Abstract
Analysis of the records of the last 450 outpatients referred to me showed that the basic disorder of at least one in three lay in the psyche, and there was a large emotional element in many of the others. None were put on a waiting list for admission. Not only should physicians be generalists most of the time (whether or not they have a special interest) but most medical problems are best dealt with by the GP. Only occasionally can the physician attach a precise diagnosis to a patient who has been an obscure problem to his GP, and the physician's most important function is to reassure the patient and explain his symptoms. Routine investigations seldom benefit the patient. If there could be a more equitable distribution of GPs of high quality with good back-up facilities fewer general and many fewer specialist physicians would be needed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Korvin C. C., Pearce R. H., Stanley J. Admissions screening: clinical benefits. Ann Intern Med. 1975 Aug;83(2):197–203. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-83-2-197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TODD J. W. Specialization. Lancet. 1951 Feb 24;1(6652):462–467. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(51)92054-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TODD J. W. The value of electrocardiography when coronary-artery disease is suspected. Lancet. 1959 Apr 25;1(7078):845–848. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(59)91935-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Todd J. W. Priorities in medicine. Lancet. 1973 May 19;1(7812):1106–1110. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)90410-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]