Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 2006 Oct 14;333(7572):808. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7572.808

MRI in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer

New dilemma in multidisciplinary team management

R J Heald 1, Brian D P O'Neill 2, Brendan Moran 2, Gina Brown 3, Ara W Darzi 3, Andrew C Wotherspoon 3, David Cunningham 3, Diana M Tait 3
PMCID: PMC1601982  PMID: 17038746

Editor—Tumour shrinkage by preoperative chemoradiotherapy is now an everyday reality, and pathological complete responses are not uncommon.1 A “new dilemma” is posed by the apparent complete disappearance of cancer on magnetic resonance imaging, and often clinically, after chemoradiotherapy. A delay of six to 10 weeks is usual before operating—a time perceived as a “window of opportunity,” as regrowth in the irradiated area is believed inevitable.

This concept has been challenged by a series by Habr-Gama et al.2 Altogether 360 patients with T3 and T4 rectal cancer (or T2 when considered for abdominoperineal resection) were treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.3 Ninety nine patients (28%) classified as clinical complete responders at eight weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy were managed by surveillance alone. Only 2% in this observation group have died of cancer in a follow-up extending for up to 10 years, whereas local recurrence occurred in just five patients, all amenable to successful salvage surgery.

We propose to open accrual into a pilot study of observation for complete responders, as assessed on magnetic resonance imaging at four weeks after completing chemoradiotherapy. This will be administered at the Pelican Centre and largely delivered at the Royal Marsden Hospital. Magnetic resonance imaging, whose excellence in accurately predicting surgical mesorectal margins has been shown by the MERCURY group,4,5 will be central to this study's intensive follow-up, in addition to regular clinical and sigmoidoscopic assessment.

Specialised primary surgery, backed by magnetic resonance imaging based selection for preoperative chemoradiotherapy, will continue to be the cornerstone of management. Nevertheless, our fundamental understanding of modern cancer treatment for all solid tumours demands that this group of complete responders be properly investigated. Furthermore, if the experience of Habr-Gama et al is confirmed, several hundred patients with rectal cancer in the United Kingdom each year may one day be spared the necessity for major surgery.

Competing interests: None declared.

See Research p 779

References

  • 1.Chau I, Brown G, Cunningham D, Tait D, Wotherspoon A, Norman AR, et al. Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin followed by synchronous chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision in magnetic resonance imaging—defined poor-risk rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24: 668-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W, Sabbaga J, Ribeiro U Jr, Silva e Sousa AH Jr, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 2004;240: 711-7; discussion 717-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Habr-Gama A. Assessment and management of the complete clinical response of rectal cancer to chemoradiotherapy. Colorectal Dis 2006;8(suppl 3): 21-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.MERCURY Study Group. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting surgical resection margin status: prospective observational study. BMJ 2006;333: doi: 10.1136/bmj.38937.646400.55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Brown G, Daniels IR. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: the MERCURY research project. Recent Results Cancer Res 2005;165: 58-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES