Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1996 Jan;8(1):95–105. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.1.95

Genetic and biochemical dissection of transgenic RNA-mediated virus resistance.

J Goodwin 1, K Chapman 1, S Swaney 1, T D Parks 1, E A Wernsman 1, W G Dougherty 1
PMCID: PMC161084  PMID: 8597662

Abstract

RNA-mediated virus resistance has been observed in transgenic plants at varying frequencies, suggesting that a nuclear requirement or other pre-condition must be met. This study was undertaken to characterize genetically transgenes that confer a highly resistant state to infection by tobacco etch virus (TEV). Transgenic tobacco line 2RC-6.13, expressing an untranslatable mRNA containing the TEV coat protein open reading frame, had three distinct transgene integration events that segregated as two linkage groups. A genetic series of plants that contained zero, one, two, or all three transgene inserts in both homozygous and heterozygous conditions was produced and examined. Genetic and biochemical data suggested that RNA-mediated virus resistance is a multigenic trait in line 2RC-6.13; three or more transgenes were necessary to establish the highly resistant state. One or two transgene copies resulted in an inducible form of resistance (i.e., recovery). Transcription rates and steady state RNA levels of the transgene-derived transcript present in different members of the genetic series supported a post-transcriptional RNA degradation process as the underlying mechanism for transgene transcript reduction and virus resistance. This degradation process appeared to initiate via cleavage of specific sites within the target RNA sequence, as determined by RNA get blot and primer extension analyses of transgene-derived mRNA from various transgenic plant lines.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen G. C., Hall G. E., Jr, Childs L. C., Weissinger A. K., Spiker S., Thompson W. F. Scaffold attachment regions increase reporter gene expression in stably transformed plant cells. Plant Cell. 1993 Jun;5(6):603–613. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.6.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dougherty W. G., Lindbo J. A., Smith H. A., Parks T. D., Swaney S., Proebsting W. M. RNA-mediated virus resistance in transgenic plants: exploitation of a cellular pathway possibly involved in RNA degradation. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1994 Sep-Oct;7(5):544–552. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dougherty W. G., Parks T. D. Transgenes and gene suppression: telling us something new? Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;7(3):399–405. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flavell R. B. Inactivation of gene expression in plants as a consequence of specific sequence duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 26;91(9):3490–3496. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.3490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hart C. M., Fischer B., Neuhaus J. M., Meins F., Jr Regulated inactivation of homologous gene expression in transgenic Nicotiana sylvestris plants containing a defense-related tobacco chitinase gene. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Nov;235(2-3):179–188. doi: 10.1007/BF00279359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lindbo J. A., Dougherty W. G. Pathogen-derived resistance to a potyvirus: immune and resistant phenotypes in transgenic tobacco expressing altered forms of a potyvirus coat protein nucleotide sequence. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1992 Mar-Apr;5(2):144–153. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-5-144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lindbo J. A., Dougherty W. G. Untranslatable transcripts of the tobacco etch virus coat protein gene sequence can interfere with tobacco etch virus replication in transgenic plants and protoplasts. Virology. 1992 Aug;189(2):725–733. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90595-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lindbo J. A., Silva-Rosales L., Proebsting W. M., Dougherty W. G. Induction of a Highly Specific Antiviral State in Transgenic Plants: Implications for Regulation of Gene Expression and Virus Resistance. Plant Cell. 1993 Dec;5(12):1749–1759. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.12.1749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Matzke A. J., Neuhuber F., Park Y. D., Ambros P. F., Matzke M. A. Homology-dependent gene silencing in transgenic plants: epistatic silencing loci contain multiple copies of methylated transgenes. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Aug 2;244(3):219–229. doi: 10.1007/BF00285449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Matzke M. A., Matzke A. J. Differential inactivation and methylation of a transgene in plants by two suppressor loci containing homologous sequences. Plant Mol Biol. 1991 May;16(5):821–830. doi: 10.1007/BF00015074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Matzke M. A., Matzke A. J. Homology-dependent gene silencing in transgenic plants: what does it really tell us? Trends Genet. 1995 Jan;11(1):1–3. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)88973-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Matzke M. A., Primig M., Trnovsky J., Matzke A. J. Reversible methylation and inactivation of marker genes in sequentially transformed tobacco plants. EMBO J. 1989 Mar;8(3):643–649. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03421.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pang S. Z., Slightom J. L., Gonsalves D. Different mechanisms protect transgenic tobacco against tomato spotted wilt and impatiens necrotic spot Tospoviruses. Biotechnology (N Y) 1993 Jul;11(7):819–824. doi: 10.1038/nbt0793-819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith H. A., Swaney S. L., Parks T. D., Wernsman E. A., Dougherty W. G. Transgenic plant virus resistance mediated by untranslatable sense RNAs: expression, regulation, and fate of nonessential RNAs. Plant Cell. 1994 Oct;6(10):1441–1453. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.10.1441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Swaney S., Powers H., Goodwin J., Rosales L. S., Dougherty W. G. RNA-mediated resistance with nonstructural genes from the tobacco etch virus genome. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1995 Nov-Dec;8(6):1004–1011. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-8-1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Verwoerd T. C., Dekker B. M., Hoekema A. A small-scale procedure for the rapid isolation of plant RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Mar 25;17(6):2362–2362. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.6.2362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. de Carvalho Niebel F., Frendo P., Van Montagu M., Cornelissen M. Post-transcriptional cosuppression of beta-1,3-glucanase genes does not affect accumulation of transgene nuclear mRNA. Plant Cell. 1995 Mar;7(3):347–358. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.3.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Carvalho F., Gheysen G., Kushnir S., Van Montagu M., Inzé D., Castresana C. Suppression of beta-1,3-glucanase transgene expression in homozygous plants. EMBO J. 1992 Jul;11(7):2595–2602. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05324.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Haan P., Gielen J. J., Prins M., Wijkamp I. G., van Schepen A., Peters D., van Grinsven M. Q., Goldbach R. Characterization of RNA-mediated resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus in transgenic tobacco plants. Biotechnology (N Y) 1992 Oct;10(10):1133–1137. doi: 10.1038/nbt1092-1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES