Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1994 Oct;6(10):1467–1475. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.10.1467

Two classes of homeodomain proteins specify the multiple a mating types of the mushroom Coprinus cinereus.

U Kües 1, R N Asante-Owusu 1, E S Mutasa 1, A M Tymon 1, E H Pardo 1, S F O'Shea 1, B Göttgens 1, L A Casselton 1
PMCID: PMC160534  PMID: 7994179

Abstract

The A mating type locus of the mushroom Coprinus cinereus regulates essential steps in sexual development. The locus is complex and contains several functionally redundant, multiallelic genes that encode putative transcription factors. Here, we compare four genes from an A locus designated A42. Overall, the DNA sequences are very different (approximately 50% homology), but two classes of genes can be distinguished on the basis of a conserved homeodomain motif in their predicted proteins (HD1 and HD2). Development is postulated to be triggered by an HD1 and an HD2 gene from different A loci. Thus, proteins encoded by genes of the same locus must be distinguished from those encoded by another locus. Individual proteins of both classes recognize each other using the region N-terminal to the homeodomain. These N-terminal specificity regions (COP1 and COP2) are predicted to be helical and are potential dimerization interfaces. The amino acid composition of the C-terminal regions of HD1 proteins suggests a role in activation, and gene truncations indicate that this region is essential for function in vivo. A corresponding C-terminal region in HD2 proteins can be dispensed with in vivo. We will discuss these predicted structural features of the C. cinereus A proteins, their proposed interactions following a compatible cell fusion, and their similarities to the a1 and alpha 2 mating type proteins of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (828.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakkeren G., Kronstad J. W. Conservation of the b mating-type gene complex among bipolar and tetrapolar smut fungi. Plant Cell. 1993 Jan;5(1):123–136. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Binninger D. M., Skrzynia C., Pukkila P. J., Casselton L. A. DNA-mediated transformation of the basidiomycete Coprinus cinereus. EMBO J. 1987 Apr;6(4):835–840. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04828.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Day P R. The Structure of the a Mating Type Locus in Coprinus Lagopus. Genetics. 1960 May;45(5):641–650. doi: 10.1093/genetics/45.5.641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dolan J. W., Fields S. Cell-type-specific transcription in yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Feb 16;1088(2):155–169. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(91)90051-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dranginis A. M. Binding of yeast a1 and alpha 2 as a heterodimer to the operator DNA of a haploid-specific gene. Nature. 1990 Oct 18;347(6294):682–685. doi: 10.1038/347682a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gillissen B., Bergemann J., Sandmann C., Schroeer B., Bölker M., Kahmann R. A two-component regulatory system for self/non-self recognition in Ustilago maydis. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):647–657. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90141-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gish W., States D. J. Identification of protein coding regions by database similarity search. Nat Genet. 1993 Mar;3(3):266–272. doi: 10.1038/ng0393-266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goutte C., Johnson A. D. Yeast a1 and alpha 2 homeodomain proteins form a DNA-binding activity with properties distinct from those of either protein. J Mol Biol. 1993 Oct 5;233(3):359–371. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ho C. Y., Adamson J. G., Hodges R. S., Smith M. Heterodimerization of the yeast MATa1 and MAT alpha 2 proteins is mediated by two leucine zipper-like coiled-coil motifs. EMBO J. 1994 Mar 15;13(6):1403–1413. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06394.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kües U., Göttgens B., Stratmann R., Richardson W. V., O'Shea S. F., Casselton L. A. A chimeric homeodomain protein causes self-compatibility and constitutive sexual development in the mushroom Coprinus cinereus. EMBO J. 1994 Sep 1;13(17):4054–4059. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06722.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leuther K. K., Salmeron J. M., Johnston S. A. Genetic evidence that an activation domain of GAL4 does not require acidity and may form a beta sheet. Cell. 1993 Feb 26;72(4):575–585. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90076-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mak A., Johnson A. D. The carboxy-terminal tail of the homeo domain protein alpha 2 is required for function with a second homeo domain protein. Genes Dev. 1993 Oct;7(10):1862–1870. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.10.1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nicosia A., Tafi R., Monaci P. Trans-dominant inhibition of transcription activator LFB1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Oct 25;20(20):5321–5328. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.20.5321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ray F. A., Nickoloff J. A. Site-specific mutagenesis of almost any plasmid using a PCR-based version of unique site elimination. Biotechniques. 1992 Sep;13(3):342–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Specht C. A., Stankis M. M., Giasson L., Novotny C. P., Ullrich R. C. Functional analysis of the homeodomain-related proteins of the A alpha locus of Schizophyllum commune. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 1;89(15):7174–7178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.7174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stankis M. M., Specht C. A., Yang H., Giasson L., Ullrich R. C., Novotny C. P. The A alpha mating locus of Schizophyllum commune encodes two dissimilar multiallelic homeodomain proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 1;89(15):7169–7173. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.7169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sutherland J. A., Cook A., Bannister A. J., Kouzarides T. Conserved motifs in Fos and Jun define a new class of activation domain. Genes Dev. 1992 Sep;6(9):1810–1819. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.9.1810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tronche F., Yaniv M. HNF1, a homeoprotein member of the hepatic transcription regulatory network. Bioessays. 1992 Sep;14(9):579–587. doi: 10.1002/bies.950140902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vollbrecht E., Veit B., Sinha N., Hake S. The developmental gene Knotted-1 is a member of a maize homeobox gene family. Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):241–243. doi: 10.1038/350241a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wegner M., Drolet D. W., Rosenfeld M. G. POU-domain proteins: structure and function of developmental regulators. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1993 Jun;5(3):488–498. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(93)90015-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yee A. R., Kronstad J. W. Construction of chimeric alleles with altered specificity at the b incompatibility locus of Ustilago maydis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jan 15;90(2):664–668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.2.664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES