Skip to main content
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1994 Apr;6(4):487–500. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.4.487

Genetic and molecular analysis of an allelic series of cop1 mutants suggests functional roles for the multiple protein domains.

T W McNellis 1, A G von Arnim 1, T Araki 1, Y Komeda 1, S Miséra 1, X W Deng 1
PMCID: PMC160452  PMID: 8205001

Abstract

The Arabidopsis protein COP1, encoded by the constitutive photomorphogenic locus 1, is an essential regulatory molecule that plays a role in the repression of photomorphogenic development in darkness and in the ability of light-grown plants to respond to photoperiod, end-of-day far-red treatment, and ratio of red/far-red light. The COP1 protein contains three recognizable structural domains: starting from the N terminus, they are the zinc binding motif, the putative coiled-coil region, and the domain with multiple WD-40 repeats homologous to the beta subunit of trimeric G-proteins (G beta). To understand the functional implications of these structural motifs, 17 recessive mutations of the COP1 gene have been isolated based on their constitutive photomorphogenic seedling development in darkness. These mutations define three phenotypic classes: weak, strong, and lethal. The mutations that fall into the lethal class are possible null mutations of COP1. Molecular analysis of the nine mutant alleles that accumulated mutated forms of COP1 protein revealed that disruption of the G beta-protein homology domain or removal of the very C-terminal 56 amino acids are both deleterious to COP1 function. In-frame deletions or insertions of short amino acid stretches between the putative coiled-coil and G beta-protein homology domains strongly compromised COP1 function. However, a mutation resulting in a COP1 protein with only the N-terminal 282 amino acids, including both the zinc binding and the coiled-coil domains, produced a weak phenotypic defect. These results indicated that the N-terminal half of COP1 alone retains some activity and a disrupted C-terminal domain masks this remaining activity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahmad M., Cashmore A. R. HY4 gene of A. thaliana encodes a protein with characteristics of a blue-light photoreceptor. Nature. 1993 Nov 11;366(6451):162–166. doi: 10.1038/366162a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chamovitz D., Sandmann G., Hirschberg J. Molecular and biochemical characterization of herbicide-resistant mutants of cyanobacteria reveals that phytoene desaturation is a rate-limiting step in carotenoid biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 1993 Aug 15;268(23):17348–17353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chory J., Nagpal P., Peto C. A. Phenotypic and Genetic Analysis of det2, a New Mutant That Affects Light-Regulated Seedling Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1991 May;3(5):445–459. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.5.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chory J. Out of darkness: mutants reveal pathways controlling light-regulated development in plants. Trends Genet. 1993 May;9(5):167–172. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90163-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chory J., Peto C., Feinbaum R., Pratt L., Ausubel F. Arabidopsis thaliana mutant that develops as a light-grown plant in the absence of light. Cell. 1989 Sep 8;58(5):991–999. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90950-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Deng X. W., Caspar T., Quail P. H. cop1: a regulatory locus involved in light-controlled development and gene expression in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1172–1182. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng X. W. Fresh view of light signal transduction in plants. Cell. 1994 Feb 11;76(3):423–426. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90107-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Deng X. W., Matsui M., Wei N., Wagner D., Chu A. M., Feldmann K. A., Quail P. H. COP1, an Arabidopsis regulatory gene, encodes a protein with both a zinc-binding motif and a G beta homologous domain. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):791–801. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90555-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dynlacht B. D., Weinzierl R. O., Admon A., Tjian R. The dTAFII80 subunit of Drosophila TFIID contains beta-transducin repeats. Nature. 1993 May 13;363(6425):176–179. doi: 10.1038/363176a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilmartin P. M., Sarokin L., Memelink J., Chua N. H. Molecular light switches for plant genes. Plant Cell. 1990 May;2(5):369–378. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.5.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hou Y., Von Arnim A. G., Deng X. W. A New Class of Arabidopsis Constitutive Photomorphogenic Genes Involved in Regulating Cotyledon Development. Plant Cell. 1993 Mar;5(3):329–339. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.3.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaufman L. S., Roberts L. L., Briggs W. R., Thompson W. F. Phytochrome Control of Specific mRNA levels in Developing Pea Buds : Kinetics of Accumulation, Reciprocity, and Escape Kinetics of the Low Fluence Response. Plant Physiol. 1986 Aug;81(4):1033–1038. doi: 10.1104/pp.81.4.1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lupas A., Van Dyke M., Stock J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science. 1991 May 24;252(5009):1162–1164. doi: 10.1126/science.252.5009.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Neuhaus G., Bowler C., Kern R., Chua N. H. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent and -independent phytochrome signal transduction pathways. Cell. 1993 Jun 4;73(5):937–952. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90272-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Quail P. H. Phytochrome: a light-activated molecular switch that regulates plant gene expression. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:389–409. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.002133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Romero L. C., Lam E. Guanine nucleotide binding protein involvement in early steps of phytochrome-regulated gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 15;90(4):1465–1469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Warpeha K. M., Hamm H. E., Rasenick M. M., Kaufman L. S. A blue-light-activated GTP-binding protein in the plasma membranes of etiolated peas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 15;88(20):8925–8929. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.8925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wei N., Deng X. W. COP9: a new genetic locus involved in light-regulated development and gene expression in arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1992 Dec;4(12):1507–1518. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.12.1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. van der Voorn L., Ploegh H. L. The WD-40 repeat. FEBS Lett. 1992 Jul 28;307(2):131–134. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80751-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. von Arnim A. G., Deng X. W. Ring finger motif of Arabidopsis thaliana COP1 defines a new class of zinc-binding domain. J Biol Chem. 1993 Sep 15;268(26):19626–19631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES