Skip to main content
PMC home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1994 May;105(1):309–320. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.1.309

Competitive Inhibition of High-Affinity Oryzalin Binding to Plant Tubulin by the Phosphoric Amide Herbicide Amiprophos-Methyl.

J V Murthy 1, H H Kim 1, V R Hanesworth 1, J D Hugdahl 1, L C Morejohn 1
PMCID: PMC159359  PMID: 12232204

Abstract

Amiprophos-methyl (APM), a phosphoric amide herbicide, was previously reported to inhibit the in vitro polymerization of isolated plant tubulin (L.C. Morejohn, D.E. Fosket [1984] Science 224: 874-876), yet little other biochemical information exists concerning this compound. To characterize further the mechanism of action of APM, its interactions with tubulin and microtubules purified from cultured cells of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv Bright Yellow-2) were investigated. Low micromolar concentrations of APM depolymerized preformed, taxol-stabilized tobacco microtubules. Remarkably, at the lowest APM concentration examined, many short microtubules were redistributed into fewer but 2.7-fold longer microtubules without a substantial decrease in total polymer mass, a result consistent with an end-to-end annealing of microtubules with enhanced kinetic properties. Quasi-equilibrium binding measurements showed that tobacco tubulin binds [14C]oryzalin with high affinity to produce a tubulin-oryzalin complex having a dissociation constant (Kd) = 117 nM (pH 6.9; 23[deg]C). Also, an estimated maximum molar binding stoichiometry of 0.32 indicates pharamacological heterogeneity of tobacco dimers and may be related to structural heterogeneity of tobacco tubulin subunits. APM inhibits competitively the binding of [14C]oryzalin to tubulin with an inhibition constant (Ki) = 5 [mu]M, indicating the formation of a moderate affinity tubulin-APM complex that may interact with the ends of microtubules. APM concentrations inhibiting tobacco cell growth were within the threshold range of APM concentrations that depolymerized cellular microtubules, indicating that growth inhibition is caused by microtubules depolymerization. APM had no apparent effect on microtubules in mouse 3T3 fibroblasts. Because cellular microtubules were depolymerized at APM and oryzalin concentrations below their respective Ki and Kd values, both herbicides are proposed to depolymerize microtubules by a substoichiometric endwise mechanism.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bajer A. S., Molè-Bajer J. Drugs with colchicine-like effects that specifically disassemble plant but not animal microtubules. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;466:767–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb38458.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blose S. H., Meltzer D. I., Feramisco J. R. 10-nm filaments are induced to collapse in living cells microinjected with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against tubulin. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):847–858. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bokros C. L., Hugdahl J. D., Hanesworth V. R., Murthy J. V., Morejohn L. C. Characterization of the reversible taxol-induced polymerization of plant tubulin into microtubules. Biochemistry. 1993 Apr 6;32(13):3437–3447. doi: 10.1021/bi00064a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caplow M., Zeeberg B. Dynamic properties of microtubules at steady state in the presence of taxol. Eur J Biochem. 1982 Oct;127(2):319–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06873.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gelfand V. I., Bershadsky A. D. Microtubule dynamics: mechanism, regulation, and function. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1991;7:93–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.07.110191.000521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hugdahl J. D., Morejohn L. C. Rapid and Reversible High-Affinity Binding of the Dinitroaniline Herbicide Oryzalin to Tubulin from Zea mays L. Plant Physiol. 1993 Jul;102(3):725–740. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.3.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. James S. W., Silflow C. D., Stroom P., Lefebvre P. A. A mutation in the alpha 1-tubulin gene of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii confers resistance to anti-microtubule herbicides. J Cell Sci. 1993 Sep;106(Pt 1):209–218. doi: 10.1242/jcs.106.1.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Klotz I. M. Numbers of receptor sites from Scatchard graphs: facts and fantasies. Science. 1982 Sep 24;217(4566):1247–1249. doi: 10.1126/science.6287580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar N. Taxol-induced polymerization of purified tubulin. Mechanism of action. J Biol Chem. 1981 Oct 25;256(20):10435–10441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morejohn L. C., Fosket D. E. Higher plant tubulin identified by self-assembly into microtubules in vitro. Nature. 1982 Jun 3;297(5865):426–428. doi: 10.1038/297426a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morejohn L. C., Fosket D. E. Inhibition of Plant Microtubule Polymerization in vitro by the Phosphoric Amide Herbicide Amiprophos-Methyl. Science. 1984 May 25;224(4651):874–876. doi: 10.1126/science.224.4651.874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Osborn M., Weber K. Immunofluorescence and immunocytochemical procedures with affinity purified antibodies: tubulin-containing structures. Methods Cell Biol. 1982;24:97–132. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60650-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parness J., Horwitz S. B. Taxol binds to polymerized tubulin in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):479–487. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Quader H., Filner P. The action of antimitotic herbicides on flagellar regeneration in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a comparison with the action of colchicine. Eur J Cell Biol. 1980 Aug;21(3):301–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rothwell S. W., Grasser W. A., Murphy D. B. End-to-end annealing of microtubules in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1986 Feb;102(2):619–627. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.2.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schibler M. J., Huang B. The colR4 and colR15 beta-tubulin mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii confer altered sensitivities to microtubule inhibitors and herbicides by enhancing microtubule stability. J Cell Biol. 1991 May;113(3):605–614. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.3.605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Simmonds D. H., Seagull R. W., Setterfield G. Evaluation of techniques for immunofluorescent staining of microtubules in cultured plant cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 1985 Apr;33(4):345–352. doi: 10.1177/33.4.2579999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Studier F. W. Analysis of bacteriophage T7 early RNAs and proteins on slab gels. J Mol Biol. 1973 Sep 15;79(2):237–248. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90003-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilson L., Miller H. P., Farrell K. W., Snyder K. B., Thompson W. C., Purich D. L. Taxol stabilization of microtubules in vitro: dynamics of tubulin addition and loss at opposite microtubule ends. Biochemistry. 1985 Sep 10;24(19):5254–5262. doi: 10.1021/bi00340a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES