Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1994 Jan;84(1):43–49. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.1.43

Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference?

C S Skinner 1, V J Strecher 1, H Hospers 1
PMCID: PMC1614921  PMID: 8279610

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. Message tailoring, based on individual needs and circumstances, is commonly used to enhance face-to-face patient counseling. Only recently has individual tailoring become feasible for printed messages. This study sought to determine whether printed tailored recommendations addressing women's specific screening and risk status and perceptions about breast cancer and mammography are more effective than standardized printed recommendations. METHODS. Computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted with 435 women, aged 40 to 65 years, who had visited family practice groups within the previous 2 years. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive individually tailored or standardized mammography recommendation letters mailed from physicians to patients' homes. Follow-up interviews were conducted 8 months later. RESULTS. Tailored letter recipients were more likely to remember and to have read more of their letters than standardized version recipients. After controlling for baseline status, tailored letter receipt was associated with more favorable follow-up mammography status for women with incomes below $26,000 and for Black women. CONCLUSIONS. Tailored messages are a more effective medium for physicians' mammography recommendations; tailoring may be especially important for women of low socioeconomic status.

Full text

PDF
43

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burack R. C., Liang J. The acceptance and completion of mammography by older black women. Am J Public Health. 1989 Jun;79(6):721–726. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.6.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Calnan M. W., Moss S., Chamberlain J. Explaining attendance at a breast-screening clinic. Patient Educ Couns. 1985 Mar;7(1):87–96. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(85)90022-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coll P. P., O'Connor P. J., Crabtree B. F., Besdine R. W. Effects of age, education, and physician advice on utilization of screening mammography. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989 Oct;37(10):957–962. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb07281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Collette H. J., Day N. E., Rombach J. J., de Waard F. Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet. 1984 Jun 2;1(8388):1224–1226. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91704-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DiClemente C. C., Hughes S. O. Stages of change profiles in outpatient alcoholism treatment. J Subst Abuse. 1990;2(2):217–235. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(05)80057-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kruse J., Phillips D. M. Factors influencing women's decision to undergo mammography. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Nov;70(5):744–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lane D. S., Fine H. L. Compliance with mammography referrals. Implications for breast cancer screening. N Y State J Med. 1983 Feb;83(2):173–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lerman C., Rimer B., Trock B., Balshem A., Engstrom P. F. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med. 1990 May;19(3):279–290. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(90)90028-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maclean U., Sinfield D., Klein S., Harnden B. Women who decline breast screening. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1984 Dec;38(4):278–283. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.4.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morrison A. S., Brisson J., Khalid N. Breast cancer incidence and mortality in the breast cancer detection demonstration project [published errtum appears in J Natl Cancer Inst 1989 Oct 4;81(19):1513]. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Dec 7;80(19):1540–1547. doi: 10.1093/jnci/80.19.1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Connell D., Velicer W. F. A decisional balance measure and the stages of change model for weight loss. Int J Addict. 1988 Jul;23(7):729–750. doi: 10.3109/10826088809058836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Palli D., Del Turco M. R., Buiatti E., Carli S., Ciatto S., Toscani L., Maltoni G. A case-control study of the efficacy of a non-randomized breast cancer screening program in Florence (Italy). Int J Cancer. 1986 Oct 15;38(4):501–504. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910380408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peeters P. H., Verbeek A. L., Hendriks J. H., Holland R., Mravunac M. The predictive value of positive test results in screening for breast cancer by mammography in the Nijmegen programme. Br J Cancer. 1987 Nov;56(5):667–671. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Prochaska J. O., DiClemente C. C. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390–395. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Prochaska J. O., Goldstein M. G. Process of smoking cessation. Implications for clinicians. Clin Chest Med. 1991 Dec;12(4):727–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Prochaska J. O., Velicer W. F., DiClemente C. C., Fava J. Measuring processes of change: applications to the cessation of smoking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Aug;56(4):520–528. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.4.520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rakowski W., Dube C. E., Marcus B. H., Prochaska J. O., Velicer W. F., Abrams D. B. Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography. Health Psychol. 1992;11(2):111–118. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.11.2.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rutledge D. N., Hartmann W. H., Kinman P. O., Winfield A. C. Exploration of factors affecting mammography behaviors. Prev Med. 1988 Jul;17(4):412–422. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(88)90040-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Seidman H., Gelb S. K., Silverberg E., LaVerda N., Lubera J. A. Survival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. CA Cancer J Clin. 1987 Sep-Oct;37(5):258–290. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.37.5.258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shapiro S. Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial. Cancer. 1977 Jun;39(6 Suppl):2772–2782. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197706)39:6<2772::aid-cncr2820390665>3.0.co;2-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shapiro S., Venet W., Strax P., Venet L., Roeser R. Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982 Aug;69(2):349–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith R. A., Haynes S. Barriers to screening for breast cancer. Cancer. 1992 Apr 1;69(7 Suppl):1968–1978. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920401)69:7+<1968::aid-cncr2820691718>3.0.co;2-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tabár L., Faberberg G., Day N. E., Holmberg L. What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. Br J Cancer. 1987 May;55(5):547–551. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tabár L., Fagerberg C. J., Gad A., Baldetorp L., Holmberg L. H., Gröntoft O., Ljungquist U., Lundström B., Månson J. C., Eklund G. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet. 1985 Apr 13;1(8433):829–832. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92204-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tippy P., Falvo D. R., Woehlke P. Fee structure as a determinant of patient's choice to undergo mammography. Fam Pract Res J. 1989 Fall-Winter;9(1):43–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Verbeek A. L., Hendriks J. H., Holland R., Mravunac M., Sturmans F., Day N. E. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981. Lancet. 1984 Jun 2;1(8388):1222–1224. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91703-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wolosin R. J. The experience of screening mammography. J Fam Pract. 1989 Nov;29(5):499–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zapka J. G., Stoddard A. M., Costanza M. E., Greene H. L. Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors. Am J Public Health. 1989 Nov;79(11):1499–1502. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.11.1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES