Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 2003 Jul 1;112(1):19–22. doi: 10.1172/JCI19091

Novel antibody switching defects in human patients

John P Manis 1,2, Frederick W Alt 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC162297  PMID: 12840053

Abstract

Hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGM) is a primary immunodeficiency characterized by normal to elevated serum levels of IgM and low levels or the absence of IgG, IgA, and IgE. A new study AID expression in nonlymphoid cells (see related article on pages 136–142) characterizes HIGM type 4, a previously undocumented defect in antibody gene diversification caused by a selective block in class-switch recombination, providing significant insight towards understanding HIGM immunodeficiencies.


B cells mediate humoral immunity by producing antibodies, which are comprised of immunoglobulin heavy (IgH) and light (IgL) chains. The N-terminal variable region of antibodies is responsible for specific antigen binding. The IgH and IgL variable regions are encoded by exons that are assembled from germline V, D, and J gene segments during early lymphocyte development via V(D)J recombination. The C-terminal end of the IgH chain is termed the IgH constant region (CH) and is responsible for determining both class of antibody and effector functions once it binds to a specific antigen (1). There are additional CH exons (referred to as CH genes lying in the several hundred kilobases downstream of the V(D)J exons in the IgH locus (Figure 1a). The V(D)J is initially expressed in conjunction with the Cμ gene to form the μ heavy chain which, in association with IgL chain, forms IgM antibody (1). Once IgM+ B cells engage antigen, two additional genetic alterations can occur to improve clearance of antibody-antigen complex or to increase binding affinity for antigen. In class switch recombination (CSR), the CH is switched from μ to a downstream Cγ, Cε, or Cα gene, leading, respectively, to generation of IgG, IgE, or IgA isotypes with a corresponding change in antibody effector function (1). CSR involves deletional recombination between the switch region of the μ heavy chain (Sμ region) upstream of Cμ and a similarly positioned S region of a downstream CH, allowing the V(D)J exon to be juxtaposed to and expressed with a different CH gene (Figure 1a). A second antigen-dependent B cell genetic alteration, termed somatic hypermutation (SHM), involves introduction of point mutations at a high rate specifically into the IgH and IgL variable region exons, allowing for selection of a higher affinity antibody (2). Both CSR and SHM require transcription through target S regions or V(D)J exons and also require activation induced deaminase (AID), an induced B cell-specific protein, showing that they share substantial mechanistic overlap, despite being unique processes (1, 3–5). Inherited defects in class-switch recombination result in an immunodeficiency termed the hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGM), characterized by normal to elevated serum IgM but diminished levels of other IgH isotype classes. Mutations in the CD40-ligand or CD40-receptor impair proper B cell activation and are the cause of HIGM1 and HIGM3 respectively. Mutations in activation-induced deaminase (AID) underlie HIGM2. Both Aid-deficient mice and HIGM2 patients that lack functional AID have high levels of IgM but do not undergo CSR or SHM, showing that AID is absolutely necessary for these processes (5, 6). In addition, forced AID expression in nonlymphoid cells can generate CSR or SHM in reporter substrates, indicating that AID expression is sufficient to generate CSR and SHM (7), at least at low levels. The CSR block in AID-defective B cells is downstream of events leading to cellular activation and germline transcription (5), and most likely involves a defect in the generation of DNA lesions that initiate CSR (8). Most evidence favors a similar role for AID in SHM (4) (see below). AID has homology to RNA-editing cytidine deaminases, which led to the model that it may generate a novel recombinase involved with CSR or SHM via RNA-editing (7). However, current evidence implicates DNA as the relevant AID substrate. In bacteria, AID-overexpression results in preferential mutation at dC/dG nucleotide pairs, proposed to be a consequence of DNA cytidine deaminase activity generating G-U mispairs and triggering the uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) DNA repair pathway (9). In this context, Ung-deficient mice exhibit a substantial defect in both CSR and in SHM, indicating that this repair pathway may function downstream of AID in both processes (10). Most recently, biochemical studies showed that AID has DNA cytidine deaminase activity on single-strand (SS), but not double-strand (DS) DNA in vitro (1113); and that AID could be targeted to DS DNA via transcription (12). Moreover, gene-targeted S region mutations in mice provided in vivo evidence for the model that transcriptionally-generated SS DNA structures in S regions are physiological CSR substrates, and other studies showed that relevant structures (R-loops) form in vivo in the context of S region transcription (14, 15). Therefore, transcription through S regions appears to lead to generation of SS DNA substrates for AID, which then serves to initiate CSR via DNA cytidine deamination (Figure 1b). In addition, bacterial studies have implicated transcription as generating SS DNA substrates for AID in the context of mutation (16).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) The rearranged V(D)J exon is located immediately upstream of the μ constant region with all other classes of murine constant region genes lying downstream, with each (except Cδ) preceded by repetitive DNA sequences (termed switch (S) regions) that are between 1-12 kb in length. (b) The variable region exon or S regions targeted for modification are rendered accessible by transcription. Secondary structures, shown here for S regions, are formed and allow for direct SS DNA modification by AID, resulting in dU/dG mismatches. Differential sensing, processing, and resolution of these mismatches results in distinct outcomes for CSR or SHM.

CSR defects downstream of AID activity

There are still many unsolved questions regarding CSR and SHM, including why deaminated cytidines are repaired in an error-prone fashion, and what specifies a CSR versus SHM fate for deaminated DNA sequences. In addition, the mechanism by which AID is targeted to variable region sequences during SHM appears distinct from that which targets it to S regions and may involve additional factors to generate SS DNA substrates (12). Also, little is known about the factors involved downstream of AID in CSR, particularly in the context of the precise nature of the differential repair pathways utilized and also with respect to the factors that mediate synapsis of two recombining S regions. Given these clear differences in the processes, potential defects in post-AID–dependent steps of CSR and SHM might be expected to lead to the generation of B cells with differentially impaired CSR and/or SHM. In this issue of the JCI, Imai et al. (17) now, in fact, describe a novel subset of HIGM patients (termed HIGM4) who have defective CSR but normal SHM. In HIGM4 patient B cells, CSR events upstream of AID activation, including germline CH transcription, were normal; a ligation-mediated PCR assay detected blunt DSB’s in the Sμ region suggesting that AID initiated the process. However, there was no production of mature IgH transcripts or secreted antibodies indicating that CSR was defective in the HIGM4 B cells despite both AID and S region activation. Strikingly, SHM in these patients was normal in both numbers of cells mutated, as well as in overall mutation load. Finally, HIGM4 B cells proliferated normally following stimulation for CSR indicating that the defect is not associated with overall cellular survival, as is seen in certain murine NHEJ-deficient B cells (1). Thus, these findings imply a selective defect in CSR versus SHM that occurs downstream of AID in HIGM4 syndrome, indicating that HIGM4 B cells may provide an important reagent for further elucidation of events specific to CSR. In this regard, it is not known whether all HIGM4 mutations affect the same factor or represent several different defects that manifest a common phenotype.

Selective targeting of CSR versus SHM

What processes may distinguish CSR and SHM and, thereby, be potential targets of HIGM4 mutations? Although DNA cytidine deamination is common to both processes, CSR and SHM can occur differentially in B cells, generate distinct products, and are likely resolved by separate repair pathways (18, 19). Thus, AID is specifically targeted to the appropriate Ig sequence (V[D]J vs. S regions) with subsequent processing of the deaminated cytidines occurring in such a way as to promote either CSR or SHM. SHM and CSR probably generate distinct secondary structures that are targets for AID. S regions, due to their unique base composition, can form transcription-dependent higher order structures, such as R loops, which provide SS DNA targets for AID. However, such structures are not expected to occur in SHM target sequences; in this process, a transient SS DNA transcription bubble in the variable region exon may help provide an AID substrate (16, 18). In this regard, AID may be associated in different factor complexes at target V(D)J or S region sequences and serve to recruit different CSR- or SHM-specific AID-cofactors (3, 19). While it seems likely that most putative cofactors of this type would be intact in HIGM4 B cells as S region breaks were detected upon activation, there is still potential for such a CSR-specific factor. Thus, HIGM4 cells were examined only for Sμ breaks and not for downstream S region breaks; leaving open the possibility of a defect in downstream S region targeting factor. Also, the differential fate of AID-induced dU residues at V(D)J exons or S regions may be linked to aspects of mismatch recognition (18, 20). In this regard, S regions may allow generation of higher density of AID-dU modifications potentially leading to a greater likelihood of generating staggered DNA breaks on both DNA strands by downstream damage recognition pathways and, thereby, engage a different subset of factors than SHM.

Differential processing and repair

With respect to potential downstream events that may distinguish CSR from SHM, there are other potentially involved processes/factors worth considering. The nature of the final products of SHM (point mutations) and of CSR (joining of two S regions) suggests involvement of a distinct repair pathway for each process. CSR requires synapsis of two S regions that may be separated by over 100 kb, with the deletion of the intervening DNA. Putative synapsis factors required for CSR may not be involved in SHM as the latter process involves nucleotide changes made over relatively short sequences. Absence of such a putative CSR-synapsis factor might manifest defects similar to those seen in HIGM4. In this regard, it is notable that cell cycle checkpoint/repair deficiencies (e.g., ataxia-telangiectasia mutated, Nijmegen breakage syndrome) affect CSR (21). In addition, deficiencies in the Histone H2AX protein substantially impairs CSR (7) and may lead to S region translocations (C. Bassing and F.W. Alt, unpublished observations). While the mechanism of these defects is not clearly understood, there is a possibility that one or all may be directly or indirectly involved in synapsis. It is also worth noting that CSR requires an intact NHEJ pathway of DNA DSB repair, that along with other evidence, has led to arguments that CSR involves DSB’s that ultimately are joined by NHEJ (1, 19). In contrast, SHM does not appear to involve NHEJ (19). While it seems unlikely that defects in NHEJ would underlie the HIGM4 syndrome, as these would also lead to a SCID phenotype due to defective V(D)J recombination, it is worth noting that absence of a particular NHEJ factor, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit, preferentially affects CSR versus SHM (19).

Whatever its basis, the newly described HIGM4 defect once again illustrates the power of defining human disease mechanisms with respect to elucidating basic physiological processes. Thus, further characterization of HIGM4 mutations may well provide a potent means to further elucidate processes involved in CSR events downstream of AID, which is now one of the major unsolved problems in this field.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ming Tian, Jayanta Chaudhuri, and Katrin Chua for helpful discussions. This work was supported by NIH grant AI31541 (F.W. Alt) and Lymphoma Research Foundation Grant (J.P. Manis). F.W. Alt is an Investigator for the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Footnotes

See the related article beginning on page 136.

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Nonstandard abbreviations used: immunoglobulin heavy (IgH); immunoglobulin light (IgL); IgH constant region (CH); class-switch recombination (CSR); switch region of the μ heavy chain (Sμ region); somatic hypermutation (SHM); activation-induced deaminase (AID); hyper IgM syndrome (HIGM); uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG); double-strand (DS); single-strand (SS); ligation-mediated PCR (LM-PCR); double-strand break (DSB).

References

  • 1.Manis JP, Tian M, Alt FW. Mechanism and control of class-switch recombination. Trends Immunol. 2002;23:31–39. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(01)02111-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Papavasiliou FN, Schatz DG. Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes: merging mechanisms for genetic diversity. Cell. 2002;109:S35–S44. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00706-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Faili A, et al. AID-dependent somatic hypermutation occurs as a DNA single-strand event in the BL2 cell line. Nat. Immunol. 2002;3:815–821. doi: 10.1038/ni826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chua KF, Alt FW, Manis JP. The function of AID in somatic mutation and class switch recombination: upstream or downstream of DNA breaks. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195:F37–F41. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Muramatsu M, et al. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell. 2000;102:553–563. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Revy P, et al. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) deficiency causes the autosomal recessive form of the Hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGM2) Cell. 2000;102:565–575. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00079-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Honjo T, Kinoshita K, Muramatsu M. Molecular mechanism of class switch recombination: linkage with somatic hypermutation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2002;20:165–196. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.090501.112049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Petersen S, et al. AID is required to initiate Nbs1/gamma-H2AX focus formation and mutations at sites of class switching. Nature. 2001;414:660–665. doi: 10.1038/414660a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Petersen-Mahrt SK, Harris RS, Neuberger MS. AID mutates E. coli suggesting a DNA deamination mechanism for antibody diversification. Nature. 2002;418:99–103. doi: 10.1038/nature00862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rada C, et al. Immunoglobulin isotype switching is inhibited and somatic hypermutation perturbed in UNG-deficient mice. Curr. Biol. 2002;12:1748–1755. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01215-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dickerson SK, Market E, Besmer E, Papavasiliou FN. AID Mediates Hypermutation by Deaminating Single Stranded DNA. J. Exp. Med. 2003;197:1291–1296. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chaudhuri J, et al. Transcription-targeted DNA deamination by the AID antibody diversification enzyme. Nature. 2003;422:726–730. doi: 10.1038/nature01574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bransteitter R, Pham P, Scharff MD, Goodman MF. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates deoxycytidine on a single-stranded DNA but requires the action of RNase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003;100:4102–4107. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0730835100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shinkura R, et al. The influence of transcriptional orientation on endogenous switch region function. Nat. Immunol. 2003;4:435–441. doi: 10.1038/ni918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yu K, Chedin F, Hsieh CL, Wilson TE, Lieber MR. R-loops at immunoglobulin class switch regions in the chromosomes of stimulated B cells. Nat. Immunol. 2003;4:442–451. doi: 10.1038/ni919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ramiro AR, Stavropoulos P, Jankovic M, Nussenzweig MC. Transcription enhances AID-mediated cytidine deamination by exposing single-stranded DNA on the nontemplate strand. Nat. Immunol. 2003;4:452–456. doi: 10.1038/ni920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Imai K, et al. Hyper-IgM syndrome type 4 with a B lymphocyte–intrinsic selective deficiency in Ig class-switch recombination. J. Clin. Invest. 2003;112:136–142. doi:10.1172/JCI200318161. doi: 10.1172/JCI18161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Storb U, Stavnezer J. Immunoglobulin genes: generating diversity with AID and UNG. Current Biology. 2002;12:725–727. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01247-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kenter AL. Class-switch recombination: after the dawn of AID. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2003;15:190–198. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(03)00018-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Martin A, Scharff MD. AID and mismatch repair in antibody diversification. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2:605–614. doi: 10.1038/nri858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pan Q, et al. Alternative end joining during switch recombination in patients with ataxia-telangiectasia. 2002. Eur. J. Immunol. 2002;32:1300–1308. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200205)32:5<1300::AID-IMMU1300>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES