Skip to main content
British Medical Journal logoLink to British Medical Journal
. 1978 Aug 26;2(6137):591–593. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6137.591

Ambulation in labour.

A M Flynn, J Kelly, G Hollins, P F Lynch
PMCID: PMC1607519  PMID: 698606

Abstract

In a randomised prospective study of 68 women in spontaneous labour half were allocated to an ambulant group and half to a recumbent group. The duration of labour was significantly shorter, the need for analgesia significantly less, and the incidence of fetal heart abnormalities significantly smaller in the ambulant group than in the recumbent group. Apgar scores at one and five minutes were also significantly greater in the ambulant group. More patients in the recumbent group required augmentations with oxytocic drugs. There was no statistically significant difference in the third stage loss in the two groups. Ambulation in labour should be encouraged: it may bring human benefits while allowing the advantages of hospital supervision.

Full text

PDF
591

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. McManus T. J., Calder A. A. Upright posture and the efficiency of labour. Lancet. 1978 Jan 14;1(8055):72–74. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Méndez-Bauer C., Arroyo J., García Ramos C., Menéndez A., Lavilla M., Izquierdo F., Villa Elízaga I., Zamarriego J. Effects of standing position on spontaneous uterine contractility and other aspects of labor. J Perinat Med. 1975;3(2):89–100. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1975.3.2.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Posture in labour. Lancet. 1978 Mar 4;1(8062):496–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES