Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1996 May;8(5):831–845. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.5.831

Functional domains of the floral regulator AGAMOUS: characterization of the DNA binding domain and analysis of dominant negative mutations.

Y Mizukami 1, H Huang 1, M Tudor 1, Y Hu 1, H Ma 1
PMCID: PMC161142  PMID: 8672883

Abstract

The Arabidopsis MADS box gene AGAMOUS (AG) controls reproductive organ identity and floral meristem determinacy. The AG protein binds in vitro to DNA sequences similar to the targets of known MADS domain transcription factors. Whereas most plant MADS domain proteins begin with the MADS domain, AG and its orthologs contain a region N-terminal to the MADS domain. All plant MADS domain proteins share another region with moderate sequence similarity called the K domain. Neither the region (I region) that lies between the MADS and K domains nor the C-terminal region is conserved. We show here that the AG MADS domain and the I region are necessary and sufficient for DNA binding in vitro and that AG binds to DNA as a dimer. To investigate the in vivo function of the regions of AG not required for in vitro DNA binding, we introduced several AG constructs into wild-type plants and characterized their floral phenotypes. We show that transgenic Arabidopsis plants with a 35S-AG construct encoding an AG protein lacking the N-terminal region produced apetala 2 (ap2)-like flowers similar to those ectopically expressing AG proteins retaining the N-terminal region. This result suggests that the N-terminal region is not required to produce the ap2-like phenotype. In addition, transformants with a 35S-AG construct encoding an AG protein lacking the C-terminal region produced ag-like flowers, indicating that this truncated AG protein inhibits normal AG function. Finally, transformants with a 35S-AG construct encoding an AG protein lacking both K and C regions produced flowers with more stamens and carpels. The phenotypes of the AG transformants demonstrate that both the K domain and the C-terminal region have important and distinct in vivo functions. We discuss possible mechanisms through which AG may regulate downstream genes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Angenent G. C., Franken J., Busscher M., Weiss D., van Tunen A. J. Co-suppression of the petunia homeotic gene fbp2 affects the identity of the generative meristem. Plant J. 1994 Jan;5(1):33–44. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1994.5010033.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowman J. L., Sakai H., Jack T., Weigel D., Mayer U., Meyerowitz E. M. SUPERMAN, a regulator of floral homeotic genes in Arabidopsis. Development. 1992 Mar;114(3):599–615. doi: 10.1242/dev.114.3.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowman J. L., Smyth D. R., Meyerowitz E. M. Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1989 Jan;1(1):37–52. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.1.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradley D., Carpenter R., Sommer H., Hartley N., Coen E. Complementary floral homeotic phenotypes result from opposite orientations of a transposon at the plena locus of Antirrhinum. Cell. 1993 Jan 15;72(1):85–95. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90052-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Church G. M., Gilbert W. Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(7):1991–1995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark S. E., Running M. P., Meyerowitz E. M. CLAVATA1, a regulator of meristem and flower development in Arabidopsis. Development. 1993 Oct;119(2):397–418. doi: 10.1242/dev.119.2.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coen E. S., Carpenter R. The Metamorphosis of Flowers. Plant Cell. 1993 Oct;5(10):1175–1181. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.10.1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Drews G. N., Bowman J. L., Meyerowitz E. M. Negative regulation of the Arabidopsis homeotic gene AGAMOUS by the APETALA2 product. Cell. 1991 Jun 14;65(6):991–1002. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90551-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gaiser J. C., Robinson-Beers K., Gasser C. S. The Arabidopsis SUPERMAN Gene Mediates Asymmetric Growth of the Outer Integument of Ovules. Plant Cell. 1995 Mar;7(3):333–345. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.3.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goff S. A., Cone K. C., Fromm M. E. Identification of functional domains in the maize transcriptional activator C1: comparison of wild-type and dominant inhibitor proteins. Genes Dev. 1991 Feb;5(2):298–309. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.2.298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Herskowitz I. Functional inactivation of genes by dominant negative mutations. Nature. 1987 Sep 17;329(6136):219–222. doi: 10.1038/329219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang H., Tudor M., Su T., Zhang Y., Hu Y., Ma H. DNA binding properties of two Arabidopsis MADS domain proteins: binding consensus and dimer formation. Plant Cell. 1996 Jan;8(1):81–94. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jack T., Brockman L. L., Meyerowitz E. M. The homeotic gene APETALA3 of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a MADS box and is expressed in petals and stamens. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):683–697. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90144-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kempin S. A., Mandel M. A., Yanofsky M. F. Conversion of perianth into reproductive organs by ectopic expression of the tobacco floral homeotic gene NAG1. Plant Physiol. 1993 Dec;103(4):1041–1046. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.4.1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kempin S. A., Savidge B., Yanofsky M. F. Molecular basis of the cauliflower phenotype in Arabidopsis. Science. 1995 Jan 27;267(5197):522–525. doi: 10.1126/science.7824951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kunst L., Klenz J. E., Martinez-Zapater J., Haughn G. W. AP2 Gene Determines the Identity of Perianth Organs in Flowers of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 1989 Dec;1(12):1195–1208. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.12.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ma H. The unfolding drama of flower development: recent results from genetic and molecular analyses. Genes Dev. 1994 Apr 1;8(7):745–756. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.7.745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ma H., Yanofsky M. F., Meyerowitz E. M. AGL1-AGL6, an Arabidopsis gene family with similarity to floral homeotic and transcription factor genes. Genes Dev. 1991 Mar;5(3):484–495. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.3.484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mandel M. A., Bowman J. L., Kempin S. A., Ma H., Meyerowitz E. M., Yanofsky M. F. Manipulation of flower structure in transgenic tobacco. Cell. 1992 Oct 2;71(1):133–143. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90272-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mandel M. A., Gustafson-Brown C., Savidge B., Yanofsky M. F. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature. 1992 Nov 19;360(6401):273–277. doi: 10.1038/360273a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mizukami Y., Ma H. Ectopic expression of the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS in transgenic Arabidopsis plants alters floral organ identity. Cell. 1992 Oct 2;71(1):119–131. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90271-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mizukami Y., Ma H. Separation of AG function in floral meristem determinacy from that in reproductive organ identity by expressing antisense AG RNA. Plant Mol Biol. 1995 Aug;28(5):767–784. doi: 10.1007/BF00042064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mueller C. G., Nordheim A. A protein domain conserved between yeast MCM1 and human SRF directs ternary complex formation. EMBO J. 1991 Dec;10(13):4219–4229. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb05000.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nairn C. J., Winesett L., Ferl R. J. Nucleotide sequence of an actin gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene. 1988 May 30;65(2):247–257. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90461-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Norman C., Runswick M., Pollock R., Treisman R. Isolation and properties of cDNA clones encoding SRF, a transcription factor that binds to the c-fos serum response element. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):989–1003. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90244-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nurrish S. J., Treisman R. DNA binding specificity determinants in MADS-box transcription factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Aug;15(8):4076–4085. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.8.4076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Odell J. T., Nagy F., Chua N. H. Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. 1985 Feb 28-Mar 6Nature. 313(6005):810–812. doi: 10.1038/313810a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Passmore S., Elble R., Tye B. K. A protein involved in minichromosome maintenance in yeast binds a transcriptional enhancer conserved in eukaryotes. Genes Dev. 1989 Jul;3(7):921–935. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.7.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Passmore S., Maine G. T., Elble R., Christ C., Tye B. K. Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein involved in plasmid maintenance is necessary for mating of MAT alpha cells. J Mol Biol. 1988 Dec 5;204(3):593–606. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90358-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Paz-Ares J., Ghosal D., Saedler H. Molecular analysis of the C1-I allele from Zea mays: a dominant mutant of the regulatory C1 locus. EMBO J. 1990 Feb;9(2):315–321. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08113.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Paz-Ares J., Ghosal D., Wienand U., Peterson P. A., Saedler H. The regulatory c1 locus of Zea mays encodes a protein with homology to myb proto-oncogene products and with structural similarities to transcriptional activators. EMBO J. 1987 Dec 1;6(12):3553–3558. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02684.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pellegrini L., Tan S., Richmond T. J. Structure of serum response factor core bound to DNA. Nature. 1995 Aug 10;376(6540):490–498. doi: 10.1038/376490a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Primig M., Winkler H., Ammerer G. The DNA binding and oligomerization domain of MCM1 is sufficient for its interaction with other regulatory proteins. EMBO J. 1991 Dec;10(13):4209–4218. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04999.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Purugganan M. D., Rounsley S. D., Schmidt R. J., Yanofsky M. F. Molecular evolution of flower development: diversification of the plant MADS-box regulatory gene family. Genetics. 1995 May;140(1):345–356. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.1.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schmidt R. J., Veit B., Mandel M. A., Mena M., Hake S., Yanofsky M. F. Identification and molecular characterization of ZAG1, the maize homolog of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS. Plant Cell. 1993 Jul;5(7):729–737. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.7.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schultz E. A., Pickett F. B., Haughn G. W. The FLO10 Gene Product Regulates the Expression Domain of Homeotic Genes AP3 and PI in Arabidopsis Flowers. Plant Cell. 1991 Nov;3(11):1221–1237. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.11.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwarz-Sommer Z., Hue I., Huijser P., Flor P. J., Hansen R., Tetens F., Lönnig W. E., Saedler H., Sommer H. Characterization of the Antirrhinum floral homeotic MADS-box gene deficiens: evidence for DNA binding and autoregulation of its persistent expression throughout flower development. EMBO J. 1992 Jan;11(1):251–263. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05048.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schwarz-Sommer Z., Huijser P., Nacken W., Saedler H., Sommer H. Genetic Control of Flower Development by Homeotic Genes in Antirrhinum majus. Science. 1990 Nov 16;250(4983):931–936. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4983.931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sharrocks A. D., von Hesler F., Shaw P. E. The identification of elements determining the different DNA binding specificities of the MADS box proteins p67SRF and RSRFC4. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Jan 25;21(2):215–221. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.2.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shiraishi H., Okada K., Shimura Y. Nucleotide sequences recognized by the AGAMOUS MADS domain of Arabidopsis thaliana in vitro. Plant J. 1993 Aug;4(2):385–398. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04020385.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sieburth L. E., Running M. P., Meyerowitz E. M. Genetic separation of third and fourth whorl functions of AGAMOUS. Plant Cell. 1995 Aug;7(8):1249–1258. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.8.1249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smyth D. R., Bowman J. L., Meyerowitz E. M. Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1990 Aug;2(8):755–767. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.8.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Studier F. W., Rosenberg A. H., Dunn J. J., Dubendorff J. W. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 1990;185:60–89. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)85008-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tan S., Richmond T. J. DNA binding-induced conformational change of the yeast transcriptional activator PRTF. Cell. 1990 Jul 27;62(2):367–377. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90373-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Valvekens D., Van Montagu M., Van Lijsebettens M. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana root explants by using kanamycin selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(15):5536–5540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.15.5536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Weigel D., Meyerowitz E. M. The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell. 1994 Jul 29;78(2):203–209. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90291-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yanofsky M. F., Ma H., Bowman J. L., Drews G. N., Feldmann K. A., Meyerowitz E. M. The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors. Nature. 1990 Jul 5;346(6279):35–39. doi: 10.1038/346035a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES