Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1980 May;70(5):514–519. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.5.514

Expanded home-based care for the impaired elderly: solution or pipe dream?

B D Dunlop
PMCID: PMC1619416  PMID: 7377422

Abstract

Benefits assumed by those calling for massive expansion of home health care to include preventive, health-supportive services for the dependent aged--reduced institutionalization, reduced stress among family caregivers, and enhanced life-satisfaction for the dependent elderly--have been the objects of inadequate research and reflection. Advocates are unable to specify exactly what kind of person could benefit or who would seek to use such services. The little evidence that exists suggests that these benefits may be realized only partially and/or only among select segments of the population affected. A significantly reduced rate of institutionalization appears especially questionable. Only for a relatively small group, those mildly impaired persons without close kin (who now sometimes end up in lower level nursing homes or domiciliary care homes due to absence of this resource), does expansion of long-term maintenance services appear at this point to hold such potential. Local experiments with expanded home-based programs suggest that there may be a number of factors which could limit demand for such services. Carefully designed research to address these issues is needed.

Full text

PDF
514

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barney J. L. The prerogative of choice in long-term care. Gerontologist. 1977 Aug;17(4):309–314. doi: 10.1093/geront/17.4.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brickner P. W., Janeski J. F., Rich G., Duque T., Starita L., LaRocco R., Flannery T., Werlin S. Home maintenance for the home-bound aged. A pilot program in New York City. Gerontologist. 1976 Feb;16(1 PT1):25–29. doi: 10.1093/geront/16.1_part_1.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brody S. J., Poulshock S. W., Masciocchi C. F. The family caring unit: a major consideration in the long-term support system. Gerontologist. 1978 Dec;18(6):556–561. doi: 10.1093/geront/18.6.556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dunlop B. D. Need for and utilization of long-term care among elderly americans. J Chronic Dis. 1976 Feb;29(2):75–87. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(76)90008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hay D. G. Some observations of long-term health care facilities in Great Britain. Long Term Care Health Serv Adm Q. 1979 Spring;3(1):58–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Little V. C. Open care for the aged: Swedish model. Soc Work. 1978 Jul;23(4):282–287. doi: 10.1093/sw/23.4.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nielsen M., Blenkner M., Bloom M., Downs T., Beggs H. Older persons after hospitalization: a controlled study of home aide service. Am J Public Health. 1972 Aug;62(8):1094–1101. doi: 10.2105/ajph.62.8.1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Treas J. Family support systems for the aged: some social and demographic considerations. Gerontologist. 1977 Dec;17(6):486–491. doi: 10.1093/geront/17.6.486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. York J. L., Calsyn R. J. Family involvement in nursing homes. Gerontologist. 1977 Dec;17(6):500–505. doi: 10.1093/geront/17.6.500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES