Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1994 Mar;104(3):997–1006. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.3.997

Promoters from genes for plastid proteins possess regions with different sensitivities toward red and blue light.

T Lübberstedt 1, C E Bolle 1, S Sopory 1, K Flieger 1, R G Herrmann 1, R Oelmüller 1
PMCID: PMC160698  PMID: 8165263

Abstract

The light-regulated expression of eight nuclear-encoded genes for plastid proteins from spinach (Spinacia oleracea) (RBCS-1 and CAB-1; ATPC and ATPD, encoding the subunits gamma and delta of the ATP synthase; PC and FNR; PSAD and PSAF, encoding the subunits II and III of photosystem I reaction center) was analyzed with promoter/beta-glucuronidase (GUS) gene fusions in transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum and Nicotiana plumbaginifolia) seedlings and mature plants under standardized light and growth conditions. Unique response patterns were found for each of these promoters. GUS activities differed more than 30-fold. Strong promoters were found for the PC and PSAD genes. On the other hand, the ATPC promoter was relatively weak. Expression of the CAB/GUS gene fusion in etiolated material was at the detection limit; all other chimeric genes were expressed in the dark as well. Light stimulation of GUS activities ranged from 3- (FNR promoter) to more than 100-fold (CAB-1 promoter). The FNR promoter responded only to red light (RL) and not significantly to blue light (BL), whereas the PC promoter contained regions with different sensitivities toward RL and BL. Furthermore, different RNA accumulation kinetics were observed for the PSAF, CAB, FNR, and PC promoter/GUS gene fusions during de-etiolation, which, at least in the case of the PSAF gene, differed from the regulation of the corresponding endogenous genes in spinach and tobacco. The results suggest either that not all cis elements determining light-regulated and quantitative expression are present on the spinach promoter fragments used or that the spinach cis-regulatory elements respond differently to the host (tobacco) regulatory pathway(s). Furthermore, as in tobacco, but not in spinach, the trans-gene hardly responds to single light pulses that operate through phytochrome. Taken together, the results suggest that the genes have been independently translocated from the organelle to the nucleus during phylogeny. Furthermore, each gene seems to have acquired a unique set of regulatory elements.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong G. A., Weisshaar B., Hahlbrock K. Homodimeric and heterodimeric leucine zipper proteins and nuclear factors from parsley recognize diverse promoter elements with ACGT cores. Plant Cell. 1992 May;4(5):525–537. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.5.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bichler J., Herrmann R. G. Analysis of the promotors of the single-copy genes for plastocyanin and subunit delta of the chloroplast ATP synthase from spinach. Eur J Biochem. 1990 Jun 20;190(2):415–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb15591.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bodine D. M., Ley T. J. An enhancer element lies 3' to the human A gamma globin gene. EMBO J. 1987 Oct;6(10):2997–3004. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02605.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brinster R. L., Allen J. M., Behringer R. R., Gelinas R. E., Palmiter R. D. Introns increase transcriptional efficiency in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Feb;85(3):836–840. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.3.836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Callis J., Fromm M., Walbot V. Introns increase gene expression in cultured maize cells. Genes Dev. 1987 Dec;1(10):1183–1200. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.10.1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Choi O. R., Engel J. D. A 3' enhancer is required for temporal and tissue-specific transcriptional activation of the chicken adult beta-globin gene. Nature. 1986 Oct 23;323(6090):731–734. doi: 10.1038/323731a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Datta N., Cashmore A. R. Binding of a pea nuclear protein to promoters of certain photoregulated genes is modulated by phosphorylation. Plant Cell. 1989 Nov;1(11):1069–1077. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.11.1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. DeLisle A. J., Ferl R. J. Characterization of the Arabidopsis Adh G-box binding factor. Plant Cell. 1990 Jun;2(6):547–557. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.6.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dean C., Favreau M., Bedbrook J., Dunsmuir P. Sequences 5' to translation start regulate expression of petunia rbcS genes. Plant Cell. 1989 Feb;1(2):209–215. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.2.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dean C., Favreau M., Bond-Nutter D., Bedbrook J., Dunsmuir P. Sequences downstream of translation start regulate quantitative expression of two petunia rbcS genes. Plant Cell. 1989 Feb;1(2):201–208. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.2.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dean C., Favreau M., Dunsmuir P., Bedbrook J. Confirmation of the relative expression levels of the Petunia (Mitchell) rbcS genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Jun 11;15(11):4655–4668. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.11.4655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Deng X. W., Caspar T., Quail P. H. cop1: a regulatory locus involved in light-controlled development and gene expression in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 1991 Jul;5(7):1172–1182. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.7.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Flieger K., Tyagi A., Sopory S., Cseplö A., Hermann R. G., Oelmüller R. A 42 bp promoter fragment of the gene for subunit III of photosystem I (psaF) is crucial for its activity. Plant J. 1993 Jul;4(1):9–17. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04010009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fluhr R., Chua N. H. Developmental regulation of two genes encoding ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit in pea and transgenic petunia plants: Phytochrome response and blue-light induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Apr;83(8):2358–2362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Frances S., White M. J., Edgerton M. D., Jones A. M., Elliott R. C., Thompson W. F. Initial characterization of a pea mutant with light-independent photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell. 1992 Dec;4(12):1519–1530. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.12.1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gallo-Meagher M., Sowinski D. A., Elliott R. C., Thompson W. F. Both internal and external regulatory elements control expression of the pea Fed-1 gene in transgenic tobacco seedlings. Plant Cell. 1992 Apr;4(4):389–395. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.4.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gallo-Meagher M., Sowinski D. A., Thompson W. F. The pea ferredoxin I gene exhibits different light responses in pea and tobacco. Plant Cell. 1992 Apr;4(4):383–388. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.4.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gilmartin P. M., Sarokin L., Memelink J., Chua N. H. Molecular light switches for plant genes. Plant Cell. 1990 May;2(5):369–378. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.5.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Giuliano G., Pichersky E., Malik V. S., Timko M. P., Scolnik P. A., Cashmore A. R. An evolutionarily conserved protein binding sequence upstream of a plant light-regulated gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(19):7089–7093. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.19.7089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jefferson R. A., Kavanagh T. A., Bevan M. W. GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 1987 Dec 20;6(13):3901–3907. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02730.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kay S. A., Keith B., Shinozaki K., Chye M. L., Chua N. H. The rice phytochrome gene: structure, autoregulated expression, and binding of GT-1 to a conserved site in the 5' upstream region. Plant Cell. 1989 Mar;1(3):351–360. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.3.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Luan S., Bogorad L. A rice cab gene promoter contains separate cis-acting elements that regulate expression in dicot and monocot plants. Plant Cell. 1992 Aug;4(8):971–981. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.8.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Marrs K. A., Kaufman L. S. Blue-light regulation of transcription for nuclear genes in pea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jun;86(12):4492–4495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.12.4492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oelmüller R., Bolle C., Tyagi A. K., Niekrawietz N., Breit S., Herrmann R. G. Characterization of the promoter from the single-copy gene encoding ferredoxin-NADP(+)-oxidoreductase from spinach. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 Feb;237(1-2):261–272. doi: 10.1007/BF00282808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Oelmüller R., Briggs W. R. Intact plastids are required for nitrate- and light-induced accumulation of nitrate reductase activity and mRNA in squash cotyledons. Plant Physiol. 1990 Feb;92(2):434–439. doi: 10.1104/pp.92.2.434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Oelmüller R., Kendrick R. E. Blue light is required for survival of the tomato phytochrome-deficient aurea mutant and the expression of four nuclear genes coding for plastidic proteins. Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Feb;16(2):293–299. doi: 10.1007/BF00020560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Oelmüller R., Kendrick R. E., Briggs W. R. Blue-light mediated accumulation of nuclear-encoded transcripts coding for proteins of the thylakoid membrane is absent in the phytochrome-deficient aurea mutant of tomato. Plant Mol Biol. 1989 Aug;13(2):223–232. doi: 10.1007/BF00016140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pancic P. G., Strotmann H. Structure of the nuclear encoded gamma subunit of CF0CF1 of the diatom Odontella sinensis including its presequence. FEBS Lett. 1993 Mar 29;320(1):61–66. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81658-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Salinas J., Oeda K., Chua N. H. Two G-box-related sequences confer different expression patterns in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell. 1992 Dec;4(12):1485–1493. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.12.1485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sarokin L. P., Chua N. H. Binding sites for two novel phosphoproteins, 3AF5 and 3AF3, are required for rbcS-3A expression. Plant Cell. 1992 Apr;4(4):473–483. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.4.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schulze-Lefert P., Becker-André M., Schulz W., Hahlbrock K., Dangl J. L. Functional architecture of the light-responsive chalcone synthase promoter from parsley. Plant Cell. 1989 Jul;1(7):707–714. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.7.707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stockhaus J., Eckes P., Rocha-Sosa M., Schell J., Willmitzer L. Analysis of cis-active sequences involved in the leaf-specific expression of a potato gene in transgenic plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Nov;84(22):7943–7947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.22.7943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thornburg R. W., An G., Cleveland T. E., Johnson R., Ryan C. A. Wound-inducible expression of a potato inhibitor II-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene fusion in transgenic tobacco plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Feb;84(3):744–748. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.3.744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Trainor C. D., Stamler S. J., Engel J. D. Erythroid-specific transcription of the chicken histone H5 gene is directed by a 3' enhancer. 1987 Aug 27-Sep 2Nature. 328(6133):827–830. doi: 10.1038/328827a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ueda T., Pichersky E., Malik V. S., Cashmore A. R. Level of expression of the tomato rbcS-3A gene is modulated by a far upstream promoter element in a developmentally regulated manner. Plant Cell. 1989 Feb;1(2):217–227. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.2.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wehmeyer B., Cashmore A. R., Schäfer E. Photocontrol of the Expression of Genes Encoding Chlorophyll a/b Binding Proteins and Small Subunit of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase in Etiolated Seedlings of Lycopersicon esculentum (L.) and Nicotiana tabacum (L.). Plant Physiol. 1990 Jul;93(3):990–997. doi: 10.1104/pp.93.3.990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wei N., Deng X. W. COP9: a new genetic locus involved in light-regulated development and gene expression in arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1992 Dec;4(12):1507–1518. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.12.1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Weisshaar B., Armstrong G. A., Block A., da Costa e Silva O., Hahlbrock K. Light-inducible and constitutively expressed DNA-binding proteins recognizing a plant promoter element with functional relevance in light responsiveness. EMBO J. 1991 Jul;10(7):1777–1786. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07702.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES