Skip to main content
British Medical Journal logoLink to British Medical Journal
. 1980 Feb 23;280(6213):509–512. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6213.509

Assessment of fitness for surgical procedures and the variability of anaesthetists' judgments.

M E Wilson, N B WIlliams, P J Baskett, J A Bennett, A M Skene
PMCID: PMC1601404  PMID: 7370563

Abstract

Ten anaesthetists were asked to make judgments on fitness for elective operation on data derived from 200 patients. The extent of their agreement was measured using a kappa statistic, and clusters of anaesthetists who agreed well with each other were identified. Using an alternative technique, the "true" fitness category of each patient was estimated using a maximum likelihood method which estimated the error involved in making judgments on limited amounts of information. It was possible to compare the performance of each anaesthetist against the consensus and to measure deviation on an "optimism--pessimism" continuum. A simple questionnaire predicted fitness for operation by all 10 anaesthetists in 96% of cases.

Full text

PDF
509

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Goldman L., Caldera D. L., Nussbaum S. R., Southwick F. S., Krogstad D., Murray B., Burke D. S., O'Malley T. A., Goroll A. H., Caplan C. H. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1977 Oct 20;297(16):845–850. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197710202971601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Keats A. S. The ASA classification of physical status--a recapitulation. Anesthesiology. 1978 Oct;49(4):233–236. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197810000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McNeil B. J., Keller E., Adelstein S. J. Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1975 Jul 31;293(5):211–215. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197507312930501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Owens W. D., Felts J. A., Spitznagel E. L., Jr ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology. 1978 Oct;49(4):239–243. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197810000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES