Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1996 Aug;111(4):1313–1319. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.4.1313

Differential Expression of Two Endo-1,4-[beta]-Glucanase Genes in Pericarp and Locules of Wild-Type and Mutant Tomato Fruit.

C Gonzalez-Bosch 1, D A Brummell 1, A B Bennett 1
PMCID: PMC161016  PMID: 12226364

Abstract

The mRNA accumulation of two endo-1,4-[beta]-D-glucanase genes, Cel1 and Cel2, was examined in the pericarp and locules throughout the development of normal tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) fruit and the ripening-impaired mutants rin and Nr. Both Cel1 and Cel2 were expressed transiently at the earliest stages of fruit development during a period corresponding to cell division and early cell expansion. In the pericarp, the mRNA abundance of both genes increased markedly at the breaker stage; the level of Cel1 mRNA decreased later in ripening, and that of Cel2 increased progressively. Cel2 mRNA levels also increased at the breaker stage in locules but after initial locule liquefaction was already complete. In rin fruit mRNA abundance of Cel1 was reduced and Cel2 was virtually absent, whereas in Nr Cel1 was expressed at wild-type levels and Cel2 was reduced. In wild-type fruit ethylene treatment slightly promoted the mRNA accumulation of both genes. In rin fruit ethylene treatment strongly increased the mRNA abundance of Cel1 to an extent greater than in wild-type fruit, but Cel2 mRNA was absent even after ethylene treatment. These two endo-1,4-[beta]-D-glucanase genes, therefore, do not show coordinated expression during fruit development and are subject to distinct regulatory control. These results suggest that the product of the Cel2 gene contributes to ripening-associated cell-wall changes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carey A. T., Holt K., Picard S., Wilde R., Tucker G. A., Bird C. R., Schuch W., Seymour G. B. Tomato exo-(1-->4)-beta-D-galactanase. Isolation, changes during ripening in normal and mutant tomato fruit, and characterization of a related cDNA clone. Plant Physiol. 1995 Jul;108(3):1099–1107. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.3.1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang C., Kwok S. F., Bleecker A. B., Meyerowitz E. M. Arabidopsis ethylene-response gene ETR1: similarity of product to two-component regulators. Science. 1993 Oct 22;262(5133):539–544. doi: 10.1126/science.8211181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dellapenna D., Lincoln J. E., Fischer R. L., Bennett A. B. Transcriptional Analysis of Polygalacturonase and Other Ripening Associated Genes in Rutgers, rin, nor, and Nr Tomato Fruit. Plant Physiol. 1989 Aug;90(4):1372–1377. doi: 10.1104/pp.90.4.1372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gillaspy G., Ben-David H., Gruissem W. Fruits: A Developmental Perspective. Plant Cell. 1993 Oct;5(10):1439–1451. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.10.1439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Giovannoni J. J., DellaPenna D., Bennett A. B., Fischer R. L. Expression of a chimeric polygalacturonase gene in transgenic rin (ripening inhibitor) tomato fruit results in polyuronide degradation but not fruit softening. Plant Cell. 1989 Jan;1(1):53–63. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gross K. C., Wallner S. J. Degradation of Cell Wall Polysaccharides during Tomato Fruit Ripening. Plant Physiol. 1979 Jan;63(1):117–120. doi: 10.1104/pp.63.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hayashi T., Maclachlan G. Pea Xyloglucan and Cellulose : III. Metabolism during Lateral Expansion of Pea Epicotyl Cells. Plant Physiol. 1984 Nov;76(3):739–742. doi: 10.1104/pp.76.3.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lashbrook C. C., Gonzalez-Bosch C., Bennett A. B. Two divergent endo-beta-1,4-glucanase genes exhibit overlapping expression in ripening fruit and abscising flowers. Plant Cell. 1994 Oct;6(10):1485–1493. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.10.1485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lincoln J. E., Fischer R. L. Regulation of Gene Expression by Ethylene in Wild-Type and rin Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Fruit. Plant Physiol. 1988 Oct;88(2):370–374. doi: 10.1104/pp.88.2.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maclachlan G., Brady C. Endo-1,4-[beta]-Glucanase, Xyloglucanase, and Xyloglucan Endo-Transglycosylase Activities Versus Potential Substrates in Ripening Tomatoes. Plant Physiol. 1994 Jul;105(3):965–974. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.3.965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pressey R. beta-Galactosidases in Ripening Tomatoes. Plant Physiol. 1983 Jan;71(1):132–135. doi: 10.1104/pp.71.1.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sheehy R. E., Kramer M., Hiatt W. R. Reduction of polygalacturonase activity in tomato fruit by antisense RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):8805–8809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.8805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wallner S. J., Walker J. E. Glycosidases in Cell Wall-degrading Extracts of Ripening Tomato Fruits. Plant Physiol. 1975 Jan;55(1):94–98. doi: 10.1104/pp.55.1.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yen H. C., Lee S., Tanksley S. D., Lanahan M. B., Klee H. J., Giovannoni J. J. The tomato Never-ripe locus regulates ethylene-inducible gene expression and is linked to a homolog of the Arabidopsis ETR1 gene. Plant Physiol. 1995 Apr;107(4):1343–1353. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.4.1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES