Abstract
To explore the problem of response error in food history data, a prospective study examined the validity of food questionnaire data obtained five days after the study meal. Unobtrusive observation of 64 persons selecting two different foods at a buffet-style luncheon were compared with subsequent histories of food consumption. The predictive value of a positive response was 0.73 for one food and 0.82 for the second food. The response error measures obtained were then applied to data from a published foodborne outbreak to illustrate the impact of predictive value positive and predictive value negative levels on the significance of a food-illness association. Public health workers engaged in food questionnaire administration and analysis must consider response error and should explore methods of reducing this problem through attention to both interviewer-respondent interaction and questionnaire design.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Galen R. S. Predictive value and efficiency of laboratory testing. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1980 Nov;27(4):861–869. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)33930-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graham S. Diet and cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Aug;112(2):247–252. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hankin J. H., Rhoads G. G., Glober G. A. A dietary method for an epidemiologic study of gastrointestinal cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 1975 Sep;28(9):1055–1060. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/28.9.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horwitz M. A., Pollard R. A., Merson M. H., Martin S. M. A large outbreak of foodborne salmonellosis on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation, epidemiology and secondary transmission. Am J Public Health. 1977 Nov;67(11):1071–1076. doi: 10.2105/ajph.67.11.1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]