Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1995 Mar;39(3):760–762. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.3.760

Susceptibilities of Chlamydia trachomatis isolates causing uncomplicated female genital tract infections and pelvic inflammatory disease.

R J Rice 1, V Bhullar 1, S H Mitchell 1, J Bullard 1, J S Knapp 1
PMCID: PMC162620  PMID: 7793888

Abstract

The in vitro susceptibilities of 45 recent clinical isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis obtained from women with asymptomatic genital tract infection, mucopurulent cervicitis, or pelvic inflammatory disease to doxycycline, azithromycin, ofloxacin, and clindamycin were determined. In addition, susceptibilities of 12 isolates to amoxicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were also determined. Isolates also were serotyped with a panel of monoclonal antibodies specific for chlamydial major outer membrane protein; 24 of 45 (53%) belonged to serovars Ia and E. For all isolates, the MIC range of doxycycline was 0.008 to 0.06 micrograms/ml, for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole it was 0.03 to 0.25 micrograms/ml, for azithromycin it was 0.125 to 2.0 micrograms/ml, for ofloxacin it was 0.5 to 1.0 micrograms/ml, for clindamycin it was 0.25 to 2.0 micrograms/ml, and for amoxicillin it was 0.25 to 4.0 microgram/ml. The ranges of minimum chlamydiacidal concentrations were generally 1 to 4 dilutions above the MICs of most agents, with a rank order similar to those of the MICs. Comparing the minimum chlamydiacidal concentrations for 90% of isolates tested, isolates causing asymptomatic infection belonged to a greater variety of serovars and were relatively more susceptible to doxycycline and azithromycin than isolates causing mucopurulent cervicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease; these differences in susceptibility were not detected among the other study agents. These data indicate that additional studies are needed to better define the apparent association of certain chlamydial serovars with the clinical severity of disease and the in vitro susceptibilities to certain antimicrobial agents.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (162.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bailey J. M., Heppleston C., Richmond S. J. Comparison of the in vitro activities of ofloxacin and tetracycline against Chlamydia trachomatis as assessed by indirect immunofluorescence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jul;26(1):13–16. doi: 10.1128/aac.26.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harrison H. R., Riggin R. M., Alexander E. R., Weinstein L. In vitro activity of clindamycin against strains of Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum isolated from pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jul 1;149(5):477–480. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90019-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johannisson G., Sernryd A., Lycke E. Susceptibility of Chlamydia trachomatis to antibiotics in vitro and in vivo. Sex Transm Dis. 1979 Apr-Jun;6(2):50–57. doi: 10.1097/00007435-197904000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson J. R., Stamm W. E. Urinary tract infections in women: diagnosis and treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Dec 1;111(11):906–917. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-11-906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuo C. C., Wang S. P., Grayston J. T. Antimicrobial activity of several antibiotics and a sulfonamide against Chlamydia trachomatis organisms in cell culture. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Jul;12(1):80–83. doi: 10.1128/aac.12.1.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mourad A., Sweet R. L., Sugg N., Schachter J. Relative resistance to erythromycin in Chlamydia trachomatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Nov;18(5):696–698. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.5.696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ridgway G. L., Owen J. M., Oriel J. D. A method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of Chlamydia trachomatis in a cell culture system. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1976 Mar;2(1):71–76. doi: 10.1093/jac/2.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Suchland R. J., Stamm W. E. Simplified microtiter cell culture method for rapid immunotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jul;29(7):1333–1338. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.7.1333-1338.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Welsh L. E., Gaydos C. A., Quinn T. C. In vitro evaluation of activities of azithromycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline against Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Feb;36(2):291–294. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.2.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES