Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1994 Mar;104(3):1033–1041. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.3.1033

Recovery from Photoinhibition in Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Acclimated to Varying Growth Irradiances (Role of D1 Protein Turnover).

E M Aro 1, S McCaffery 1, J M Anderson 1
PMCID: PMC160702  PMID: 12232146

Abstract

D1 protein turnover and restoration of the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) after photoinhibition of pea leaves (Pisum sativum L. cv Greenfeast) acclimated to different light intensities were investigated. All peas acclimated to different light intensities were able to recover from photoinhibition, at least partially, at light intensities far above their growth light irradiance. However, the capacity of pea leaves to recover from photoinhibition under increasing high irradiances was strictly dependent on the light acclimation of the leaves; i.e. the higher the irradiance during growth, the better the capacity of pea leaves to recover from photoinhibition at moderate and high light. In our experimental conditions, mainly D1 protein turnover-dependent recovery was monitored, since in the presence of an inhibitor of chloroplast-encoded protein synthesis, lincomycin, only negligible recovery took place. In darkness, neither the restoration of PSII photochemical efficiency nor any notable degradation of damaged D1 protein took place. In low light, however, good recovery of PSII occurred in all peas acclimated to different light intensities and was accompanied by fast degradation of the D1 protein. The rate of degradation of the D1 protein was estimated to be 3 to 4 times faster in photoinhibited leaves than in nonphotoinhibited leaves under the recovery conditions of 50 [mu]mol of photons m-2 s-1. In moderate light of 400 [mu]mol of photons m-2 s-1, the photoinhibited low-light peas were not able to increase further the rate of D1 protein degradation above that observed in nonphotoinhibited leaves, nor was the restoration of PSII function possible. On the other hand, photoinhibited high-light leaves were able to increase the rate of D1 protein degradation above that of nonphotoinhibited leaves even in moderate and high light, ensuring at least partial restoration of PSII function. We conclude that the capacity of photoinhibited leaves to restore PSII function at different irradiances was directly related to the capacity of the leaves to degrade damaged D1 protein under the recovery conditions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adamska I., Kloppstech K., Ohad I. Early light-inducible protein in pea is stable during light stress but is degraded during recovery at low light intensity. J Biol Chem. 1993 Mar 15;268(8):5438–5444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamska I., Ohad I., Kloppstech K. Synthesis of the early light-inducible protein is controlled by blue light and related to light stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 1;89(7):2610–2613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.7.2610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aro E. M., Virgin I., Andersson B. Photoinhibition of Photosystem II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Jul 5;1143(2):113–134. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(93)90134-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Danon A., Mayfield S. P. Light regulated translational activators: identification of chloroplast gene specific mRNA binding proteins. EMBO J. 1991 Dec;10(13):3993–4001. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04974.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kettunen R., Tyystjärvi E., Aro E. M. D1 protein degradation during photoinhibition of intact leaves. A modification of the D1 protein precedes degradation. FEBS Lett. 1991 Sep 23;290(1-2):153–156. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)81247-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ljungberg U., Akerlund H. E., Andersson B. Isolation and characterization of the 10-kDa and 22-kDa polypeptides of higher plant photosystem 2. Eur J Biochem. 1986 Aug 1;158(3):477–482. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Paterson D. R., Wittwer S. H., Weller L. E., Sell H. M. The Effect of Preharvest Foliar Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sprout Inhibition and Storage Quality of Potatoes. Plant Physiol. 1952 Jan;27(1):135–142. doi: 10.1104/pp.27.1.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schuster G., Timberg R., Ohad I. Turnover of thylakoid photosystem II proteins during photoinhibition of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eur J Biochem. 1988 Nov 1;177(2):403–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14389.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sundby C., McCaffery S., Anderson J. M. Turnover of the photosystem II D1 protein in higher plants under photoinhibitory and nonphotoinhibitory irradiance. J Biol Chem. 1993 Dec 5;268(34):25476–25482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES