Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2006 Sep;44(9):3415–3417. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00508-06

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Rapid Identification of Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Alcaligenes faecalis Recovered from Cystic Fibrosis Patients

Nele Wellinghausen 1,*, Beate Wirths 1, Sven Poppert 1
PMCID: PMC1594702  PMID: 16954289

Abstract

Achromobacter xylosoxidans is frequently isolated from the respiratory secretions of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, but identification with biochemical tests is unreliable. We describe fluorescence in situ hybridization assays for the rapid identification of Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Alcaligenes faecalis. Both assays showed high sensitivities and high specificities with a collection of 155 nonfermenters from CF patients.


Achromobacter xylosoxidans is a gram-negative, oxidase-positive, non-glucose-fermenting rod that is widely distributed in the environment. The species is found in two subspecies, called A. xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans and A. xylosoxidans subsp. denitrificans. Due to the close relation to Alcaligenes spp., the species has intermittently been named Alcaligenes (28); but in 1998, use of the initial name, Achromobacter xylosoxidans, was again proposed (31).

Human infections caused by A. xylosoxidans mainly comprise nosocomial infections, like device-associated infections, bacteremia, meningitis, and peritonitis (1, 7, 9, 19, 21, 25, 26). In cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, A. xylosoxidans causes temporary and persistent infections of the respiratory tract (5, 11, 12, 18, 22, 24, 27). The rate of persistent infection among CF patients varies from 2.3% to 8.7% (5, 24), and the proportion of patients who are temporarily infected reaches up to 10% (14, 18, 24). Although our knowledge about the significance of this species in the deterioration of pulmonary function in CF patients is limited (24), accurate identification of A. xylosoxidans is desirable for the following reasons. First, it is the necessary prerequisite for assessment of the epidemiology and clinical significance of the species; second, A. xylosoxidans is frequently confused with other nonfermenters, like members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex, Alcaligenes faecalis, and Pseudomonas spp., which has a considerable impact on patient management (8, 17, 23, 29, 30); third, multidrug resistance is found in one-third of A. xylosoxidans isolates in CF patients (12, 14); and fourth, transmission of A. xylosoxidans strains between close contacts seem to occur more frequently than was previously assumed (13, 27).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been proven to be a rapid, easy-to-perform, and comparably cheap method for the identification of bacterial pathogens (10, 20, 30). Therefore, we evaluated this technique for use for the identification of A. xylosoxidans and the closely related species Alcaligenes faecalis from CF patients. Both new FISH probes were evaluated with a panel of reference strains as well as 155 clinical isolates of gram-negative, oxidase-positive rods from CF patients.

Probes Ach-221 (5′-CGC TCY AAT AGT GCA AGG TC) and Alc-476 (5′-CTG CAG ATA CCG TCA GCA GT), which bind to 16S rRNA at positions 221 to 240 and 476 to 495, respectively, were designed by using the ARB program package (available at http://www.arb-home.de), synthesized, and 5′ labeled with the fluorescent dye Cy3 by Thermo Hybaid, Ulm, Germany. The probes were controlled by use of the ARB software as well as by a search of the sequences in the GenBank database with the BLAST program (2). Ten microliters of a bacterial suspension in 0.9% saline, prepared from an overnight culture on sheep blood agar or MacConkey agar, was applied to a glass slide, air dried, and fixed for 5 min in methanol. FISH was performed at 46°C, as described elsewhere (4, 16). Bacterial probe EUB-338 (5′-GCT GCC TCC CGT AGG AGT), which targets nearly all bacterial species (3), was used as a positive control on each slide. The optimal hybridization stringency was determined to be formamide concentrations of 50% for probe Ach-221 and 40% for probe Alc-476 by increasing the formamide concentrations in the hybridization buffer in increments of 10% and by lowering the salt concentration accordingly in the wash buffer (16).

The sensitivities and specificities of the FISH probes were evaluated in a blinded manner with a panel of reference strains, including closely related species as well as common CF pathogens (Table 1). Probe Ach-221 correctly identified both subspecies of A. xylosoxidans. It showed a faint cross-reaction with Achromobacter ruhlandii but not with other species (Table 1). Probe Alc-476 specifically identified both subspecies of Alcaligenes faecalis. Cross-reactions with other species were not detected (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Evaluation of the probes on reference strains

Straina Sourceb Result with probec:
Ach-221 Alc-476
Achromobacter piechaudii ATCC 43552
Achromobacter ruhlandii ATCC 15749 (+)
Achromobacter xylosoxidans subsp. denitrificans ATCC 15173 +
Achromobacter xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans ATCC 27061 +
Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. faecalis ATCC 8750 +
Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. faecalis ATCC 35655 +
Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. parafaecalis DSM 13975 +
Bordetella avium ATCC 35086
Bordetella bronchiseptica ci (1)
Bordetella hinzii ATCC 51783
Bordetella holmesii ATCC 51541
Bordetella parapertussis DSM 4922
Bordetella pertussis ATCC 9797
Burkholderia cepacia genomovar I ATCC 25416
Burkholderia cenocepacia DSM 16553T
Burkholderia cenocepacia ci (1)
Burkholderia dolosa DSM 16088T
Burkholderia gladioli ATCC 10248
Burkholderia multivorans DSM 13243
Flavimonas oryzihabitans ci (1)
Flavobacterium odoratimimus QC 02/05
Pandoraea apista DSM 16535T
Pandoraea norimbergensis DSM 11628T
Pandoraea pnomenusa DSM 16536T
Pandoraea pulmonicola DSM 16583T
Pandoraea species ci (2)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853
Pseudomonas luteola QC 02/05
Pseudomonas putida ci (1)
Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC 17588
Ralstonia gilardii ATCC 700815
Ralstonia mannitolilytica DSM 17512T
Ralstonia pickettii ATCC 27511
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ATCC 13637
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ci (2)
Tetrathiobacter kashmirensis ci (1)
a

Species identification was confirmed by complete 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

b

QC, external quality control strain of the Institute for Standardization and Documentation in the Medical Laboratory. ci, clinical isolate (number of isolates).

c

+, positive; (+), weakly positive; −, negative.

For clinical evaluation of the probes, all gram-negative, oxidase-positive, non-glucose-fermenting rods except morphologically typical Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains (n = 155) isolated from CF patients from 1 January 2003 to 5 April 2005 in our laboratory were used. This collection included 88 isolates that were already part of an earlier study (30). Species identification of clinical isolates was done by P. aeruginosa-specific FISH and by sequencing of the complete 16S rRNA gene, as described earlier (30). A. xylosoxidans-specific probe Ach-221 correctly identified all isolates of A. xylosoxidans (n = 25) and, thus, showed a sensitivity of 100%. It cross-reacted only with one isolate of a Chryseobacterium sp., resulting in a specificity of 99.2%. The single strain of Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. faecalis that was isolated during the study period was correctly identified with the Alcaligenes faecalis-specific probe (Table 2). The probe did not cross-react with any species, resulting in a specificity of 100%.

TABLE 2.

Evaluation of the probes on oxidase-positive nonfermenters from CF patients

Species No. of isolates No. of isolates with positive result with probe:
Ach-221 Alc-476
Achromobacter xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans 25 25 0
Agrobacterium radiobacter 2 0 0
Alcaligenes faecalis 1 0 1
Burkholderia multivorans 21 0 0
Chryseobacterium species 3 1 0
Inquilinus limosus 1 0 0
Ochrobactrum anthropi 1 0 0
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 93 0 0
Pseudomonas alcaligenes 1 0 0
Pseudomonas brassicacearum 1 0 0
Pseudomonas fluorescens 1 0 0
Pseudomonas putida 1 0 0
Pseudomonas stutzeri 2 0 0
Pseudomonas synxantha 1 0 0
Sphingomonas paucimobilis 1 0 0

A. xylosoxidans became recognized as an “emerging” CF pathogen in the 1980s and has been studied with growing interest during the last decade. Ferroni et al. (8) reported that A. xylosoxidans was the second most frequent gram-negative nonfermenter, after Pseudomonas aeruginosa, recovered from among 1,093 isolates from 148 patients. Nevertheless, identification of A. xylosoxidans is still a challenge for the clinical microbiologist; and by using biochemical and commercial tests, it is frequently confused with other nonfermenters, especially members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (8, 17, 23, 29, 30). Modern molecular methods, like sequencing of ribosomal genes, allow accurate identification of gram-negative rods, including A. xylosoxidans, from CF patients (6, 8, 17). Despite its exactness, DNA sequencing is, however, not preferable for routine identification of common CF pathogens like A. xylosoxidans due to its comparatively high costs and the requirement for specific technical equipment. In addition, public DNA databases that do not involve quality control measures also contain faulty or incorrectly assigned sequences, leading to the misidentification of isolates. By alignment of public sequences with sequences of American Type Culture Collection strains, we found, for example, that GenBank entry AJ509012, assigned as Alcaligenes faecalis, is in fact a 16S rRNA gene sequence of A. xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans. Recently, Liu et al. (15) described a ribosomal DNA-directed PCR assay for the identification of both subspecies of A. xylosoxidans from CF patients. The PCR primer cross bound, however, to A. ruhlandii and Achromobacter piechaudii (15).

Our newly designed A. xylosoxidans-specific probe Ach-221 showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for the identification of A. xylosoxidans. Due to the close relationship, weak cross binding was seen with A. ruhlandii, but the probe did not cross bind to the pathogenic species A. piechaudii. The cross-reaction to A. ruhlandii is clinically negligible since this species has not yet been found in human specimens. The observed false-positive result of probe Ach-221 with a single isolate of a Chryseobacterium sp. is probably caused by unspecific binding of the probe to an unknown target since we did not find homologous sequences in the probe and the 16S rRNA gene of this Chryseobacterium strain. The Alcaligenes faecalis-specific probe also showed excellent sensitivity and specificity and is, therefore, a valuable adjunct to the A. xylosoxidans-specific probe. Nevertheless, due to the small number of Alcaligenes isolates included in this study and the continued emergence of new bacterial species, especially gram-negative rods, in CF patients, further evaluation and critical assessment of the probes are necessary.

In conclusion, the FISH probes described here are excellent tools for the rapid and specific identification of A. xylosoxidans and Alcaligenes faecalis isolates from the respiratory secretions of CF patients. The FISH assay can be performed within 2.5 h and, thus, allows the correct identification of these species on the same day that positive cultures from a clinical specimen are obtained. Due to its low cost and simplicity, the FISH assay is also very useful for the large screening studies that are necessary for final evaluation of the clinical significance of A. xylosoxidans in CF patients.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Aisenberg, G., K. V. Rolston, and A. Safdar. 2004. Bacteremia caused by Achromobacter and Alcaligenes species in 46 patients with cancer (1989-2003). Cancer 101:2134-2140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amann, R. I., B. J. Binder, R. J. Olson, S. W. Chisholm, R. Devereux, and D. A. Stahl. 1990. Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:1919-1925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Amann, R. I., W. Ludwig, and K. H. Schleifer. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59:143-169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burns, J. L., J. Emerson, J. R. Stapp, D. L. Yim, J. Krzewinski, L. Louden, B. W. Ramsey, and C. R. Clausen. 1998. Microbiology of sputum from patients at cystic fibrosis centers in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:158-163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coenye, T., J. Goris, T. Spilker, P. Vandamme, and J. J. LiPuma. 2002. Characterization of unusual bacteria isolated from respiratory secretions of cystic fibrosis patients and description of Inquilinus limosus gen. nov., sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2062-2069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.El Shahawy, M. A., D. Kim, and M. F. Gadallah. 1998. Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis caused by Alcaligenes xylosoxidans. Am. J. Nephrol. 18:452-455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ferroni, A., I. Sermet-Gaudelus, E. Abachin, G. Quesne, G. Lenoir, P. Berche, and J. L. Gaillard. 2002. Use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for identification of nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli recovered from patients attending a single cystic fibrosis center. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3793-3797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gomez-Cerezo, J., I. Suarez, J. J. Rios, P. Pena, M. J. Garcia de Miguel, M. de Jose, O. Monteagudo, P. Linares, A. Barbado-Cano, and J. J. Vazquez. 2003. Achromobacter xylosoxidans bacteremia: a 10-year analysis of 54 cases. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22:360-363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hogardt, M., K. Trebesius, A. M. Geiger, M. Hornef, J. Rosenecker, and J. Heesemann. 2000. Specific and rapid detection by fluorescent in situ hybridization of bacteria in clinical samples obtained from cystic fibrosis patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:818-825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kanellopoulou, M., S. Pournaras, H. Iglezos, N. Skarmoutsou, E. Papafrangas, and A. N. Maniatis. 2004. Persistent colonization of nine cystic fibrosis patients with an Achromobacter (Alcaligenes) xylosoxidans clone. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 23:336-339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Klinger, J. D., and M. J. Thomassen. 1985. Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-negative nonfermentative bacilli in cystic fibrosis patients. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 3:149-158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krzewinski, J. W., C. D. Nguyen, J. M. Foster, and J. L. Burns. 2001. Use of random amplified polymorphic DNA PCR to examine epidemiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Achromobacter (Alcaligenes) xylosoxidans from patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3597-3602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lambiase, A., V. Raia, M. Del Pezzo, A. Sepe, V. Carnovale, and F. Rossano. 2006. Microbiology of airway disease in a cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis. BMC Infect. Dis. 6:4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu, L., T. Coenye, J. L. Burns, P. W. Whitby, T. L. Stull, and J. J. LiPuma. 2002. Ribosomal DNA-directed PCR for identification of Achromobacter (Alcaligenes) xylosoxidans recovered from sputum samples from cystic fibrosis patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1210-1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Manz, W. R. Amann, W. Ludwig, M. Wagner, and K. H. Schleifer. 1992. Phylogenetic oligodeoxynucleotide probes for the major subclasses of proteobacteria: problems and solutions. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1:593-600. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McMenamin, J. D., T. M. Zaccone, T. Coenye, P. Vandamme, and J. J. LiPuma. 2000. Misidentification of Burkholderia cepacia in US cystic fibrosis treatment centers: an analysis of 1,051 recent sputum isolates. Chest 117:1661-1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moissenet, D., A. Baculard, M. Valcin, V. Marchand, G. Tournier, A. Garbarg-Chenon, and H. Vu-Thien. 1997. Colonization by Alcaligenes xylosoxidans in children with cystic fibrosis: a retrospective clinical study conducted by means of molecular epidemiological investigation. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:274-275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Namnyak, S. S., B. Holmes, and S. E. Fathalla. 1985. Neonatal meningitis caused by Achromobacter xylosoxidans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22:470-471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Poppert, S., A. Essig, B. Stoehr, A. Steingruber, B. Wirths, S. Juretschko, U. Reischl, and N. Wellinghausen. 2005. Rapid diagnosis of bacterial meningitis by real-time PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:3390-3397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ramos, J. M., R. Fernandez-Roblas, P. Garcia-Ruiz, and F. Soriano. 1995. Meningitis caused by Alcaligenes (Achromobacter) xylosoxidans associated with epidural catheter. Infection 23:395-396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saiman, L., Y. Chen, S. Tabibi, P. San Gabriel, J. Zhou, Z. Liu, L. Lai, and S. Whittier. 2001. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of Alcaligenes xylosoxidans isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3942-3945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shelly, D. B., T. Spilker, E. J. Gracely, T. Coenye, P. Vandamme, and J. J. LiPuma. 2000. Utility of commercial systems for identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex from cystic fibrosis sputum culture. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3112-3115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tan, K., S. P. Conway, K. G. Brownlee, C. Etherington, and D. G. Peckham. 2002. Alcaligenes infection in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 34:101-104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tang, S., C. C. Cheng, K. C. Tse, F. K. Li, B. Y. Choy, T. M. Chan, and K. N. Lai. 2001. CAPD-associated peritonitis caused by Alcaligenes xylosoxidans sp. xylosoxidans. Am. J. Nephrol. 21:502-506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tsay, R. W., L. C. Lin, C. S. Chiou, J. C. Liao, C. H. Chen, C. E. Liu, and T. G. Young. 2005. Alcaligenes xylosoxidans bacteremia: clinical features and microbiological characteristics of isolates. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 38:194-199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Van Daele, S., R. Verhelst, G. Claeys, G. Verschraegen, H. Franckx, L. Van Simaey, C. de Ganck, F. De Baets, and M. Vaneechoutte. 2005. Shared genotypes of Achromobacter xylosoxidans strains isolated from patients at a cystic fibrosis rehabilitation center. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2998-3002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vandamme, P., M. Heyndrickx, M. Vancanneyt, B. Hoste, P. De Vos, E. Falsen, K. Kersters, and K. H. Hinz. 1996. Bordetella trematum sp. nov., isolated from wounds and ear infections in humans, and reassessment of Alcaligenes denitrificans Ruger and Tan 1983. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46:849-858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.van Pelt, C., C. M. Verduin, W. H. Goessens, M. C. Vos, B. Tummler, C. Segonds, F. Reubsaet, H. Verbrugh, and A. van Belkum. 1999. Identification of Burkholderia spp. in the clinical microbiology laboratory: comparison of conventional and molecular methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2158-2164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wellinghausen, N., J. Kothe, B. Wirths, A. Sigge, and S. Poppert. 2005. Superiority of molecular techniques for identification of gram-negative, oxidase-positive rods, including morphologically nontypical Pseudomonas aeruginosa, from patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4070-4075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yabuuchi, E., Y. Kawamura, Y. Kosako, and T. Ezaki. 1998. Emendation of genus Achromobacter and Achromobacter xylosoxidans (Yabuuchi and Yano) and proposal of Achromobacter ruhlandii (Packer and Vishniac) comb. nov., Achromobacter piechaudii (Kiredjian et al.) comb. nov., and Achromobacter xylosoxidans subsp. denitrificans (Ruger and Tan) comb. nov. Microbiol. Immunol. 42:429-438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES