Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
editorial
. 2006 Oct 28;333(7574):870–871. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38987.478727.80

Spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Is available, yet underused in general practice

Patrick J P Poels 1,2,3, Tjard R J Schermer 1,2,3, Chris van Weel 1,2,3, Peter M A Calverley 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1626302  PMID: 17068018

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease affects about 1% of the total UK population1 and is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. Timely diagnosis and subsequent staging of severity of disease both require spirometry, which in theory can be performed by trained general practitioners (GPs) and their practice staff.2,3 However, numerous barriers impede the implementation of spirometry in primary care.

Several guidelines exist for the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, including those from the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical excellence (NICE)4 and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD; www.goldcopd.com). All guidelines stress the central role of spirometry in diagnosing and managing the disease in primary care, but this does not guarantee that GPs will use this technique consistently in the care of patients with respiratory symptoms.5

Several models to provide spirometry test results exist, depending on local circumstances; these include regional primary care diagnostic services and hospital based lung function laboratories with open access for primary care patients.6 However, the most practical and timely solution is for GPs to have their own spirometer in the practice.7 In the United Kingdom about 80% of general practices own a spirometer,8 but these instruments are still scarce in large parts of the world, even though prices have dropped considerably in the past few years. Trained practice staff who have the skills and time to fit and maintain spirometry of sufficient quality into the daily practice routine9 may also be in short supply.10 In addition to the practical issues, GPs' lack of confidence in their ability to interpret the test results is a crucial barrier—often neglected in the guidelines to effective implementation of spirometry.8 Many GPs view spirometry as a complex diagnostic tool, like electrocardiography. This fact was clearly illustrated in a recent UK study that reported low levels of self confidence in interpreting spirometric tests in 160 general practices where GPs and nurses had been trained for half a day—only a third of these professionals trusted their own interpretative skills.8 Confidence about how to proceed once the test results are available is a crucial part of building GPs' confidence in their capacity to diagnose and manage the disease.

Ideally once GPs have had initial spirometry training they should receive continuous advice and support. This could be done in various ways—by another GP with a special interest in respiratory diseases in the same practice or in another practice nearby; by means of a computerised clinical decision support system (SpidaXpert software; www.spirxpert.com); or by consultation or feedback from a chest physician. Although intuitively a promising idea, empirical studies on the effects of ongoing expert support on the interpretative capacity and self confidence of GPs are lacking.

So what needs to happen next? For guidelines on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to be implemented, concrete working agreements between GPs and chest physicians need to be developed. Chest physicians can act as coaches for their local primary care colleagues in two ways—through patient oriented support (specific feedback for specific patients) or through practice oriented support (as teachers in postgraduate training programmes). This will be beneficial for both parties, as referrals will be more structured and based on agreed criteria, GPs who have performed spirometry will have better insight into the patient's lung function, and chest physicians will benefit from having the results at the initial consultation.11 More broadly, coordinated efforts by health policy makers and the medical profession will be needed to provide the right equipment, training for staff who use it, and continuing quality assurance and support for test interpretation. The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is sufficiently large to warrant such an approach.

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Soriano JB, Maier WC, Egger, Visick G, Thakrar B, Sykes J, et al. Recent trends in physician diagnosed COPD in women and men in the UK. Thorax 2000;55: 789-94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schermer TR, Jacobs JE, Chavannes NH, Hartman J, Folgering HT, Bottema BJ, et al. Validity of spirometric testing in a general practice population of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thorax 2003;58: 861-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chavannes N, Schermer T, Akkermans R, Jacobs JE, van de GG, Bollen R, et al. Impact of spirometry on GPs' diagnostic differentiation and decision-making. Respir Med 2004;98: 1124-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anonymous. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. National clinical guideline on management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults in primary and secondary care. Thorax 2004;59(suppl 1): i1-i232. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Decramer M, Bartsch P, Pauwels R, Yernault JC. Management of COPD according to guidelines. A national survey among Belgian physicians. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2003;59: 62-80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schermer T, Eaton T, Pauwels R, van Weel C. Spirometry in primary care: is it good enough to face demands like world COPD day? Eur Respir J 2003;22: 725-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.O'Dowd LC, Fife D, Tenhave T, Panettieri RA, Jr. Attitudes of physicians toward objective measures of airway function in asthma. Am J Med 2003;114: 391-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bolton CE, Ionescu AA, Edwards PH, Faulkner TA, Edwards SM, Shale DJ. Attaining a correct diagnosis of COPD in general practice. Respir Med 2005;99: 493-500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Eaton T, Withy S, Garrett JE, Mercer J, Whitlock RM, Rea HH. Spirometry in primary care practice: the importance of quality assurance and the impact of spirometry workshops. Chest 1999;116: 416-23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Poels PJ, Schermer TR, Jacobs A, Akkermans RP, Hartman J, Bottema BJ, et al. Variation in spirometry utilisation between trained general practitioners in practices equipped with a spirometer. Scand J Primary Health Care 2006;24: 81-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schermer T, Smeenk F, van Weel C. Referral and consultation in asthma and COPD: an exploration of pulmonologists' views. Neth J Med 2003;61: 71-81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES