Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1980 Apr;70(4):389–393. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.4.389

Changing trends in hypertension detection and control: the Chicago experience.

D M Berkson, M C Brown, H Stanton, J Masterson, L Shireman, D K Ausbrook, D Mikes, I T Whipple, H H Muriel
PMCID: PMC1619398  PMID: 7361957

Abstract

Of 177,692 persons screened in 1977 as part of an ongoing City-Wide Hypertension Screening Program in Chicago, 14,988 (8.4%) had diastolic blood pressure (BP) greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg as compared to 13.2% of a similar population in 1976. Only 7% (3,910) of the hypertensive population (diastolic BP greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg or presently on antipressor drugs) had previously undetected hypertension in contrast to 11.9% (4,184) the year before and 48.7% in the same community in 1972. Conversely, 73.2% (40,738) had adequately controlled blood pressure as contrasted to 59.3% (20,897) the previous year and 20.6% in 1972. Of the remaining hypertensives, 7.5% (4,201) were known but not treated and 12.3% (6,824) were under treatment but not controlled in contrast to 12.1% (4,251) and 16.8% (5,905) respectively the year before. This upward trend in controlled hypertension was present in all strata of the population.

Full text

PDF
389

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adamson H. G. Lupus Exuberans with Miliary Lupus. Proc R Soc Med. 1915;8(DERMATOL):17–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blood pressure studies in 14 communities. A two-stage screen for hypertension. JAMA. 1977 May 30;237(22):2385–2391. doi: 10.1001/jama.1977.03270490025018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg. JAMA. 1970 Aug 17;213(7):1143–1152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg. JAMA. 1967 Dec 11;202(11):1028–1034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schoenberger J. A., Stamler J., Shekelle R. B., Shekelle S. Current status of hypertension control in an industrial population. JAMA. 1972 Oct 30;222(5):559–562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stamler J., Stamler R., Riedlinger W. F., Algera G., Roberts R. H. Hypertension screening of 1 million Americans. Community Hypertension Evaluation Clinic (CHEC) program, 1973 through 1975. JAMA. 1976 May 24;235(21):2299–2306. doi: 10.1001/jama.235.21.2299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wilber J. A., Barrow J. G. Reducing elevated blood pressure. Experience found in a community. Minn Med. 1969 Aug;52(8):1303–1306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES