Abstract
The mechanism of decomposition of peroxynitrite (OONO−) in aqueous sodium phosphate buffer solution at neutral pH was investigated. The OONO− was synthesized by directly reacting nitric oxide with superoxide anion at pH 13. The hypothesis was explored that OONO−, after protonation at pH 7.0 to HOONO, decomposes into 1O2 and HNO according to a spin-conserved unimolecular mechanism. Small aliquots of the concentrated alkaline OONO− solution were added to a buffer solution (final pH 7.0–7.2), and the formation of 1O2 and NO− in high yields was observed. The 1O2 generated was trapped as the transannular peroxide (DPAO2) of 9,10-diphenylanthracene (DPA) dissolved in carbon tetrachloride. The nitroxyl anion (NO−) formed from HNO (pKa 4.5) was trapped as nitrosylhemoglobin (HbNO) in an aqueous methemoglobin (MetHb) solution. In the presence of 25 mM sodium bicarbonate, which is known to accelerate the rate of decomposition of OONO−, the amount of singlet oxygen trapped was reduced by a factor of ≈2 whereas the yield of trapping of NO− by methemoglobin remained unaffected. Because NO3− is known to be the ultimate decomposition product of OONO−, these results suggest that the nitrate anion is not formed by a direct isomerization of OONO−, but by an indirect route originating from NO−.
Keywords: nitrosylhemoglobin, diphenylanthracene endoperoxide
Peroxynitrite is a potent oxidant formed by the near diffusion-controlled reaction of nitric oxide (NO⋅) and superoxide ion (O2−) (1). Both nitric oxide and superoxide are produced by activated macrophages (2, 3), neutrophils (4), and endothelial cells (5, 6). There is evidence that peroxynitrite is formed in significant concentrations in vivo (7–9) and may contribute to an increased risk for cancer (10), artherosclerosis (11), stroke (12), and other diseases (13). Peroxynitrite is a stable anion in alkaline solution (pKa of 6.8); however, once protonated, it decomposes rapidly with a half-life of less than 1 s at physiological pH at 37°C (14), generating reactive species that readily react with biomolecules such as lipids (15), amino acids (16), and DNA (17). Central to the question of the biochemistry of peroxynitrite is the mechanism of decomposition and the identity of the reactive species, a subject of intense research and controversy (18–21). Speculations about the decomposition mechanisms are largely based on kinetic and thermodynamic considerations (22). It has been shown that bicarbonate ion enhances the rate of disappearance of peroxynitrite, leading to the proposal of a nitrosoperoxycarbonate anion adduct, with a distinctly different chemistry from that of OONO− (19).
We reported previously that the mere acidification of an aqueous peroxynitrite solution resulted in chemiluminescence at 1,270 nm characteristic of the deactivation of singlet oxygen (23). By comparing the intensity of this emission to that of 1O2 generated by the reaction of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) with hypochlorite anion (OCl−), which is known to be stoichiometric (24), it was concluded that the yield of 1O2 from peroxynitrite was nearly stoichiometric. These results suggested a spin-conserved process leading to the generation of 1O2 from peroxynitrite. However, the highly exothermic neutralization reaction of the acidic with the basic reactant and the local non-equilibrium conditions made extrapolating this interpretation to biological conditions at pH 7 uncertain. We decided to examine the nature of the reactive species generated in the decomposition of peroxynitrite under more controlled and physiologically relevant conditions.
In this communication we report an important reaction pathway for the decomposition of peroxynitrite that yields two transient species, nitroxyl anion (NO−) and singlet molecular oxygen. By using well established analytical procedures, an aqueous alkaline solution (pH ≈13) of peroxynitrite was allowed to react in separate but parallel experiments with two chemical traps, one specific for singlet oxygen and one specific for the nitroxyl anion, NO−. Singlet oxygen was trapped as the transannular peroxide (DPAO2) of 9,10-diphenylanthracene (DPA) (25–27), and the nitroxyl anion was trapped as nitrosylhemoglobin (HbNO) in aqueous solutions of methemoglobin (MetHb) (28), both with very high yields. The effects of bicarbonate ions on the yields of NO− and 1O2 in aqueous solution were investigated.
Methods
Chemicals.
Bovine MetHb (Sigma) was crystallized, dialyzed, and lyophilized. DPA (97%), perylene (99%), 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene [tetramethylethylene (TME)] (98%), acetone (spectral grade), potassium superoxide (KO2), and potassium hydroxide (KOH) were obtained from Aldrich. Angeli's salt (Na2N2O3) was obtained from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI). Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (30% aqueous solution) (Certified ACS), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) (4–6% available chlorine, purified grade), and acetone were from Fisher. Carbon tetrachloride (Reagent ACS) was obtained from Spectrum Chemical (Gardnia, CA), and nitric oxide (NO) gas was from Matheson Gas (East Rutherford, NJ).
Peroxynitrite.
Peroxynitrite was generated as described (23) by bubbling NO gas into a deoxygenated 1 M KOH solution at 0°C, and then adding KO2 powder (≈5 mg), in small amounts, until a bright yellow solution was obtained. The pH of the solution was ≈13, and the concentration of peroxynitrite was in the range of 70–110 mM based on the absorbance at 302 nm (ɛ = 1,670 M−1⋅cm−1) (29).
Reagent Solutions.
A concentrated solution of MetHb was made in 1 ml of deoxygenated 70 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and was further purified by passing through a Sephadex G-25 column (Pharmacia) using 70 mM phosphate buffer as the elutant. The eluted solution was then diluted with additional 70 mM phosphate buffer to bring the concentration to around 60–85 μM. The concentration was determined by absorbance at 406 nm (ɛ406 = 154 mM−1⋅cm−1) (30). Solutions of Na2N2O3 (80 mM) in 10 mM NaOH were prepared just before use and were stored on ice. Solutions of KNO2 (100 mM) were prepared in 70 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Solutions of NaHCO3 were prepared by adding premeasured amounts of solid sodium bicarbonate, to give a final concentration of 25 mM (31), to individual polypropylene centrifuge tubes, to which were added 2-ml aliquots of the MetHb solutions in 70 mM phosphate buffer.
NO− Trapping by MetHb Under N2.
Experimental procedures were as follows: First, aliquots were taken from an individual sample of the 2 ml of buffered 80 μM MetHb solution (with or without sodium bicarbonate), absorption spectra were taken with either a 1-mm path length cuvette for the 400-nm Soret region or 1-cm for the visible region. Next, the solutions were transferred back to the centrifuge tube. To this MetHb solution was then added one aliquot (from 1 to 10 μl) of either peroxynitrite or KNO2 solution, or KOH solution, immediately before the absorption spectrum was recorded. The absorption spectrum of the MetHb/Na2N2O3 solution was recorded 10 min after addition, resulting in the HbNO reference spectrum (without bicarbonate). Absorption measurements were made by using a Hewlett Packard 8453 UV-VIS diode array spectrophotometer. After the absorption measurements, the pH of each of the solutions was measured with a pH meter (Horizon Ecology, Chicago).
Trapping of 1O2.
In a typical biphasic experiment, 0.50 ml CCl4 solutions containing either 80 mM DPA and 0.8 mM perylene (solution A), or 80 mM DPA, 0.8 mM perylene, and 80 mM TME (solution B), were pipetted into 15-ml propylene centrifuge tubes; 100-μl aliquots of 75 mM OONO− solution (pH 13) were then pipetted on top of the CCl4 layer, and the two layers were mixed thoroughly by vortexing. While continuing the vortexing, a total of 5 ml of 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7) (with or without bicarbonate) were added drop-wise to this emulsified CCl4 solution to initiate the decomposition of peroxynitrite. After separation of the layers, the aqueous layer was discarded, and the procedure was repeated, using 100-μl aliquots of the OONO− solution, until the 2-ml aliquot of the peroxynitrite solution was used up. The CCl4 layer was then washed twice with 10 ml of distilled water. The CCl4 solution was then evaporated to dryness under vacuum. The residue was dissolved in 2 ml of acetone, and 50-μl aliquots were analyzed by HPLC techniques. The HPLC system consisted of a Waters Model 510 solvent delivery system with an SPD-10A UV-Vis detector (Shimadzu) employing a 250- × 10-mm C18 Hypersil 5 column (Phenomenex, Belmont, CA), and a linear gradient 30–100% (60 min) of acetonitrile in water (flow rate 2 ml/min, UV detection of products at 210 nm).
Estimation of Singlet Oxygen Yields from Peroxynitrite Decomposition.
The amount of 1O2 generated from the decomposition of OONO− was estimated by comparing the yield of formation of the endoperoxide DPAO2 (25) to the yield of DPAO2 resulting from 1O2 generated by the extensively studied reaction of H2O2 with NaOCl under comparable conditions. Both H2O2 (30%, 12.5 M) and NaOCl (≈0.7 mM) were diluted with 1 M KOH solution to ≈75 mM (which is equivalent to the peroxynitrite concentration of 75 mM used in parallel experiments). A total of 2 ml of 75 mM H2O2 was reacted with a total of 2 ml of 75 mM NaOCl in the presence of 0.5 ml CCl4 solutions A or B. As in the case of the peroxynitrite experiments above, the reactions were carried out stepwise in small batches of 200 μl of 75 mM H2O2 and 0.5 ml CCl4 solution, as described above for the OONO− decomposition reactions.
Results
Trapping of NO− from Peroxynitrite by MetHb.
Nitroxyl anion (NO−) was trapped by MetHb [Fe(III) state] to produce HbNO [Fe(II) state] under N2. The conversion of MetHb to HbNO results in the appearance of two new absorption bands at 540 and 572 nm (28). The identification of HbNO generated in the decomposition of peroxynitrite was based on the comparison of these two bands with those obtained from the reaction of MetHb with Angeli's salt (Na2N2O3). Angeli's salt, under neutral or mildly alkaline conditions, decomposes via its monoanion, HN2O3−, to quantitatively generate NO−, and is known to efficiently convert MetHb to HbNO as the sole heme product (28).
The MetHb absorption spectra generally depend on the pH of the solution. Therefore, our experiments were performed in a limited pH range of 7.0 to 7.2 (28). In this pH range, the effect of pH on the absorption spectra, particularly in the wavelength region of interest from 535 to 635 nm, is small (Fig. 1, trace a, pH 7.0; trace b, pH 7.2).
In the synthesis of peroxynitrite, nitrate (NO3−) and nitrite (NO2−) anions are also produced. Of these, NO3− does not interfere in the nitroxyl trapping by MetHb (results not shown); NO2−, on the other hand, is known to bind to MetHb (32) and could, potentially, interfere in these experiments. However, the absorption spectrum of MetHb in the presence of 100 mM KNO2 (Fig. 1, trace c) shows that the NO2− ions have a negligible effect on the absorption spectrum of MetHb as compared with the effect of OONO− (Fig. 1, trace d).
The spectra of MetHb (80 μM) in the presence of OONO− (220 μM) and NO− generated from the decomposition of Angeli's salt (160 μM) are compared in Fig. 1 (traces d and e). In both cases, new bands or shoulders are apparent at 540 and 572 nm that are characteristic of HbNO. These changes in absorbance were complete within the 8- to 10-s manual mixing time.
Peroxynitrite Titration of MetHb in the Presence and Absence of HCO3−.
Titration of 80 μM MetHb with aliquots of a 100 mM peroxynitrite solution (under 1 atm N2), thus generating HbNO, was undertaken to determine the binding characteristics of NO− to MetHb in the absence and the presence of 25 mM sodium bicarbonate in 70 mM sodium phosphate buffer solutions. The concentration of HbNO was monitored by following the absorbance at 572 nm (Fig. 2, closed circles). Saturation of the MetHb binding sites occurs approximately near a 100 μM OONO− concentration, which is close to a 1:1 MetHb:OONO− concentration ratio. This is consistent with a dissociation of OONO− to NO−, and a near-stoichiometric binding of the latter to MetHb to form the observed HbNO complex. The half-life of the HbNO complex is known to be of the order of hours in the absence of oxygen (32), and therefore its dissociation can be neglected under the conditions of the experiments depicted in Fig. 2. Interestingly, the effect of 25 mM bicarbonate (Fig. 2, open circles) on the extent of HbNO formation is negligible. This observation suggests that bicarbonate ions do not significantly influence the formation of NO− from OONO− under the conditions of our experiments (see below).
Trapping of 1O2 from Peroxynitrite by Diphenylanthracene.
Using an extension of a procedure developed earlier (27), we have identified and quantitated the amount of 1O2 generated in the decomposition of peroxynitrite in the biphasic reaction system described above. In brief, 1O2 reacts rapidly and specifically with DPA (kr = 1.3 × 106 M−1⋅s−1) (33) to produce DPA endoperoxide (DPAO2); DPAO2 is stable at room temperature (27). Perylene is used here as an internal standard in the HPLC experiments to provide a means for quantitating the amount of DPAO2 formed (perylene reacts ≈100 times more slowly with 1O2 than DPA) (34). TME reacts with 1O2 to generate a stable hydroperoxide [(kr = 29.7 × 106 M−1⋅s−1) (33)] and is used here as a competitive inhibitor of DPA peroxidation.
When peroxynitrite (2 ml of a 75 mM OONO− solution) is allowed to decompose stepwise at pH 7 in the basic aqueous buffer/CCl4 system (solution A), the HPLC elution profile shown in Fig. 3A is obtained. This profile shows a prominent peak due to unreacted DPA and a smaller peak due to the DPAO2 endoperoxide product; the area under this trace is ≈30% relative to the area of the perylene standard. In contrast, the DPAO2 fraction is missing entirely when the decomposition of OONO− takes place in the presence of 78 mM tetramethylethylene, an efficient trap of singlet oxygen (Fig. 3B).
The yield of 1O2 from the H2O2/OCl− reaction in aqueous buffer solution occurs with ≈100% efficiency as reported by Held et al. (24). We therefore compared the yields of 1O2, as measured by the appearance of DPAO2, from the OONO− decomposition and the H2O2/OCl− using the same concentrations of reactants in both cases. The HPLC elution profile derived from a positive control experiment in which 1O2 is generated by the well characterized H2O2/OCl− reaction that generates 1O2 is shown in Fig. 3C. As expected, a fraction attributed to DPAO2 is apparent (≈25% of the perylene integrated peak area). Fig. 3D shows an elution profile of a fraction derived from another H2O2/OCl− reaction identical to the one shown in C, except that the 1O2 scavenger TME (78 mM) was also present; as expected, the DPAO2 fraction is missing in D. The normalized yields of 1O2, as measured by the DPAO2/perylene ratios, are comparable to one another in these two experiments, suggesting a high efficiency of formation of 1O2 from OONO−.
Yield of 1O2 from OONO− in the Presence of 25 mM Sodium Bicarbonate.
The effect of sodium bicarbonate on the 1O2 yield from the OONO− decomposition and the H2O2/OCl− reactions, as measured by the DPAO2/perylene, are compared in the HPLC elution profiles shown in Fig. 4 A and B. In Fig. 4B, depicting a typical result of a OONO− decomposition reaction in the presence of 25 mM sodium bicarbonate, the integrated area under the DPAO2 elution trace is 15% of the area under the perylene standard elution trace whereas in the absence of bicarbonate this area is 30% (A). In Fig. 4C, in the H2O2/OCl− reaction under analogous condition, this ratio is also 30%. Thus, in the H2O2/OCl− reaction, the sodium bicarbonate seems to have no effect on the 1O2 yield whereas this yield is decreased by ≈50% in the case of the OONO− decomposition to 1O2 and NO−; this result is consistent with the near-stoichiometric yield of nitrosylhemoglobin observed spectrophotometrically (Fig. 2).
Discussion
It is known that the final oxidation product of peroxynitrous acid, HOONO, is the isomeric nitric acid, HNO3 (35). However, the intermediate steps leading to this end-product are not well known (22). Beckman et al. (18) proposed that HNO3 is formed from a cascade of steps including the decomposition of HONOO to NO2 and the ⋅OH radical, followed by a cage-mediated recombination of these two intermediates to form HNO3, followed by deprotonation to NO3−. This mechanism is attractive because the ⋅OH radicals thus produced could account for the known oxidative properties of HOONO. However, the experimental evidence supporting an ⋅OH radical mechanism remains controversial (36, 37). Furthermore, Koppenool et al. (22) considered a variety of reaction mechanisms and primary decomposition products of ONOO− and concluded that the ⋅OH radical pathway was thermodynamically unfavorable. Instead, they proposed a new, strongly oxidizing intermediate, the vibrationally excited trans-peroxynitrous acid. However, this interpretation was questioned, particularly the assumptions concerning the entropy of hydration of ONOO− (38).
It is instructive to review the known structural features of peroxynitrite before considering the possible decomposition mechanisms in more detail. Theoretical calculations suggest that the cis-configuration of ONOO− is favored over the trans-configuration (39). It has been shown recently by x-ray crystallography that peroxynitrite indeed crystallizes in the cis form (40). The 15N-NMR data of Tsai et al. (39) also favors the cis-peroxynitrite form as the most stable and dominant isomer. The Raman spectrum of peroxynitrite in alkaline aqueous solution reveals an unusual broad band at 642 cm−1 that has been attributed to the ONOO− torsional motion of the cis-form (41). On the basis of this observation and other considerations, Tsai et al. concluded that the negative charge is delocalized over the entire planar cis-ONOO− molecule and that a weak hydrogen-bond-like interaction exists between the terminal oxygen atoms, thus forming a cyclic structure. The broadness of the 642 cm−1 band has been attributed to the heterogeneous interactions of the cis-ONOO− molecule with water molecules. Our results indicate that ONOO−, upon protonation, decomposes into 1O2 and NO−. The proposed weakly bonded cis-cyclic structure of ONOO− (41) can serve as a basis of a model that can account for this observation. We recall the well known decomposition of the four-membered strained-ring triphenyl phosphite-ozone adduct that dissociates into 1O2 via a spin-conserved process. In 1961, Thompson (42) reported that ozone and trialkyl phosphites form 1:1 adducts, which are stable at low temperatures (−78°C). Upon warming to −35°C, phosphates are produced, and molecular oxygen evolution is observed. On the basis of 31P-NMR measurements, it was concluded that the precursor triphenyl phosphite-ozone adduct has a four-membered cyclic structure (42). Furthermore, based on the principle of spin-conservation, in 1964, Corey and Taylor suggested that the molecular oxygen evolved in this reaction is singlet molecular oxygen (43). In 1969, Murray and Kaplan for solution (44), and Wasserman et al. for the gas phase (45), confirmed the generation of singlet molecular oxygen in the thermal dissociation of triphenylphosphite-ozone adduct according to the following scheme:
Proposed Ring Structure for Peroxynitrite.
Based on the considerations outlined above, it is reasonable to propose that, in alkaline aqueous solution, the peroxynitrite anion exists also as a four-membered strained ring, the latter being stabilized by interactions with water molecules.§ In this hypothesis (Fig. 5), the sum of the ring strain and the solvation free energy released on charge neutralization by protonation could provide the necessary energy for the generation of both the electronically excited 1O2 and the ground state 1HNO molecules (46). Because of the uncertainties associated with the thermodynamic parameters of ONOO− and related compounds (22, 38), a calculation associated with this reaction was not attempted here. A spin-conserved, acid-induced dissociation of peroxynitrite that generates 1O2 predicts the simultaneous generation of a singlet nitroxyl species, 1HNO, which deprotonates to form NO− at pH 7.0 because the pKa of HNO is 4.7 (47). The nitroxyl anion was trapped by MetHb to generate nitrosyl hemoglobin, HbNO. From Fig. 2, it is evident that the HbNO complex formation approaches saturation when the estimated OONO− concentration is equal to the MetHb concentration (Fig. 2). This suggests that a 1:1 complex of NO−:MetHb is formed and that the production of NO− from OONO− occurs in high yield, as observed previously in the decomposition of Angeli's salt into NO− trapped by MetHb (28).
Interaction of Peroxynitrite Anion with Bicarbonate.
Based on the kinetics of decay of peroxynitrite in the presence of sodium bicarbonate as a function of pH, Lymar and Hurst showed that dissolved CO2 enhanced the rate of decay of peroxynitrite (19). They proposed that an adduct ONOOCO2− is formed as a result and that the decomposition pathways of this adduct are different from those of ONOO− (48, 49). The details of the mechanisms of decomposition of the ONOOCO2− complex are not well understood (49). Our results show that, in the presence of HCO3−, the singlet oxygen trapping yield is decreased (Fig. 4). However, the results of the NO− trapping experiments by MetHb suggest that the concentration of NO− released by the decomposition of ONOO− in the presence of 25 mM NaHCO3 is not significantly affected (Fig. 2). This suggests that, within the decomposing intermediate ONOOCO2− complex (19), the electronically excited 1O2 state is quenched and therefore the yield of DPAO2 is diminished (Fig. 4). However, the concentration of NO− arising from the deprotonation of ground state 1HNO should remain unaffected, as observed experimentally (Fig. 2). Because bicarbonate is in equilibrium with CO2 in aqueous solutions, and because CO2 is not a quencher of 1O2 (50), the diminished yield of DPAO2 may arise from the interaction of 1O2 with HCO3−. However, this latter reaction has not yet been characterized.
Unimolecular Isomerization of Peroxynitrite to Nitrate Ion.
On the basis of previous thermodynamic and kinetic studies, it has been proposed that peroxynitrous acid, HOONO, isomerizes unimolecularly to HNO3, thus giving rise to the ultimate product NO3− (22). However, our results suggest that NO− is implicated in the ultimate formation of NO3−. In support of this suggestion, we recall that (i) NO− is quite easily oxidized in solution to NO by 3O2 and a variety of biological oxidants (51), and (ii) Ignarro et al. (52) have shown that, in aerobic aqueous solution, NO is first oxidized to nitrite (NO2−), and then to the NO3− ion. Oxidation of NO2− to NO3− requires the presence of additional oxidizing species.
The role of peroxynitrite in vivo is based largely on the detection of 3-nitrotyrosine in animal tissue inflammation (53). It is not yet known whether the mechanism of decomposition of ONOO− to NO− and 1O2 is operative in physiological systems or leads to the nitration of tyrosine or to DNA damage (54). Wogan and coworkers (17) have shown that ONOO− is mutagenic in the supF shuttle vector pS189 in bacteria or human cells; the mutational spectra induced by peroxynitrite are similar to the mutational patterns induced by 1O2. They suggested that genotoxic derivatives of peroxynitrite are likely to include species that have DNA-damaging properties resembling those of 1O2 in selectivity. Finally, macrophages and neutrophils are known sources of O2− and NO (2–4), hence of peroxynitrite as well. Steinbeck et al. (27, 55) have shown that macrophages and neutrophils indeed generate singlet oxygen in significant amounts, comparable to the amount of oxygen consumed in a respiratory burst.
Acknowledgments
The authors are deeply indebted to Dr. Thérèse Wilson for her interest in this research, her encouragement, and numerous stimulating discussions. The authors are also grateful to Olga Rechkoblit for her assistance. This project was supported by a grant from the New York University Research Challenge Fund and by a grant from the Kresge Foundation.
Abbreviations
- DPA
9,10-diphenylanthracene
- HbNO
nitrosylhemoglobin
- MetHb
methemoglobin
- TME
tetramethylethylene
Footnotes
Article published online before print: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.050587297.
Article and publication date are at www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.050587297
As suggested by a referee, it is conceivable that further research (e.g., by isotope labeling of oxygen, 18O or 17O) could establish whether the cyclic structure is a transition state or a stable intermediate.
References
- 1.Huie R E, Padmaja S. Free Radical Res Commun. 1993;18:195–199. doi: 10.3109/10715769309145868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Marletta M A, Yoon P S, Leaf C D, Wishnok J S. Biochemistry. 1988;27:8706–8711. doi: 10.1021/bi00424a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xia Y, Zweier J L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:6954–6958. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.McCall T B, Boughton-Smith N K, Palmer R M J, Whittle B J R, Moncada S. Biochem J. 1989;261:293–296. doi: 10.1042/bj2610293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ignarro L J, Buga G M, Wood K S, Byrns R E, Chaudhuri G. Proc Natl Acad Soc USA. 1987;84:9265–9269. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vasquez-Vivar J, Kalyanaraman B, Martasek P, Hogg N, Masters B S S, Karoui H, Torodo P, Pritchard K A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:9220–9225. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ischiropoulous H, Zhu L, Beckman J S. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1992;298:446–451. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(92)90433-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Carreras M C, Pargament G A, Catz SD, Poderoso J J, Boveris A. FEBS Lett. 1994;341:65–68. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)80241-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xia Y, Dawson V L, Dawson T M, Snyder S H, Zweier J L. Proc Natl Acad USA. 1996;93:6770–6774. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.13.6770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Feig D I, Reid T M, Loeb L A. Cancer Res. 1994;54,Suppl.:1890s–1894s. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.White R C, Brock T A, Chang L, Crapo J, Brisco P, Ku D, Bradley W A, Gianturco S H, Gore J, Freeman B, Tarpey M M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:1044–1048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.3.1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Oury T D, Piantadosi C L, Crapo J D. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:15394–15398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beckman J S, Carson M, Smith C D, Koppenol W H. Nature (London) 1993;364:584. doi: 10.1038/364584a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pryor W, Squadrito G L. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:L699–L722. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1995.268.5.L699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Radi R, Beckman J S, Bush K M, Freeman B A. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1991;288:481–487. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(91)90224-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ischiropoulous H, Al-Mehdi A B. FEBS Lett. 1995;364:279–282. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00307-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jeong J K, Juedes M J, Wogan G N. Chem Res Toxicol. 1998;11:550–556. doi: 10.1021/tx980008a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Beckman J S, Beckman T W, Chen J, Marshall P A, Freeman B A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:1620–1624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.4.1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lymar S V, Hurst J K. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:8867–8868. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Marnett L J. Chem Res Toxicol. 1998;11:709–721. doi: 10.1021/tx980500u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fukuto J M, Ignarro L G. Acc Chem Res. 1997;30:149–152. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Koppenol W H, Moreno J J, Pryor W A, Ischiropoulos H, Beckman J S. Chem Res Toxicol. 1992;5:834–842. doi: 10.1021/tx00030a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Khan A U. J Biolumin Chemilumin. 1995;10:329–333. doi: 10.1002/bio.1170100604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Held A M, Halko D J, Hurst J K. J Am Chem Soc. 1978;100:5732–5740. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wasserman H H, Scheffer J R, Cooper J L. J Am Chem Soc. 1972;94:4991–4996. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Turro N, Chow M-F, Rigaudy J. J Am Chem Soc. 1981;103:7218–7224. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Steinbeck M J, Khan A U, Karnovsky M J. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:13425–13433. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bazylinski D A, Hollocher T C. J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:7982–7986. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hughes M N, Nicklin . J. Chem. Soc. A. 1968. 450–452. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang J H. In: Oxygenases. Hayaishi O, editor. New York: Academic; 1962. p. 472. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kern C E. J Chem Educ. 1960;37:14–23. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Antonini E, Brunori M. Hemoglobin and Myoglobin in Their Reactions with Ligands. Amsterdam: North–Holland; 1971. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wilkinson F, Brummer J G. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 1981;10:809–999. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Koo J, Schuster G B. J Am Chem Soc. 1978;100:4496–4503. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ray J D. J Inorg Nucl Chem. 1962;24:1159–1162. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Moreno J J, Pryor W A. Chem Res Toxicol. 1992;5:425–431. doi: 10.1021/tx00027a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Van der Vilet A, O'Neil C A, Halliwell B, Cross C E, Kaur H. FEBS Lett. 1994;339:89–92. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)80391-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Merenyi G, Lind J. Chem Res Toxicol. 1997;10:1216–1220. doi: 10.1021/tx970101j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tsai H, Hamilton T P, Tsai J M, van der Woerd M, Harrison J G, Jablonsky M J, Beckman J S, Koppenol W H. J Phys Chem. 1996;100:15087–15095. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Worle M, Latal P, Kissner R, Nesper R, Koppenol W H. Chem Res Toxicol. 1999;12:305–307. doi: 10.1021/tx990013u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tsai J M, Harrison J G, Martin J C, Hamilton T P, van der Woerd M, Jablonsky M J, Beckman J S. J Am Chem Soc. 1994;116:4115–4116. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thompson Q E. J Am Chem Soc. 1961;83:845–851. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Corey E J, Taylor W C. J Am Chem Soc. 1964;86:3881–3882. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Murray R W, Kaplan M L. J Am Chem Soc. 1969;90:537–538. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wasserman E, Murray R W, Kaplan M L, Yager W A. J Am Chem Soc. 1969;90:4160–4161. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wu A A, Peyerimhoff S D, Buenker R J. Chem Phys Lett. 1978;35:316–322. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gratzel M, Taniguchi S, Henglein A. Ber Bunsenges Phys Chem. 1970;74:1003–1010. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Uppu R M, Squadrito G L, Pryor W A. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996;327:335–343. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1996.0131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bartberger M D, Olson L P, Houk K N. Chem Res Toxicol. 1998;11:710–711. doi: 10.1021/tx9800553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ogryzlo E A. In: Singlet Oxygen. Wasserman H H, Murray R W, editors. New York: Academic; 1979. pp. 35–58. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fukuto J M, Hobbs A J, Ignarro L J. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;196:707–713. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ignarro L J, Fukuto J M, Griscavage J M, Rogers N E, Byrns R E. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:8103–8107. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kooy N W, Lewis S J, Royall J A, Ye Y Z, Kelly D R, Beckman J S. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:812–819. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199705000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Burney S, Caulfield J L, Niles J C, Wishnok J S, Tannenbaum S R. Mutat Res. 1999;424:37–49. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(99)00006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Steinbeck M J, Khan A U, Karnovsky M J. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:15649–15654. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]