Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1995 Sep;7(9):1445–1457. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.9.1445

Identification of a sequence-specific DNA binding factor required for transcription of the barley chloroplast blue light-responsive psbD-psbC promoter.

M Kim 1, J E Mullet 1
PMCID: PMC160969  PMID: 8589628

Abstract

The plastid gene psbD encodes the photosystem II reaction center chlorophyll protein D2. psbD is located in a complex operon that includes psbC, psbK, psbl, orf62, and trnG. The operon is transcribed from at least three different promoters. One of the psbD promoters is differentially activated when plants are exposed to blue light. In this study, the psbD blue light-responsive promoter was accurately transcribed in vitro in high-salt extracts of barley plastids. Transcription required supercoiled templates and was inhibited by tagetitoxin, an inhibitor of plastid transcription. Escherichia coli RNA polymerase did not recognize the psbD light-responsive promoter with the same specificity as plastid RNA polymerase. Deletion analyses demonstrated that sequences between -39 and -68, upstream of the transcription initiation site, were required for transcription of the psbD blue light-responsive promoter. This DNA region is highly conserved among plant species and contains multiple AAG sequences. Gel shift assays and DNase I footprinting experiments demonstrated that the AAG-rich DNA sequence interacts with a sequence-specific DNA binding factor termed AGF. Point mutations in the AAG cis element decreased binding of AGF and inhibited transcription from the psbD light-responsive promoter. We concluded that AGF is an essential factor required for transcription of the psbD light-responsive promoter.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baeza L., Bertrand A., Mache R., Lerbs-Mache S. Characterization of a protein binding sequence in the promoter region of the 16S rRNA gene of the spinach chloroplast genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Jul 11;19(13):3577–3581. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.13.3577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baumgartner B. J., Rapp J. C., Mullet J. E. Plastid Genes Encoding the Transcription/Translation Apparatus Are Differentially Transcribed Early in Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Chloroplast Development (Evidence for Selective Stabilization of psbA mRNA). Plant Physiol. 1993 Mar;101(3):781–791. doi: 10.1104/pp.101.3.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berends Sexton T., Jones J. T., Mullet J. E. Sequence and transcriptional analysis of the barley ctDNA region upstream of psbD-psbC encoding trnK(UUU), rps16, trnQ(UUG), psbK, psbI, and trnS(GCU). Curr Genet. 1990 May;17(5):445–454. doi: 10.1007/BF00334526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyer S. K., Mullet J. E. Sequence and transcript map of barley chloroplast psbA gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Aug 25;16(16):8184–8184. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.16.8184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen L. J., Orozco E. M., Jr Recognition of prokaryotic transcription terminators by spinach chloroplast RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Sep 12;16(17):8411–8431. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.17.8411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chory J. Out of darkness: mutants reveal pathways controlling light-regulated development in plants. Trends Genet. 1993 May;9(5):167–172. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90163-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Christopher D. A., Kim M., Mullet J. E. A novel light-regulated promoter is conserved in cereal and dicot chloroplasts. Plant Cell. 1992 Jul;4(7):785–798. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.7.785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Christopher D. A., Mullet J. E. Separate photosensory pathways co-regulate blue light/ultraviolet-A-activated psbD-psbC transcription and light-induced D2 and CP43 degradation in barley (Hordeum vulgare) chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr;104(4):1119–1129. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.4.1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deng X. W. Fresh view of light signal transduction in plants. Cell. 1994 Feb 11;76(3):423–426. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90107-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gruissem W., Elsner-Menzel C., Latshaw S., Narita J. O., Schaffer M. A., Zurawski G. A subpopulation of spinach chloroplast tRNA genes does not require upstream promoter elements for transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Oct 10;14(19):7541–7556. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.19.7541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haley J., Bogorad L. Alternative promoters are used for genes within maize chloroplast polycistronic transcription units. Plant Cell. 1990 Apr;2(4):323–333. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.4.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Iratni R., Baeza L., Andreeva A., Mache R., Lerbs-Mache S. Regulation of rDNA transcription in chloroplasts: promoter exclusion by constitutive repression. Genes Dev. 1994 Dec 1;8(23):2928–2938. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.23.2928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jolly S. O., Bogorad L. Preferential transcription of cloned maize chloroplast DNA sequences by maize chloroplast RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Feb;77(2):822–826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.2.822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim J., Eichacker L. A., Rudiger W., Mullet J. E. Chlorophyll regulates accumulation of the plastid-encoded chlorophyll proteins P700 and D1 by increasing apoprotein stability. Plant Physiol. 1994 Mar;104(3):907–916. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.3.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim M., Christopher D. A., Mullet J. E. Direct evidence for selective modulation of psbA, rpoA, rbcL and 16S RNA stability during barley chloroplast development. Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Jun;22(3):447–463. doi: 10.1007/BF00015975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Klein R. R., Mullet J. E. Light-induced transcription of chloroplast genes. psbA transcription is differentially enhanced in illuminated barley. J Biol Chem. 1990 Feb 5;265(4):1895–1902. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Klein R. R., Mullet J. E. Regulation of chloroplast-encoded chlorophyll-binding protein translation during higher plant chloroplast biogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1986 Aug 25;261(24):11138–11145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mathews D. E., Durbin R. D. Tagetitoxin inhibits RNA synthesis directed by RNA polymerases from chloroplasts and Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1990 Jan 5;265(1):493–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mullet J. E. Dynamic regulation of chloroplast transcription. Plant Physiol. 1993 Oct;103(2):309–313. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.2.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Narita J. O., Rushlow K. E., Hallick R. B. Characterization of a Euglena gracilis chloroplast RNA polymerase specific for ribosomal RNA genes. J Biol Chem. 1985 Sep 15;260(20):11194–11199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Neuhaus H., Scholz A., Link G. Structure and expression of a split chloroplast gene from mustard (Sinapis alba): ribosomal protein gene rps16 reveals unusual transcriptional features and complex RNA maturation. Curr Genet. 1989 Jan;15(1):63–70. doi: 10.1007/BF00445753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Orozco E. M., Jr, Mullet J. E., Chua N. H. An in vitro system for accurate transcription initiation of chloroplast protein genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Feb 25;13(4):1283–1302. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.4.1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Palmer J. D. Contrasting modes and tempos of genome evolution in land plant organelles. Trends Genet. 1990 Apr;6(4):115–120. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90125-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sun E., Wu B. W., Tewari K. K. In vitro analysis of the pea chloroplast 16S rRNA gene promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;9(12):5650–5659. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.12.5650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tiller K., Link G. Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation affect functional characteristics of chloroplast and etioplast transcription systems from mustard (Sinapis alba L.). EMBO J. 1993 May;12(5):1745–1753. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05822.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tiller K., Link G. Sigma-like transcription factors from mustard (Sinapis alba L.) etioplast are similar in size to, but functionally distinct from, their chloroplast counterparts. Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Feb;21(3):503–513. doi: 10.1007/BF00028807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wada T., Tunoyama Y., Shiina T., Toyoshima Y. In Vitro Analysis of Light-Induced Transcription in the Wheat psbD/C Gene Cluster Using Plastid Extracts from Dark-Grown and Short-Term-Illuminated Seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr;104(4):1259–1267. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.4.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES