Abstract
OBJECTIVES. The hypothesis was tested that unfavorable social conditions are associated with poor perinatal survival through direct effects on pregnancy or, more indirectly, through effects on mothers born under such conditions. The occupation of Norway by Nazi Germany was used as a period of social hardship. METHODS. Data from Norwegian vital statistics and the Medical Birth Registry were used to describe perinatal mortality during World War II and also a generation later, among babies born to mothers who had themselves been born during the war. Logistic regression was used to identify a possible cohort effect among mothers born in 1940 through 1944 compared with mothers born before or after that period. RESULTS. Harsh conditions in Norway during the occupation increased childhood mortality. However, perinatal mortality declined during that period. Likewise, no adverse effect was seen on the survival of babies born to mothers who had themselves been born during the war (odds ratio = 1.00; 95% confidence interval = 0.96, 1.04). CONCLUSIONS. We find no evidence that wartime conditions in Norway impaired perinatal survival, either directly or through an effect on women born during the war. These data underscore how little is known about the ways that social conditions influence perinatal mortality.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bjelke E. Variation in height and weight in the Norwegian population. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1971 Nov;25(4):192–202. doi: 10.1136/jech.25.4.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brundtland G. H., Liestøl K., Walløe L. Height, weight and menarcheal age of Oslo schoolchildren during the last 60 years. Ann Hum Biol. 1980 Jul-Aug;7(4):307–322. doi: 10.1080/03014468000004381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CASE R. A. Cohort analysis of mortality rates as an historical or narrative technique. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1956 Oct;10(4):159–171. doi: 10.1136/jech.10.4.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clayton D., Schifflers E. Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. I: Age-period and age-cohort models. Stat Med. 1987 Jun;6(4):449–467. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emanuel I., Filakti H., Alberman E., Evans S. J. Intergenerational studies of human birthweight from the 1958 birth cohort. 1. Evidence for a multigenerational effect. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Jan;99(1):67–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14396.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emanuel I., Hale C. B., Berg C. J. Poor birth outcomes of American black women: an alternative explanation. J Public Health Policy. 1989 Autumn;10(3):299–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holford T. R. Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:425–457. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.002233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCance R. A., Widdowson E. M. The determinants of growth and form. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1974 Jan 22;185(1078):1–17. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1974.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skjaerven R., Wilcox A. J., Lie R. T., Irgens L. M. Selective fertility and the distortion of perinatal mortality. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Dec;128(6):1352–1363. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilcox A. J. Infant mortality revisited. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;7(4):347–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1993.tb00413.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yankauer A. Infant mortality and morbidity in the International Year of the Child. Am J Public Health. 1979 Sep;69(9):852–854. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]