulve E A, Henriksen E J, Holloszy J O. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:R888–R894. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1994.267.4.R888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pershadsingh H A, Shade D L, Delfert D M, McDonald J M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:1025–1029. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.4.1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schudt C, Gaertner U, Pette D. Eur J Biochem. 1976;68:103–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976.tb10768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Draznin B, Kao M, Sussman K E. Diabetes. 1987;36:174–178. doi: 10.2337/diab.36.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cheung J Y, Constantine J M, Bonventre J V. Am J Physiol. 1987;252:C163–C172. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1987.252.2.C163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kelly K L, Deeney J T, Corkey B E. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:12754–12757. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mueckler M, Holman G. Nature (London) 1995;377:100–101. doi: 10.1038/377100a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lännergren J, Westerblad H. J Physiol (London) 1987;390:285–293. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bers D M, Patton C W, Nuccitelli R. Methods Cell Biol. 1994;40:3–29. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61108-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Westerblad H, Allen D G. J Physiol (London) 1994;474:291–301. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Etter E F, Minta A, Poeni M, Fay F S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:5368–5373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.11.5368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Grynkievicz G, Poenie M, Tsien R Y. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:3440–3450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Andrade F H, Reid M B, Allen D G, Westerblad H. J Physiol (London) 1998;509:565–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.565bn.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Davies E V, Hallett M B. Cell Calcium. 1996;19:355–362. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4160(96)90076-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Allen D G, Westerblad H. J Physiol (London) 1995;487:331–342. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fleischer S, Makato I. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1989;18:333–364. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.18.060189.002001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cartee G D, Briggs-Tung C, Holloszy J O. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:R70–R75. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1992.263.1.R70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cerbai E, Gotti A, Mugelli A. Br J Pharmacol. 1997;120:667–675. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0700951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Young J C, Balon T W. Life Sci. 1997;61:335–342. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(97)00390-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Clausen T, Flatman J. Am J Physiol. 1987;252:E492–E499. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1987.252.4.E492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Miki T, Nagashima K, Tashiro F, Kotake K, Yoshitomi H, Tamamoto A, Gonoi T, Iwanaga T, Miyazaki J-I, Seino S. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:10402–10406. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Miura Y, Henquin J C, Gilon P. J Physiol (London) 1997;503:387–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.387bh.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee A D, Hansen P A, Holloszy J O. FEBS Lett. 1995;361:51–54. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00147-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yeh J-I, Gulve E A, Rameh L, Birnbaum M J. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:2107–2111. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.5.2107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Katz A, Sahlin K, Broberg S. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:E411–E415. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1991.260.3.E411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Challiss R A J, Crabtree B, Newsholme E A. Eur J Biochem. 1987;163:205–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb10756.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Draznin B, Sussman K, Kao M, Lewis D, Sherman N. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:14385–14388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Le Marchand-Brustel Y, Freychet P. J Clin Invest. 1979;64:1505–1515. doi: 10.1172/JCI109609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yki-Jarvinen H, Mott D, Young A A, Stone K, Bogardus C. J Clin Invest. 1987;80:95–100. doi: 10.1172/JCI113069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gray P C, Tibbs V C, Catterall W A, Murphy B J. J Biol Chem. 1997;242:6297–6302. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.10.6297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gould M K, Chaudry I H. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970;215:249–257. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(70)90022-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gaertner U, Schudt C, Pette D. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1977;8:35–46. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(77)90016-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cross M J, Stewart A, Hodgkin M N, Kerr D J, Wakelam M J O. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:25352–25355. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Golovina V A, Blaustein M P. Science. 1997;275:1643–1648. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5306.1643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Petersen O H, Petersen C C H, Kasai H. Annu Rev Physiol. 1994;56:297–319. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.56.030194.001501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Marrion N V, Tavalin S J. Nature (London) 1998;395:900–905. doi: 10.1038/27674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jahn R, Sudhof T C. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1994;17:219–246. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.001251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]