Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2006 Sep;74(9):5419–5421. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00739-06

N-Acetyllactosamine Conjugated to Gold Nanoparticles Inhibits Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Colonization of the Epithelium in Human Intestinal Biopsy Specimens

Romney M Hyland 1, Paul Beck 2, George L Mulvey 1, Pavel I Kitov 3, Glen D Armstrong 1,*
PMCID: PMC1594845  PMID: 16926439

Abstract

We previously reported that the bundle-forming pilus-mediated localized adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HEp-2, T84, and Caco-2 cells is inhibited by N-acetyllactosamine neoglycoconjugates. The results presented here extend this observation to the epithelium of biopsy specimens obtained from the human adult duodenum, terminal ileum, and colon.


Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) is a common cause of diarrhea in neonates in developing nations and in adults who travel to regions of the world where the organism is endemic (17). EPEC strains infect and colonize their hosts through a three-step interactive process that involves initial binding, signal transduction, and intimate adherence (4, 6, 8, 9, 14). In the first stage of this process, EPEC forms microcolonies on the host cell surface, a phenotype called localized adherence (7, 10) which is dependent on bundle-forming pili (BFP) expressed by the EPEC (7, 10). These BFP are also thought to be required for efficient colonization of the host during infection (3, 5).

We previously reported that N-acetyllactosamine (LacNAc) neoglycoconjugates inhibit EPEC localized adherence in laryngeal HEp-2 cells (21), as well as in the intestinal Caco-2 and T84 cell lines (13, 21). More recently, we demonstrated that BFP likely act as a LacNAc-specific adhesin in this processes (13). Here, we extended these tissue culture cell observations to human intestinal biopsy specimens to further explore the feasibility of using LacNAc-based glycoconjugate preparations as a potential treatment strategy in EPEC gastrointestinal infections.

After informed consent was obtained, tissue samples were obtained during colonoscopy procedures performed for colon cancer screening and/or during upper endoscopy procedures using standard large biopsy forceps. Biopsies from adjacent regions were used for pathological assessment. Only biopsy specimens with normal morphology as determined by histological review were used in this study. The method and process used for obtaining the specimens were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Panel of the University of Calgary. The ages and sexes of the subjects from whom biopsies were obtained are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the seven male and nine female subjects was 57 years (range, 51 years). Once removed, the biopsy samples were placed into ice-chilled phosphate-buffered physiological saline (pH 7.2) and used in the experiments within 1 h.

TABLE 1.

Patient characteristics and number of adherent EPEC E2348/69 cells for intestinal biopsies in the presence of 0.8 mg/ml Pk-Aua

Patient Age (yr) Sex Biopsy region No. of adherent E2348/69 cells
00 62 M TC 2.3 × 106
14 46 M TC 1.4 × 107
17 74 M TC 1.2 × 106
20 32 F TC 2.3 × 104
22 52 M TI 7.6 × 106
TC 2.7 × 106
31 80 F TC 7.3 × 106
34 47 F Duodenum 1.2 × 103
TI 1.5 × 105
TC 1.2 × 104
35 67 M TC 480
42 83 M TC 2.7 × 106
53 44 F TC 4.5 × 106
59 60 M Duodenum 400
TC 2.2 × 103
66 80 F TC 4.4 × 103
68 38 M Duodenum 3.4 × 105
TI 1.4 × 106
TC 2.0 × 105
70 73 F Duodenum 150
TC 970
71 48 F Duodenum 260
TI 1.2 × 103
84 65 F TC 3.8 × 105
94 67 F TC 1.2 × 107
a

M, male; F, female; TC, transverse colon; TI, terminal ileum.

Polystyrene biopsy holders (Fig. 1) were custom designed so that EPEC binding could be physically restricted to the epithelial surface of the biopsy. The biopsy specimens were oriented and mounted with the luminal side up using a dissecting microscope. Thus, the mucosal biopsy involved a two-chamber system, with a bottom submucosal side and an upper luminal side. Both chambers were filled with Dulbecco modified Eagle medium during the experiments.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Front (A) and side (B) views of the apparatus used to mount biopsy specimens so that the epithelial surface could be physically isolated from the nonepithelial cells and tissues.

Prior to each experiment, BFP expression by the wild-type E2348/69 EPEC strain (13, 21) was induced by culturing the bacteria in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium as described previously (20, 21). The cultures were added to 48-well plates containing either 0.8 mg/ml LacNAc-Au or Pk-Au (13) and incubated for 30 min at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. The method used for preparation of the LacNAc and Pk-Au compounds has been described previously (11). The medium was removed from the luminal upper compartment of a biopsy chamber, and 100 μl of the LacNAc-Au-E2348/69 or Pk-Au-E2348/69 mixture was added to the epithelial surface of a biopsy sample. After 30 min of incubation at 37°C in the CO2 incubator, the biopsies were washed five times with ice-chilled phosphate-buffered saline to remove unbound bacteria.

To determine the number of adherent bacteria, whole genomic DNA was extracted from the intestinal biopsies using a QIAamp DNA Micro kit (QIAGEN, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Bacteria were quantified by performing real-time PCR of the intimin (eaeA) gene using the oligonucleotide primers described elsewhere (16). Real-time PCR was performed with a Rotor-Gene 3000 instrument (Corbett Research, Sydney, Australia) using a QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit (QIAGEN, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The thermal cycling conditions used for amplifying the eaeA gene are described elsewhere (16). Five 10-fold dilutions of whole genomic DNA that was isolated from E2348/69 using a standard protocol (1) were used as an internal control for the PCR.

Using this approach, we observed significant variability in the number of EPEC cells attached to the individual biopsy specimens (Table 1). In the transverse colon biopsies alone, we observed a >5-log range in EPEC adherence; the values ranged from 480 adherent bacteria for patient 35 to 1.2 × 107 adherent bacteria for patient 94 (Table 1). For two patients, no EPEC bound to the biopsy samples (data not shown). There was no correlation between subject age or sex and the number of adherent bacteria (P = 0.655 and P = 0.952, respectively, as determined by the Pearson product-moment correlation test).

Regardless of the variability in EPEC binding, LacNAc-Au at a concentration of 0.8 mg/ml inhibited (compared to the negative Pk-Au control) EPEC adherence to the epithelial surface in all biopsies obtained from all subjects (Fig. 2) (13). The inhibitory effect was significant in the duodenal (P = 0.002), the terminal ileum (P = 0.002), and the transverse colon (P < 0.001) biopsy specimens (as determined by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The residual EPEC binding to the intestinal biopsy specimens when LacNAc-Au was present may be attributed to other potential EPEC adhesins, including a phosphatidylethanolamine-specific BFP-associated adhesin (2, 22), flagella (11), EspA (15), and intimin (18, 19).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

E2348/69 adherence to duodenal (A), terminal ileum (B), and transverse colon (C) biopsies. The results are expressed as percentages of adherence in the presence of LacNAc-Au (open bars) relative to the adherence observed in the presence of Pk-Au (solid bars). Experiments were performed in duplicate, and the error bars indicate ranges.

This study allowed us to extend our previous observation that EPEC may exploit host cell LacNAc or LacNAc-related glycan receptor sequences during colonization of HEp-2, Caco-2, and T84 cells in culture to the adult human intestinal epithelium. This suggests that a BFP-associated lectin-like adhesin is likely involved in the initial attachment of EPEC to LacNAc or LacNAc-related receptors on intestinal epithelial cells in adults at least. This suggestion is further supported by studies which showed that mutant EPEC strains that lack the capacity to express BFP were less virulent in human adult volunteer challenge studies (3). In contrast to these results, Hicks and colleagues (12) reported that BFP were not important mediators of EPEC early adherence to pediatric intestinal biopsy specimens when the in vitro organ culture system was used. The discrepancy between our results and those of Hicks and colleagues may be attributed to differences between EPEC attachment to adult tissues and EPEC attachment to pediatric tissues. However, in a more recent paper, Cleary and colleagues (5) reported that BFP are required for efficient colonization of pediatric intestinal biopsy tissue at early times, a conclusion that is consistent with the results reported here.

Since LacNAc-Au reduced EPEC binding to the epithelial surface of all the biopsy specimens examined, such a glycoconjugate preparation may offer a new therapeutic modality for managing patients with EPEC infections and also may have prophylactic value for subjects traveling to regions where the organism is endemic. Our results also support investigation of the therapeutic or prophylactic potential of Au-based glycoconjugates bearing specific glycan sequences implicated in the colonization strategies of other important microbial pathogens.

Acknowledgments

Financial support was provided by the Canadian Bacterial Diseases Network (G.D.A.), the Alberta Ingenuity Centre for Carbohydrate Science (G.D.A. and P.I.K.), and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (G.D.A.). R.M.H. was the recipient of a studentship from NSERC.

G.D.A. is a coinventor on U.S. patent 6,291,435 for the treatment of diarrhea caused by enteropathogenic E. coli.

Editor: A. D. O'Brien

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1999. Short protocols in molecular biology, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  • 2.Barnett Foster, D., D. Philpott, M. Abul-Milh, M. Huesca, P. M. Sherman, and C. A. Lingwood. 1999. Phosphatidylethanolamine recognition promotes enteropathogenic E. coli and enterohemorrhagic E. coli host cell attachment. Microb. Pathog. 27:289-301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bieber, D., S. W. Ramer, C. Y. Wu, W. J. Murray, T. Tobe, R. Fernandez, and G. K. Schoolnik. 1998. Type IV pili, transient bacterial aggregates, and virulence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science 280:2114-2118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Campellone, K. G., and J. M. Leong. 2003. Tails of two Tirs: actin pedestal formation by enteropathogenic E. coli and enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6:82-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cleary, J., L. C. Lai, R. K. Shaw, A. Straatman-Iwanowska, M. S. Donnenberg, G. Frankel, and S. Knutton. 2004. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells: role of bundle-forming pili (BFP), EspA filaments and intimin. Microbiology 150:527-538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Delahay, R. M., G. Frankel, and S. Knutton. 2001. Intimate interactions of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli at the host cell surface. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 14:559-565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Donnenberg, M. S., J. A. Giron, J. P. Nataro, and J. B. Kaper. 1992. A plasmid-encoded type IV fimbrial gene of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli associated with localized adherence. Mol. Microbiol. 6:3427-3437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Donnenberg, M. S., and J. B. Kaper. 1992. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 60:3953-3961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Donnenberg, M. S., and T. S. Whittam. 2001. Pathogenesis and evolution of virulence in enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Investig. 107:539-548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Giron, J. A., A. S. Ho, and G. K. Schoolnik. 1993. Characterization of fimbriae produced by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 175:7391-7403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Giron, J. A., A. G. Torres, E. Freer, and J. B. Kaper. 2002. The flagella of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli mediate adherence to epithelial cells. Mol. Microbiol. 44:361-379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hicks, S., G. Frankel, J. B. Kaper, G. Dougan, and A. D. Phillips. 1998. Role of intimin and bundle-forming pili in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli adhesion to pediatric intestinal tissue in vitro. Infect. Immun. 66:1570-1578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hyland, R., T. P. Griener, G. L. Mulvey, P. I. Kitov, O. P. Srivastava, P. Marcato, and G. D. Armstrong. 2006. Basis for N-acetyllactosamine-mediated inhibition of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli localized adherence. J. Med. Microbiol. 55:669-675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kenny, B. 2002. Mechanism of action of EPEC type III effector molecules. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 291:469-477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Knutton, S., I. Rosenshine, M. J. Pallen, I. Nisan, B. C. Neves, C. Bain, C. Wolff, G. Dougan, and G. Frankel. 1998. A novel EspA-associated surface organelle of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli involved in protein translocation into epithelial cells. EMBO J. 17:2166-2176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Leverton, L. Q., and J. B. Kaper. 2005. Temporal expression of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence genes in an in vitro model of infection. Infect. Immun. 73:1034-1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nataro, J. P., and J. B. Kaper. 1998. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:142-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Phillips, A. D., and G. Frankel. 2000. Intimin-mediated tissue specificity in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli interaction with human intestinal organ cultures. J. Infect. Dis. 181:1496-1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sinclair, J. F., and A. D. O'Brien. 2002. Cell surface-localized nucleolin is a eukaryotic receptor for the adhesin intimin-gamma of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2876-2885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vanmaele, R. P., M. C. Finlayson, and G. D. Armstrong. 1995. Effect of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli on adherent properties of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Infect. Immun. 63:191-198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vanmaele, R. P., L. D. Heerze, and G. D. Armstrong. 1999. Role of lactosyl glycan sequences in inhibiting enteropathogenic Escherichia coli attachment. Infect. Immun. 67:3302-3307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wu, Y., B. Lau, S. Smith, K. Troyan, and D. E. Barnett Foster. 2004. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection triggers host phospholipid metabolism perturbations. Infect. Immun. 72:6764-6772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES