Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of anonymous testing availability on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test demand in Arizona. Testing patterns before and after the introduction of anonymous testing were compared. Client knowledge of new test policy and delay in testing until an anonymous option was available were assessed. Test numbers among men who have sex with men showed a statistically significant increase after introduction of an anonymous testing option. Arizona continues to maintain anonymous testing availability. Public health agencies should consider how test policy may influence people's HIV test decisions.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Fehrs L. J., Fleming D., Foster L. R., McAlister R. O., Fox V., Modesitt S., Conrad R. Trial of anonymous versus confidential human immunodeficiency virus testing. Lancet. 1988 Aug 13;2(8607):379–382. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92846-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Francis D. P., Singleton J. A. Reporting of HIV-1 infection through the provision of essential services. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1993 Mar;6(3):285–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirano D., England B., Hoff C., Helmstadter L., Boyd D., Fickes M., Doyle B., Kohrs J. Reporting HIV infections. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1994 Apr;7(4):417–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kegeles S. M., Coates T. J., Lo B., Catania J. A. Mandatory reporting of HIV testing would deter men from being tested. JAMA. 1989 Mar 3;261(9):1275–1276. doi: 10.1001/jama.1989.03420090039012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]