Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1995 Sep;85(9):1218–1222. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.9.1218

Reducing cigarette consumption in California: tobacco taxes vs an anti-smoking media campaign.

T W Hu 1, H Y Sung 1, T E Keeler 1
PMCID: PMC1615589  PMID: 7661228

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the relative effects of taxation vs an anti-smoking media campaign on cigarette consumption in California. METHODS: Quarterly cigarette sales data reported by the California State Board of Equalization between 1980 and 1992 were used to estimate a time-series model, adjusted for seasonal variations and time trends. RESULTS: The estimated results show that sales of cigarettes were reduced by 819 million packs from the third quarter of 1990 through the fourth quarter of 1992 owing to an additional 25-cent state tax increase, while the anti-smoking media campaign reduced the cigarette sales by 232 million packs during the same period. CONCLUSIONS: Both taxation and anti-smoking media campaigns are effective means of reducing cigarette consumption. The strength of those effects, however, is influenced by the magnitude of the taxes and the amount of media campaign expenditures.

Full text

PDF
1218

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bal D. G., Kizer K. W., Felten P. G., Mozar H. N., Niemeyer D. Reducing tobacco consumption in California. Development of a statewide anti-tobacco use campaign. JAMA. 1990 Sep 26;264(12):1570–1574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hu T. W., Bai J., Keeler T. E., Barnett P. G., Sung H. Y. The impact of California Proposition 99, a major anti-smoking law, on cigarette consumption. J Public Health Policy. 1994 Spring;15(1):26–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Keeler T. E., Hu T. W., Barnett P. G., Manning W. G. Taxation, regulation, and addiction: a demand function for cigarettes based on time-series evidence. J Health Econ. 1993 Apr;12(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90037-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Skolnick A. A. Court orders California governor to restore antismoking media campaign funding. JAMA. 1992 May 27;267(20):2721–2723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wasserman J., Manning W. G., Newhouse J. P., Winkler J. D. The effects of excise taxes and regulations on cigarette smoking. J Health Econ. 1991 May;10(1):43–64. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90016-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES