Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1995 Mar;39(3):638–644. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.3.638

French multicenter study involving eight test sites for radiometric determination of activities of 10 antimicrobial agents against Mycobacterium avium complex.

N Rastogi 1, R M Bauriaud 1, A Bourgoin 1, B Carbonnelle 1, C Chippaux 1, M J Gevaudan 1, K S Goh 1, D Moinard 1, P Roos 1
PMCID: PMC162597  PMID: 7793865

Abstract

The radiometric BACTEC 460-TB methodology has filled an increased need in the screening of a wide range of antimicrobial agents against Mycobacterium avium (MAC) isolates on a patient-to-patient basis. In this context, a multicenter study involving eight test sites across France was performed to determine the MICs of 10 antimicrobial agents for MAC organisms. The aim of the investigation was to compare the in vitro activities of D-cycloserine, ethambutol, ethionamide, rifampin, amikacin, streptomycin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, clofazimine, and clarithromycin against MAC isolates. All of the test sites received the same clinical isolates of MAC, and the MICs were determined by a common protocol. The overall interlaboratory reproducibility of the MICs within +/- 1 dilution of the modal MICs varied from 79.70 to 100% (mean, 95.2% +/- 2.1%), whereas overall agreement of the MICs among the test sites varied from a mean of 91% +/- 4.1% to a mean of 98 +/- 1.3%. We confirmed that the proposed methodology is easy, accurate, and sufficiently reproducible to be used routinely in a clinical laboratory. Despite variations in the MICs of the same drug among strains, no link between the origin of MAC isolates (from human immunodeficiency virus-positive or -negative patients) and their drug susceptibilities was established. On the basis of the MICs that inhibited 50 and 90% of isolates tested for the drugs used, clarithromycin, clofazimine, ethambutol, and streptomycin were the most uniformly active against MAC; this was followed by amikacin, rifampin, and sparfloxacin. On the other hand, ciprofloxacin, D-cycloserine, and ethionamide showed only marginal in vitro activities.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (271.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agins B. D., Berman D. S., Spicehandler D., el-Sadr W., Simberkoff M. S., Rahal J. J. Effect of combined therapy with ansamycin, clofazimine, ethambutol, and isoniazid for Mycobacterium avium infection in patients with AIDS. J Infect Dis. 1989 Apr;159(4):784–787. doi: 10.1093/infdis/159.4.784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baron E. J., Young L. S. Amikacin, ethambutol, and rifampin for treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare infections in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Sep;5(3):215–220. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90004-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CANETTI G., FROMAN S., GROSSET J., HAUDUROY P., LANGEROVA M., MAHLER H. T., MEISSNER G., MITCHISON D. A., SULA L. MYCOBACTERIA: LABORATORY METHODS FOR TESTING DRUG SENSITIVITY AND RESISTANCE. Bull World Health Organ. 1963;29:565–578. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiu J., Nussbaum J., Bozzette S., Tilles J. G., Young L. S., Leedom J., Heseltine P. N., McCutchan J. A. Treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection in AIDS with amikacin, ethambutol, rifampin, and ciprofloxacin. California Collaborative Treatment Group. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Sep 1;113(5):358–361. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-5-358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. David H. L. Basis for lack of drug susceptibility of atypical mycobacteria. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 Sep-Oct;3(5):878–884. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.5.878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Heifets L. MIC as a quantitative measurement of the susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium strains to seven antituberculosis drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Aug;32(8):1131–1136. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.8.1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoffner S. E., Svenson S. B., Källenius G. Synergistic effects of antimycobacterial drug combinations on Mycobacterium avium complex determined radiometrically in liquid medium. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Oct;6(5):530–535. doi: 10.1007/BF02014241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoy J., Mijch A., Sandland M., Grayson L., Lucas R., Dwyer B. Quadruple-drug therapy for Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare bacteremia in AIDS patients. J Infect Dis. 1990 Apr;161(4):801–805. doi: 10.1093/infdis/161.4.801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Prince D. S., Peterson D. D., Steiner R. M., Gottlieb J. E., Scott R., Israel H. L., Figueroa W. G., Fish J. E. Infection with Mycobacterium avium complex in patients without predisposing conditions. N Engl J Med. 1989 Sep 28;321(13):863–868. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198909283211304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rastogi N., Barrow W. W. Laboratory and clinical aspects of the Mycobacterium avium epidemic: contributing factors associated with variability of drug susceptibility and immune responsiveness, and the multifaceted nature of pathogenicity. Res Microbiol. 1994 Mar-Apr;145(3):167–168. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(94)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rastogi N. Emergence of multiple-drug-resistant tuberculosis: fundamental and applied research aspects, global issues and current strategies. Res Microbiol. 1993 Feb;144(2):103–103. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(93)90022-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rastogi N., Frehel C., Ryter A., Ohayon H., Lesourd M., David H. L. Multiple drug resistance in Mycobacterium avium: is the wall architecture responsible for exclusion of antimicrobial agents? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Nov;20(5):666–677. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.5.666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rastogi N., Goh K. S., David H. L. Drug susceptibility testing in tuberculosis: a comparison of the proportion methods using Lowenstein-Jensen, Middlebrook 7H10 and 7H11 agar media and a radiometric method. Res Microbiol. 1989 Jul-Aug;140(6):405–417. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(89)90016-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rastogi N., Goh K. S., David H. L. Enhancement of drug susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium by inhibitors of cell envelope synthesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 May;34(5):759–764. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.5.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rastogi N., Goh K. S., Guillou N., Labrousse V. Spectrum of drugs against atypical mycobacteria: how valid is the current practice of drug susceptibility testing and the choice of drugs? Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1992 Dec;277(4):474–484. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80472-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rastogi N., Labrousse V. Extracellular and intracellular activities of clarithromycin used alone and in association with ethambutol and rifampin against Mycobacterium avium complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Mar;35(3):462–470. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.3.462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rastogi N., Labrousse V., Goh K. S., De Sousa J. P. Antimycobacterial spectrum of sparfloxacin and its activities alone and in association with other drugs against Mycobacterium avium complex growing extracellularly and intracellularly in murine and human macrophages. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Dec;35(12):2473–2480. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.12.2473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Siddiqi S. H., Hawkins J. E., Laszlo A. Interlaboratory drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a radiometric procedure and two conventional methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;22(6):919–923. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.6.919-923.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Siddiqi S. H., Heifets L. B., Cynamon M. H., Hooper N. M., Laszlo A., Libonati J. P., Lindholm-Levy P. J., Pearson N. Rapid broth macrodilution method for determination of MICs for Mycobacterium avium isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Sep;31(9):2332–2338. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.9.2332-2338.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Siddiqi S. H., Libonati J. P., Middlebrook G. Evaluation of rapid radiometric method for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 May;13(5):908–912. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.5.908-912.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stauffer F., Dörtbudak O., Lahonik E. In vitro testing of clarithromycin in combination with ethambutol and rifampicin against Mycobacterium avium complex. Infection. 1991 Sep-Oct;19(5):343–345. doi: 10.1007/BF01645362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yajko D. M. In vitro activity of antimicrobial agents against the Mycobacterium avium complex inside macrophages from HIV1-infected individuals: the link to clinical response to treatment? Res Microbiol. 1992 May;143(4):411–419. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(92)90055-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES