Skip to main content
British Medical Journal logoLink to British Medical Journal
. 1979 Oct 27;2(6197):1028–1031. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6197.1028

Return to work and quality of life after surgery for coronary artery disease.

S Westaby, R N Sapsford, H H Bentall
PMCID: PMC1596843  PMID: 316348

Abstract

Changes in work capability and quality of life were assessed retrospectively in 130 patients with ischaemic heart disease who had undergone aortocoronary bypass operations during 1976-7 because of medically uncontrollable angina. A total of 85 patients (65.4%) reported complete relief from angina six months after operation, though 12 later suffered a recurrence. Substantially fewer patients needed drugs after the operation. Before operation 9 out of 117 men fully employed at the onset of angina were working without restriction or doing lighter, fulltime work, 38 were at work but seriously incapacitated by angina, and 70 were forced to stop work. After operation 70 were working without restriction or engaged in lighter work, 15 were at work but still restricted by angina, and only 32 were forced to stop work. This result was highly significant (P less than 0.001). These differences were even more pronounced in heavy manual workers, of whom none cobld work normally before operation, whereas 16 were working without restriction afterwards. Of patients wishing to engage in hobbies or sports, social activity, and sexual intercourse but were restricted before operation, about two-thirds could resume these activities afterwards. Coronary artery surgery provided dramatic symptomatic relief in up to 90% of patients and permitted rehabilitation and return to gainful employment irrespective of type of labour. The degree of symptomatic improvement and increase in exercise tolerance after successful surgery is usually far greater than occurs with any other form of treatment and directly improves quality of life and work capability.

Full text

PDF
1028

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Johnson W. D., Kayser K. L. An expanded indication for coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1973 Jul;16(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)65805-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Miller R. R., DeMaria A. N., Amsterdam E. A., Mailander M. M., Zelis R., Lurie A. J., Mason D. T. Improvement of reduced left ventricular diastolic compliance in ischemic heart disease after successful coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1975 Jan;35(1):11–16. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(75)90552-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mundth E. D., Austen W. G. Surgical measures for coronary heart disease (third of three parts). N Engl J Med. 1975 Jul 17;293(3):124–130. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197507172930306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Spencer F. C., Isom O. W., Glassman E., Boyd A. D., Engelman R. M., Reed G. E., Pasternack B. S., Dembrow J. M. The long-term influence of coronary bypass grafts on myocardial infarction and survival. Ann Surg. 1974 Oct;180(4):439–451. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197410000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES