Abstract
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the interlaboratory agreement of broth dilution susceptibility methods for five species of conidium-forming (size range, 2 to 7 microns) filamentous fungi. The methods used included both macro- and microdilution methods that were adaptations of the proposed reference method of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for yeasts (m27-P). The MICs of amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, miconazole, and ketoconazole were determined in six centers by both macro- and microdilution tests for 25 isolates of Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Pseudallescheria boydii, Rhizopus arrhizus, and Sporothrix schenckii. All isolates produced clearly detectable growth within 1 to 4 days at 35 degrees C in the RPMI 1640 medium. Colony counts of 0.4 x 10(6) to 3.3 x 10(6) CFU/ml (mean, 1.4 x 10(6) CFU/ml) were demonstrated in 90% of the 148 inoculum preparations. Overall, good intralaboratory agreement was demonstrated with amphotericin B, fluconazole, and ketoconazole MICs (90 to 97%). The agreement was lower with itraconazole MICs (59 to 79% median). Interlaboratory reproducibility demonstrated similar results: 90 to 100% agreement with amphotericin B, fluconazole, miconazole, and ketoconazole MICs and 59 to 91% with itraconazole MICs. Among the species tested, the MICs for S. schenckii showed the highest variability. The results of the study imply that it may be possible to develop a reference method for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (285.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Espinel-Ingroff A., Kerkering T. M., Goldson P. R., Shadomy S. Comparison study of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jun;29(6):1089–1094. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.6.1089-1094.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Espinel-Ingroff A., Kerkering T. M. Spectrophotometric method of inoculum preparation for the in vitro susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Feb;29(2):393–394. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.2.393-394.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Espinel-Ingroff A., Kish C. W., Jr, Kerkering T. M., Fromtling R. A., Bartizal K., Galgiani J. N., Villareal K., Pfaller M. A., Gerarden T., Rinaldi M. G. Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3138–3145. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3138-3145.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fromtling R. A., Galgiani J. N., Pfaller M. A., Espinel-Ingroff A., Bartizal K. F., Bartlett M. S., Body B. A., Frey C., Hall G., Roberts G. D. Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Jan;37(1):39–45. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galgiani J. N., Reiser J., Brass C., Espinel-Ingroff A., Gordon M. A., Kerkering T. M. Comparison of relative susceptibilities of Candida species to three antifungal agents as determined by unstandardized methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Sep;31(9):1343–1347. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.9.1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobayashi G. S., Spitzer E. D. Testing of organisms for susceptibility to triazoles: is it justified? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 May;8(5):387–389. doi: 10.1007/BF01964051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaller M. A., Burmeister L., Bartlett M. S., Rinaldi M. G. Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Aug;26(8):1437–1441. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1437-1441.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfaller M. A., Rinaldi M. G., Galgiani J. N., Bartlett M. S., Body B. A., Espinel-Ingroff A., Fromtling R. A., Hall G. S., Hughes C. E., Odds F. C. Collaborative investigation of variables in susceptibility testing of yeasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Sep;34(9):1648–1654. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.9.1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]