Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1994 Jun;105(2):715–724. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.2.715

Multiple Forms of Phospholipase D following Germination and during Leaf Development of Castor Bean.

J H Dyer 1, S B Ryu 1, X Wang 1
PMCID: PMC159413  PMID: 12232238

Abstract

Multiple molecular forms of phospholipase D (PLD; EC 3.1.4.4) were identified and partially characterized in endosperm of germinated seeds and leaves of castor bean (Ricinus communis L. var Hale). The different PLD forms were resolved by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, isoelectric focusing, and size-exclusion chromatography. PLD was detected with both a PLD activity assay and immunoblots with PLD-specific antibodies. There were three major forms of PLD, designated types 1, 2, and 3, based on their mobility during nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Molecular masses of the PLD variants were estimated at 330, 230, and 270 kD for the types 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Isoelectric points of the native type 1, 2, and 3 PLDs were approximately 6.2, 4.9, and 4.8. Under the in vitro assay conditions used, the three forms of PLD exhibited the same substrate specificity, hydrolyzing phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) but not phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylinositol (PI). The three forms of PLD differed in their substrate preferences, and the order of activities was: PLD 1, PE > PG = PC; PLD 2, PE > PG > PC; PLD 3, PE = PG = PC. The Km values of PLDs 1, 2, and 3 for PC were 1.92, 2.62, and 5.18 mM, respectively. These PLDs were expressed differentially following seed germination and during leaf development. Type 1 was found in the early stages of seedling growth and in young leaves, type 2 was present in all the tissues and growth stages examined, and type 3 was expressed in senescent tissues. The PLDs shifted from largely cytosolic to predominantly membrane-associated forms during leaf development. The present studies demonstrate the structural heterogeneity of plant PLD and growth stage-specific expression of different molecular forms. The possible role for the occurrence of multiple molecular forms of PLD in cellular metabolism is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Billah M. M. Phospholipase D and cell signaling. Curr Opin Immunol. 1993 Feb;5(1):114–123. doi: 10.1016/0952-7915(93)90090-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dennis E. A., Rhee S. G., Billah M. M., Hannun Y. A. Role of phospholipase in generating lipid second messengers in signal transduction. FASEB J. 1991 Apr;5(7):2068–2077. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.5.7.1901288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heller M. Phospholipase D. Adv Lipid Res. 1978;16:267–326. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-024916-9.50011-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Herman E. M., Chrispeels M. J. Characteristics and subcellular localization of phospholipase d and phosphatidic Acid phosphatase in mung bean cotyledons. Plant Physiol. 1980 Nov;66(5):1001–1007. doi: 10.1104/pp.66.5.1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang C., Wykle R. L., Daniel L. W., Cabot M. C. Identification of phosphatidylcholine-selective and phosphatidylinositol-selective phospholipases D in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J Biol Chem. 1992 Aug 25;267(24):16859–16865. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lands W. E., Hart P. Metabolism of plasmalogen. 3. Relative reactivities of acyl and alkenyl derivatives of glycerol-3-phosphorylcholine. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Jun 1;98(3):532–538. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(65)90149-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Robertson E. F., Dannelly H. K., Malloy P. J., Reeves H. C. Rapid isoelectric focusing in a vertical polyacrylamide minigel system. Anal Biochem. 1987 Dec;167(2):290–294. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90166-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Roughan P. G., Slack C. R. Is phospholipase D really an enzyme? A comparison of in situ and in vitro activities. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Apr 22;431(1):86–95. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(76)90262-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rouser G., Fkeischer S., Yamamoto A. Two dimensional then layer chromatographic separation of polar lipids and determination of phospholipids by phosphorus analysis of spots. Lipids. 1970 May;5(5):494–496. doi: 10.1007/BF02531316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Voisine R., Vezina L. P., Willemot C. Modification of Phospholipid Catabolism in Microsomal Membranes of [gamma]-Irradiated Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.). Plant Physiol. 1993 May;102(1):213–218. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.1.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang P., Anthes J. C., Siegel M. I., Egan R. W., Billah M. M. Existence of cytosolic phospholipase D. Identification and comparison with membrane-bound enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1991 Aug 15;266(23):14877–14880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang X., Dyer J. H., Zheng L. Purification and immunological analysis of phospholipase D from castor bean endosperm. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993 Nov 1;306(2):486–494. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1993.1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yotsushima K., Mitsui T., Takaoka T., Hayakawa T., Igaue I. Purification and Characterization of Membrane-Bound Inositol Phospholipid-Specific Phospholipase C from Suspension-Cultured Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cells (Identification of a Regulatory Factor). Plant Physiol. 1993 May;102(1):165–172. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.1.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES