Skip to main content
BMC Genomics logoLink to BMC Genomics
. 2006 Oct 19;7:263. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-263

Identification of novel regulators in T-cell differentiation of aplastic anemia patients

Anke Franzke 1,, Robert Geffers 2, J Katrin Hunger 1, Susanne Pförtner 2, Wenji Piao 1, Philipp Ivanyi 1, Jens Grosse 1, Michael Probst-Kepper 4, Arnold Ganser 1, Jan Buer 2,3
PMCID: PMC1626471  PMID: 17052335

Abstract

Background

Aplastic anemia (AA) is a bone marrow failure syndrome mostly characterized by an immune-mediated destruction of marrow hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells. The resulting hypocellularity limits a detailed analysis of the cellular immune response. To overcome this technical problem we performed a microarray analysis of CD3+ T-cells derived from bone marrow aspirates and peripheral blood samples of newly diagnosed AA patients and healthy volunteers. Two AA patients were additionally analyzed after achieving a partial remission following immunosuppression. The regulation of selected candidate genes was confirmed by real-time RT-PCR.

Results

Among more than 22.200 transcripts, 583 genes were differentially expressed in the bone marrow of AA patients compared to healthy controls. Dysregulated genes are involved in T-cell mediated cytotoxicity, immune response of Th1 differentiated T-cells, and major regulators of immune function. In hematological remission the expression levels of several candidate genes tend to normalize, such as immune regulators and genes involved in proinflammatory immune response.

Conclusion

Our study suggests a pivotal role of Th1/Tc1 differentiated T-cells in immune-mediated marrow destruction of AA patients. Most importantly, immune regulatory genes could be identified, which are likely involved in the recovery of hematopoiesis and may help to design new therapeutic strategies in bone marrow failure syndromes.

Background

Acquired aplastic anemia (AA) is a rare bone marrow failure state characterized by marrow hypocellularity and low peripheral blood cell counts [1]. Although the exact pathogenic mechanism is still unknown, beside a primary stem cell defect [2] and a disturbed microenvironment [3], pre-/clinical data suggest an immune-mediated destruction of marrow progenitor/stem cells [1,4]. Similar to other autoimmune diseases, antigen-specific T cells could be expanded from the bone marrow of AA patients and likely mediate organ-specific cytotoxicity to hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells [5]. In addition, it has been reported that the bone marrow of AA patients contains increased numbers of apoptotic cells [6] and that hematopoietic stem cells of AA patients express Fas antigen [7]. Peripheral blood and bone marrow T-cells show signs of activation [8], secrete high levels of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and tumor-necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). These two cytokines may suppress the proliferation of early and late hematopoietic progenitor cells and initiate apoptosis by induction of Fas on CD34+ stem cells [9,10]. Most recently, some groups reported a polarization of CD4+ T-cells towards a type-1 immune response that leads to activation of cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells with destruction of marrow stem cells [11]. However, genes important for the recruitment of effector T-cells to the bone marrow as target organ of autoimmunity and regulatory molecules directing their differentiation have not been identified so far. Therefore, we performed a microarray study comparing gene expression profiles of circulating and marrow-derived T-cells at initial presentation and after hematological recovery in order to elucidate more details of the mechanism resulting in severe bone marrow failure.

Results

Microarray analysis

Comparative gene expression profiling was performed in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients and healthy controls by analyzing pooled CD3+ T-cells isolated from peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples (Table 1). Each oligonucleotide microarray (Affymetrix HG_U133A) contained 22.218 human probesets and in our experiments discovered between 48.1% and 53.7% "present calls" as calculated by the statistical detection algorithm of Affymetrix. In general, "present calls" of approximately 50% provide confidential results. Scaled factors which were used to normalize the arrays to an average intensity ranged from 0.915 to 1.544 showing the high reproducibility of the experimental procedure. Furthermore, the hybridisation was monitored by the usage of hybridisation controls comparing total RNA amount and final signal intensity on the array (r > 0.99). Taken together, our data reached a highly acceptable quality level for further analysis.

Table 1.

Patients' characteristics.

patient age/sex diagnosis PNH-clone source of sample pre-therapy sample post-therapy sample pool
1 19/F SAA n PB
BM
y
y
n
n
I
I
2 57/M vSAA n PB
BM
y
y
n
n
I
I
3 40/F SAA n PB
BM
y
y
n
n
I
I
4 70/F SAA n PB
BM
y
y
n
n
I
I
5 64/M SAA n PB
BM
y
y
y
y
IIa/IIb
IIa/IIb
6 70/F vSAA n PB
BM
y
y
y
y
IIa/IIb
IIa/IIb

Abbreviations: F = female; M = male; (v)SAA = (very) severe aplastic anemia; n = no; y = yes; PB = peripheral blood; BM = bone marrow; I = pool I at initial presentation (n = 4); IIa = pool II at initial presentation (n = 2); IIb = pool II in hematological remission (n = 2). Disease classification was performed according to the International Study of Aplastic Anemia and Agranulocytosis [45].

To eliminate genes which may be individually regulated independent of disease we focused in our study only on genes coregulated in both of the analyzed SAA pools (pool I and IIa) in comparison to the normal controls (pool III), each separately for PB and BM samples. The potentially disease-specific (dys-)regulation comprised a wide variety of genes belonging to different functional classes, such as immune response, proliferation/cell growth, biosynthesis/metabolism, signal transduction and apoptosis (Figure 1). The most interesting genes are summarized below, whereas the entire data set is available at the GEO database [12] under the accession number GSE3807.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Results of differential transcriptome analysis in bone marrow-derived CD3+ T-cells of SAA patients. Genome-wide gene expression profiles of CD3+ T-cells derived from bone marrow aspirations of SAA patients and healthy volunteers were comparatively analyzed. The diagram summarizes the number of differentially expressed genes (> 2-fold) assigned to different functional classes.

Gene expression profiles of T-cells from SAA patients at initial diagnosis

The circulating T-cells isolated from the PB samples of SAA patients exhibited a broadly normal gene expression profile with dysregulation of only 42 genes (35 up- and 7 downregulated) in both of the analyzed SAA pools. In contrast, in comparison to the control pool T-cells isolated from BM aspirations showed a dysregulation of 583 genes (125 up- and 458 downregulated), which were coregulated in both SAA pools. Among the regulated genes identified in circulating T-cells some were also differentially expressed in BM-derived T-lymphocytes (i.e. IRS2, BASP1, EGR1, Lyn) and other molecules were only regulated in PB samples (i.e. IL6R, TNFAIP3, BCL3). Differentially expressed genes, which were exclusively found in BM-infiltrating T-cells, were classified into several functional categories (Figure 1). These genes included molecules involved in immune responses and their regulation with the following fold changes for SAA pool I and IIa, respectively: PF-4 (-157-fold; -188-fold), CD26 (+2.2-fold; +2.1-fold), Ncf-1 (-3.9-fold; -2.2-fold), CCR2 (+2.7-fold; +2.7-fold), CX3CR1 (+4.3-fold; +2.9-fold) and other chemokine receptors and ligands. Many cytokines/growth factors and their receptors, which play an important role in inflammation and endogenous response to infections, were found to be dysregulated like IL-1α (-25.9-fold; -40.3-fold), IRAK3 (-5.9; -88-fold), LTβ (+2.2-fold; +2.2-fold), Toll-like receptor 2 (-10.4-fold; -5.0-fold) and CIAS1 (-23.5-fold; -6.3-fold). Furthermore molecules important for the regulation of proliferation and cell cycling were dysregulated (i.e., SOCS2, JAG1, VEGF, SKIL). Finally, several transcription factors were found to be differentially expressed in SAA patients (i.e., STAT1, STAT5B and IRF2).

To obtain more information, we also set a minimum fold change of 1.5 revealing an upregulation of genes in BM-derived CD3+ T-cells from SAA patients playing an important role in the regulation of apoptosis, like TRADD (+1.8-fold; +1.8-fold), TRAF5 (+1.8-fold; +1.8-fold), perforin-1 (+2.2-fold; +1.7-fold), granzyme H (+2.9-fold; +1.8-fold) and granzyme B (+2.6-fold; +1.5-fold).

In order to examine whether the obtained differential gene expression profiles in the analyzed SAA patients simply reflect an over- or under-representation of T-cell subpopulations, the differential gene expression pattern identified in circulating T-cells of SAA patients (pool I and IIa of the PB) were compared with gene expression profiles of effector memory versus naive CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell populations generated from normal donors [13,14]. The comparative analysis of effector memory and naïve CD4+ (effector memory and naïve CD8+ T-cells, respectively) shows that 301 genes (n = 1360, respectively) are statistically singificantly regulated in one of the analyzed subpopulations (p < 0.05, student's t-test). Interestingly, only 5 (n = 8, respectively) of these genes exhibited a similar expression pattern in the circulating CD3+ T-cells of the SAA patient pools (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Gene expression profile analysis of normal T-cell subpopulations in comparison to differentially expressed genes in CD3+ T-cells of SAA patients. The gene expression data of effector memory T-cell populations were compared separately for each of 3 normal donors with the mean gene expression level of the respective naive T-cell populations [13, 14]. Significantly regulated genes (p < 0.05, student's t-test) were further analyzed in comparison to the differential gene expression pattern of SAA patients (pool I and pool IIa of the PB). Number of commonly and differentially expressed genes is shown for effector memory versus naïve CD4+ T-cells in comparison to circulating CD3+ T-cells of SAA patients (part A) and also for the respective CD8+ T-cell subpopulations (part B).

Gene expression profiles of CD3+ T-cells from AA patients in remission

Gene expression profiles (Figure 3) were performed of CD3+ T-cells isolated from PB and BM samples of 2 SAA patients after achieving a hematological remission following immunosuppressive therapy (pool IIb). Data were analyzed with statistical tools as described in the method part and directly compared to their respective gene expression profile at initial presentation (pool IIa). In order to provide a better overview, we performed a hierarchical cluster analysis including genes that tend to normalize with respect to the gene expression levels detected in the normal control pools (Figure 4a). In total, we identified 60 of 583 regulated genes in the BM samples of the analyzed SAA patients turning to nearly normal gene expression levels after successful immunotherapy. This category mainly included genes involved in the regulation of immune response like Ncf1. In the PB samples of the SAA pool only one of 42 regulated genes (MT1E) tended to expression levels close to the normal control pool, but its function in the immune system is unknown.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Gene expression profiles of bone marrow-derived CD3+ T-cells of SAA patients at initial presentation and after hematological recovery. Hierarchical clustering analysis of gene expression patterns in CD3+ T-cells of 2 independent SAA patient pools at initial presentation (I and IIa) and in hematological remission (pool IIb) following immunosuppressive therapy were performed with respect to the expression profile of pooled CD3+ T-cells from healthy volunteers.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Changed gene expression pattern following immunotherapy. Panel A: Hierarchical clustering analysis includes genes that tend to normalize after immunotherapy with respect to their gene expression levels detected in the normal control pools. In the SAA patient pool of bone-marrow derived T-cells 60 of 583 regulated genes turned to nearly normal gene expression levels after successful immunosuppression. Panel B: The comparison of the gene expression profiles from bone marrow-derived T-cells of the SAA pool before and after immunotherapy revealed several genes exhibiting a very high difference (> 4-fold) in their expression level.

Furthermore, the comparison of the gene expression profiles (pool IIa vs IIb) revealed a group of several genes with a very high difference (> 4-fold) in the expression level before and after successful immunotherapy (Figure 4b). Most of these genes are important during inflammation and regulation of immune response, such as platelet-factor 4 (PF4), proteoglycan 2 und 3 (PRG2, PRG3), IL-1α, IRAK3, osteopontin (SPP1), receptor for Fc fragment of IgE (FCER1A) or RNASE3. The fold changes of regulated candidate genes are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Regulation of selected genes expressed in BM-derived T-cells of SAA patients.

probeset ID Symbol name fold changes vs. control pool
pool I pool IIa pool IIb
207075_at CIAS1 cold autoinflammatory syndrome 1 - 23.49 - 6.29 - 2.12
210118_s_at IL-1 A interleukin-1, alpha - 25.90 - 40.28 - 3.49
220034_at IRAK3 interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 3 - 5.91 - 88.03 - 2.18
204961_s_at NCF1 neutrophil cytosolic factor 1 - 3.87 - 2.23 - 1.32
206390_x_at PF4 platelet factor 4 - 156.82 - 187.53 - 11.81
211743_s_at PRG2 proteoglycan 2 - 236.22 - 78.96 - 2.55
204924_at TLR2 toll-like receptor 2 - 10.43 - 5.04 - 2.22

Abbreviations: I = pool I at initial presentation (n = 4); IIa = pool II at initial presentation (n = 2); IIb = pool II in hematological remission (n = 2).

Validation of microarray data by real-time RT-PCR

To confirm the microarray results, quantitative real-time RT-PCR of selected candidate genes was performed using the original patient sample pools (pool I, IIa) and patient 6 in hematological remission. Because of limited amounts of pooled RNA, 4 genes were selected for quantification of gene expression using a new pool of normal BM samples. Even with this new sample pool the regulation of gene expression could be confirmed for the 4 analyzed genes (Figure 5). For example, separate microarray experiments revealed an increased expression for CD26 in pools I and IIa (2.17-fold; 2.07-fold), which could be confirmed by real-time RT-PCR (2.2-fold; 3.5-fold). In general, real-time RT-PCR results correlated well with the differential gene expression data of the microarray experiments.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Validation of microarray results by real-time PCR. Selected genes (CXCL4, PRG2, CD26, CX3CR1) with differential gene expression in the analyzed SAA and control pools were quantified by Taqman RT-PCR in 2 independent experiments. Relative mRNA expression levels were normalized with respect to RPS9 gene expression as internal control. Results are shown as mean fold-change value of the respective gene expression in the control pool. Slanted bars: Microarray result; black bar: respective real-time RT-PCR result. Panel A shows upregulated genes. Panel B demonstrates downregulated genes.

Discussion

In acquired aplastic anemia, the evidence of an autoimmune pathogenesis is mostly indirect and the characterization of the underlying immune response is incomplete mainly due to technical difficulties resulting from the disease-specific hypocellularity. However, there is growing evidence that AA results from autoaggressive destruction of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors mediated by T-cells recognizing inciting target antigens [1]. Several groups have identified clonal T-cell expansion [15-17], proinflammatory cytokine production [9] and T-cell mediated cytotoxicity to CD34+ stem cells [5,7] supporting an antigen-driven T-cell response. Most recently, we could characterize the antigen-binding sites of clonally expanded T-cells in SAA patients and identified the emergence of new T-cell clones after successful immunosuppression [18], suggesting a regulatory T-cell population contributing to the recovery of hematopoiesis. In this study, we applied microarray technology to characterize the immune response of the T-cell system in SAA. The design of our experiments differed from most recently reported transcript profiles of AA patients [19] in the following important issues: (a) The untreated patients included in this study were diagnosed as SAA with similar clinical characteristics, HLA background, response to therapy and without an expanded PNH clone. (b) Gene profiles of CD3+ T-cells from PB and BM samples of the same SAA patients and healthy controls were compared, as the pathological T-cell response is expected in the bone marrow as target organ of AA. (c) Furthermore, the gene profiles of SAA patients were comparatively analyzed with respect to normal gene expression before and after successful immunotherapy in order to identify candidate genes relevant for the recovery of hematopoiesis.

As expected the gene profiles of CD3+ T-cells isolated from PB samples differed significantly from the expression pattern found in BM-derived T-cells of SAA patients. The number of differentially expressed genes in circulating T-cells of SAA patients compared to healthy controls was surprisingly low: Only 42 genes were differentially expressed in peripheral T-cells of the patients pools. Interestingly among these genes, a negative regulator of cytokine response, the zinc finger protein TNFAIP3, was upregulated. The induction of TNFAIP3 may result from cellular counterregulation in response to high serum levels of TNF and IL-1 [20], as this molecule specifically inhibits the respective signal transduction pathways [21]. Two important multifunctional regulators of hematopoiesis, MIP1α [22] and Skil [23], were regulated in both peripheral and marrow-derived T-cells at initial diagnosis. Whereas MIP1α exerts potentially suppressive effects on the early myelopoiesis in AA [24,25], Skil functions as negative regulator of TGFβ signaling [25] and its induction may also represent a counterregulatory event.

In comparison to normal controls, marrow-derived CD3+ T-cells showed a large scale of differentially expressed genes indicating that T-cell dysregulation in the BM as target organ is a critical part of the pathological immune response. The regulation of 483 genes also demonstrates that the bone marrow failure results from a rather complex genetic program involving chemokines, cytokines, growth factors, and their receptors. We could identify the induction of several molecules playing key roles in the regulation of Th1 immune responses, such as CCR2 and CX3CR1 [26,27], which are also important in other autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis [28,29], and CD26, a surface-bound ectopeptidase expressed at high levels on Th1 differentiated T-cells [30,31]. The microarray study identified several genes like CD26, PF4 and Ncf1 with distinct immunregulatory functions. As these candidate genes were responding to successful immunotherapy, they might play a key role in the immunpathogenesis of AA and recovery of hematopoiesis after immunosuppression: Specific blocking of CD26, which was upregulated at initial diagnosis and normalized in hematological remission, suppresses the proliferation of autoreactive T-cells with upregulation of TGF-β1 and downregulation of TNF-α [32]; furthermore CD26 favors cytotoxic effector functions in CD8+ T-cells [33]. Specific binding of the chemokine PF4, which was initially enourmosly downregulated and almost normalized after immunotherapy, prevents the release of IL-2 and IFN-γ in activated T-cells and may especially suppress autoreactive T cells in the presence of proinflammatory cytokines [34]. Ncf1, a gene important for oxidative burst formation, regulates the severity of other autoimmune diseases and modulates (in-)directly the level of T-cell dependent autoimmune responses [35]. Taken together, these candidate genes might be highly relevant for the autoreactive T-cell attack in AA and the induction of peripheral tolerance with recovery of the hematopoiesis following immunotherapy.

In contrast to Zeng et al. [19] we could not identify an upregulation of several other chemokines/-receptors (i.e., CCL14, MIP2α, MIP3α, CXCL1 and CXCL12), which play a role in other autoimmune diseases. Also inconsistent with already reported transcript profiles [19] we identifed a downregulation of several molecules involved in innate immune responses, such as Toll-like receptor 2, IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK3), IL-1 and its receptor in our SAA patient pools. The dysregulation of innate immunity in SAA patients may result in increased proinflammatory cytokine production towards bacterial challenge as observed in IRAK3-/- mice [36]. In accordance to earlier reports [37,38] we could identify a downregulation of IL-1α/β in BM-derived T-cells at initial presentation with normalization of the expression level for IL-1α after hematological recovery. Interestingly, the administration of IL-1 accelerates hematopoietic reconstitution after chemotherapy induced myelosuppression in vivo [37] underlining its potential role in marrow failure syndromes. Additionally, the gene expression level of an important regulator of NFκB-dependent proinflammatory signals, CIAS1, was regulated enormously in the pre- and post-therapeutic SAA pools. Interestingly, mutations of CIAS1 cause several autoimmune inflammatory syndromes [39,40] and its downregulation in SAA patients may contribute to the immunpathology of AA by augmentation of proinflammatory signals. As weakly regulated molecules may also have important influence on disease development, we additionally analyzed the gene expression profiles for a minimum fold change of 1.5 and could reveal an upregulation of several genes related to cell-mediated cytotoxicity and apoptosis, such as perforin-1, granzyme H and B [41]. The involvement of cytotoxic granules in the induction of target cell apoptosis has already been shown in AA [42] and other autoimmune disorders [43]. Interestingly, TRAF and TRADD, two mediators of the TNFR familiy for cell activation, survival and antiapoptotic function [44] were upregulated in BM-derived T-cells and may be protective for the effector population in the presence of high TNFα levels.

Conclusion

In summary, our microarray study revealed a Th1/Tc1 phenotype in bone marrow-derived T-cells of SAA patients at initial presentation. Whereas the potential mechanism for the recruitment of effector T-cell to the bone marrow remained unclear, we could identify several regulators highly relevant for the immunpathogenesis of AA and likely contributing to the recovery of hematopoiesis. Especially the identified regulators of proinflammatory cytokine signaling (IRAK3, CIAS) and molecules with distinct immunregulatory properties in controlling autoreactive T-cells (CD26, PF4, Ncf1) may represent potential targets for the design of new therapeutic strategies.

Methods

Patients and controls

Six patients with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia (SAA) were included in the study after written informed consent to protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. Bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples were obtained before (n = 6) and after achieving a hematological remission (n = 2) following immunosuppressive therapy with antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporin A (Table 1). The diagnosis of SAA was established by PB counts and BM biopsy as recommended by the International Study of Aplastic Anemia and Agranulocytosis [45]; severitiy was classified according to the criteria of Camitta et al. [46]. Control samples from healthy volunteers were obtained after informed consent according to the institutional guidelines.

Isolation of CD3+ T cells, RNA preparation and sample pooling

Mononucleated cells of PB and BM were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque sedimentation (Biochrom AG, Berlin, Germany). CD3+ T-cells were positively selected using anti-CD3+ microbeads (Miltenyi-Biotec, Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purity of the isolated CD3+ T-cells was controlled by FACS analysis and was higher than 96% with comparable CD4+/CD8+ ratios. The residual contaminating cell populations varied in the isolations from the different donors and represented natural killer cells (1%–2%), dendritic cells (< 1%), B cells (< 1%), and monocytes (< 1%). Subsequently, total cellular RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). One μg of total RNA of each preparation, respectively, was pooled seperately for PB and BM as follows: Patients 1–4 prior to therapy (pool I), patients 5 and 6 prior to therapy (pool IIa), patients 5 and 6 after therapy in hematological remission (pool IIb) and healthy donors 1–3 (pool III).

Affymetrix GeneChip assay

Integrity and quality of total RNA isolated from CD3+ T-cells were checked using Agilent Technologies 2100 Bioanalyser (Agilent Technologies, Germany). To obtain biotinylated cRNA for hybridization a one-cycle target labeling assay was performed. Therefore double-stranded cDNA was synthesized from 2 or 4 μg of pooled total RNA (pools as described above) using T7-oligo(dT)-primers (Eurogentec, Belgium). After clean-up of the ds-cDNA an in vitro transcription assay was performed in the presence of biotinylated nucleotides. The amplified and biotinylated cRNA was cleaned up using RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and its yield was determined by spectrophotometric analysis. For each GeneChip to be analysed, 10 μg cRNA and additional biotinylated hybridization controls (BioB, BioC, BioD, and Cre) were fragmented and hybridized to an identical lot of HG_U133A GeneChip Arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) for 16 h at 45°C. Afterwards the GeneChips were washed and stained with PE-streptavidin in the Fluidic Station 400 and were read out in the Agilent GeneArray Scanner 2500. All reactions were performed using standard protocols and equipment supplied by the manufacturer.

Data analysis

Gene expression levels were determined using the Affymetrix Microarray Suite 5.0, MicroDB 3.0 and Affymetrix Data Mining Tool 3.0. For normalization, all array experiments were scaled to a target intensity of 150, otherwise using the default values of the Microarray suite as previously described [47]. Filtering of the results was performed as follows: Genes were considered to be regulated if their fold change was greater/less than or equal to 2. The statistical parameter for a significant change was less than 0.01 [p-value for changes called increased (I)] or greater than 0.99 [p-value for changes called decreased (D)]. In addition, the signal difference of the respective gene should be greater than 100.

Furthermore, microarray analyses were performed comparing the differential gene expression pattern of SAA patients (pool I and pool IIa of the PB) with profiles of naive and effector memory CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell populations generated from 3 different healthy donors, respectively. For this purpose data available at the EBI Array Express database [13,14] were normalized using the Affymetrix Microarray Suite 5.0 [47]. The normalized data were further analyzed using Affymetrix Assist comparing the expression data of the effector memory T-cell population separately for each donor with the mean gene expression level of the respective naive T-cell populations. Genes were considered to be regulated if their fold change was greater/less than or equal to 2. The statistical parameter for a significant change was p < 0.05 applying the student's t-test.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Real-time RT-PCR was performed to confirm expression levels of RNA transcripts in pool I, pool IIa, patient 6 after therapy in hematological remission and 2 additional healthy donors. cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using oligo-dT primers and M-MLV polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) following the manufacturer's recommendations. For relative quantification, RPS9 mRNA served as an external control. The reactions were performed by the ABI PRISM 7000 cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using SYBR Green PCR Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) with sequence-specific oligonucleotide primers. A threshold was set in the linear part of the amplification curve, and the number of cycles needed to reach it was calculated for every gene. This threshold cycle was used to quantify mRNA levels of the target genes in the analyzed samples with RPS9 normalization.

Authors' contributions

AF design of the study, patient sampling, data analysis, writing the ms

RG analysis of the gene expression arrays

JKH performing real-time RT-PCR, data analysis, preperation of tables/figures

SP performing gene expression arrays

WP sample preparation, T-cell isolation

PI data analysis

JG assisting in sample preparation

MPK data analysis

AG design of the study

JB providing array facility, data analysis

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Tanja Toepfer for excellent technical assistance.

Contributor Information

Anke Franzke, Email: franzke.anke@mh-hannover.de.

Robert Geffers, Email: rog@gbf.de.

J Katrin Hunger, Email: katrin.hunger@gmx.de.

Susanne Pförtner, Email: spf@gbf.de.

Wenji Piao, Email: piao.wenji@mh-hannover.de.

Philipp Ivanyi, Email: p.ivanyi@gmx.de.

Jens Grosse, Email: grosse.jens@mh-hannover.de.

Michael Probst-Kepper, Email: mpk@gbf.de.

Arnold Ganser, Email: ganser.arnold@mh-hannover.de.

Jan Buer, Email: jab@gbf.de.

References

  1. Young NS, Maciejewski JP. The pathophysiology of aquired aplastic anemia. N Eng J Med. 1997;336:1365–1372. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199705083361906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Marsh JC, Chang J, Testa NG, Hows JM, Dexter TM. The hematopoietic defect in aplastic anemia assessed by long-term marrow culture. Blood. 1990;76:1748–1757. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gordon MY. Stem cells and the microenvironment in aplastic anaemia. Br J Haematol. 1994;86:190–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1994.tb03274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frickhofen N, Kaltwasser JP, Schrezenmeier H, Ragavachar A, Vogt HG, Herrmann F, Freund M, Meusers P, Salama A, Heimpel H. Treatment of aplastic anemia with antilymphocyte globulin and methylprednisolone with or without cyclosporine. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1297–1304. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105093241901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nakao S, Takami A, Takamatsu H, Zeng W, Sugimori N, Yamazaki H, Miura Y, Ueda M, Shiobara S, Yoshioka T, Kaneshige T, Yasukawa M, Matsuda T. Isolation of a T cell clone showing HLA-DRB1*0405-restricted cytotoxicity for hematopoietic cells in a patient with aplastic anemia. Blood. 1997;89:3691–3699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Philpot NJ, Scopes J, Marsh JCW, Gordon Smith EC, Gibson FM. Increased apoptosis in aplastic anemia bone marrow progenitor cells: Possible pathophysiologic significance. Exp Hematol. 1995;23:1642–1648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maciejewski JP, Selleri C, Sato T, Anderson S, Young NS. Increased expression of Fas antigen on bone marrow CD34+ cells of patients with aplastic anemia. Br J Haematol. 1995;91:245–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1995.tb05277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Maciejewski JP, Hibbs JR, Anderson S, Katevas P, Young NS. Bone marrow and peripheral blood lymphocyte phenotype in patients with bone marrow failure. Exp Hematol. 1994;22:1102–1110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maciejewski JP, Selleri C, Anderson S, Young NS. Fas antigen expression on CD34+ human marrow cells is induced by interferon gamma and tumor necrosis factor alpha and potentiates cytokine mediated hematopoietic suppression in vitro. Blood. 1995;85:3183–3190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nagafuji K, Shibuya T, Harada M, Mizuno S, Takenaka K, Miyamoto T, Okamura T, Gondo H, Niho Y. Functional expression of Fas antigen (CD95) on hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood. 1995;86:883–889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Giannakoulas NC, Karakantza M, Theodorou GL, Pagoni M, Galanopoulos A, Kakagianni T, Kouraklis-Symeonidis A, Matsouka P, Maniatis A, Zoumbos NC. Clinical relevance of balance between type 1 and type 2 immune responses of lymphocyte subpopulations in aplastic anemia patients. Br J Haematol. 2004;124:97–105. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04729.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ accession number GSE3807.
  13. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress accession number E-MEXP-750.
  14. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress accession number E-TABM-40.
  15. Zeng W, Nakao S, Takamatsu H, Yachie A, Takami A, Kondo Y, Sugimori N, Yamazaki H, Miura Y, Shiobara S, Matsuda T. Characterization of T-cell repertoire of the bone marrow in immune-mediated aplastic anemia: Evidence for the involvement of antigen-driven T-cell response in cyclosporine-dependent aplastic anemia. Blood. 1999;93:3008–3016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zeng W, Maciejewski JP, Chen G, Young NS. Limited heterogeneity of T cell receptor BV usage in aplastic anemia. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:765–773. doi: 10.1172/JCI200112687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Risitano AM, Kook H, Zeng W, Chen G, Young NS, Maciejewski JP. Oligoclonal and polyclonal CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes in aplastic anemia and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria measured by V beta CDR3 spectratyping and flow cytometry. Blood. 2002;100:178–183. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Piao W, Grosse J, Czwalinna A, Ivanyi P, Ganser A, Franzke A. Antigen-recognition sites of micromanipulated T cells in patients with acquired aplastic anemia. Exp Hematol. 2005;33:804–810. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2005.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zeng W, Kajigaya S, Chen G, Risitano AM, Nunez O, Young NS. Transcript profile of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from the bone marrow of acquired aplastic anemia patients. Exp Hematol. 2004;32:806–814. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jattela M, Mouritzen H, Elling F, Bastholm L. A20 zinc finger protein inhibits TNF and IL-1 signaling. J Immunol. 1996;156:1166–1173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grey ST, Arvelo MB, Hasenkamp W, Bach FH, Ferran C. A20 inhibits cytokine-induced apoptosis and nuclear factor kappaB-dependent gene activation in islets. J Exp Med. 1999;190:1135–1146. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.8.1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Avalos BR, Bartynski KJ, Elder PJ, Kotur MS, Burton WG, Wilkie NM. The active monomeric form of macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha interacts with high- and low-affinity classes of receptors on human hematopoietic cells. Blood. 1994;84:1790–1801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hsu HC, Tsai WH, Chen LY, Hsu ML, Ing-Tiau Kuo B, Ho CH, Lin CK, Wang SY. Production of hematopoietic regulatory cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with aplastic anemia. Exp Hematol. 1996;24:31–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Broxmeyer HE, Cooper S, Hangoc G, Gao JL, Murphy PM. Dominant myelopoietic effector functions mediated by chemokine receptor CCR1. J Exp Med. 1999;189:1987–1992. doi: 10.1084/jem.189.12.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stroschein SL, Wang W, Zhou S, Zhou Q, Luo K. Negative feedback regulation of TGF-beta signaling by the SnoN oncoprotein. Science. 1999;286:771–774. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5440.771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Charo IF, Peters W. Chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) in atherosclerosis, infectious diseases, and regulation of T-cell polarization. Microcirculation. 2003;10:259–264. doi: 10.1038/sj.mn.7800191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fraticelli P, Sironi M, Bianchi G, D'Ambrosio D, Albanesi C, Stoppacciaro A, Chieppa M, Allavena P, Ruco L, Girolomoni G, Sinigaglia F, Vecchi A, Mantovani A. Fractalkine (CX3CL1) as an amplification circuits of polarized Th1 resonses. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:1173–1181. doi: 10.1172/JCI11517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lock C, Hermans G, Pedotti R, Brendolan A, Schadt E, Garren H, Langer-Gould A, Strober S, Cannella B, Allard J, Klonowski P, Austin A, Lad N, Kaminski N, Galli SJ, Oksenberg JR, Raine CS, Heller R, Steinman L. Gene-microarray analysis of multiple sclerosis lesions yields new targets validated in autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat Med. 2002;8:500–508. doi: 10.1038/nm0502-500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jee Y, Yoon WK, Okura Y, Tanuma N, Matsumoto Y. Upregulation of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and CC chemokine receptor 2 in the central nervous system is closely associated with relapse of autoimmune encephalomyelitis in Lewis rats. J Neuroimmunol. 2002;128:49–57. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(02)00147-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dang NH, Morimoto C. CD26: An expanding role in immune regulation and cancer. Histol Histopathol. 2002;17:1213–1226. doi: 10.14670/HH-17.1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Willheim M, Ebner C, Baier K, Kern W, Schrattbauer K, Thien R, Kraft D, Breiteneder H, Reinisch W, Scheiner O. Cell surface characterization of T lymphocytes and allergen-specific T cell clones – correlation of CD26 expression with Th1 subsets. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;100:348–255. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(97)70248-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Steinbrecher A, Reinhold D, Quigley L, Gado A, Tresser N, Izikson L, Born I, Faust J, Neubert K, Martin R, Ansorge S, Brocke S. Targeting dipeptidyl peptidase (CD26) suppresses autoimmune encephalomyelitis and up-regulates TGF-beta1 secretion in vivo. J Immunol. 2001;166:2041–2048. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.3.2041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fleischer B, Sturm E, De-Vries JE, Spits H. Triggering of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and NK cells via the Tp103 pathway is dependent on the expression of the T cell receptor/CD3 complex. J Immunol. 1988;141:1103–1107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fleischer J, Grage-Griebenow E, Kasper B, Heine H, Ernst M, Brandt E, Flad HD, Petersen F. Platelet factor 4 inhibits proliferation and cytokine release of activated human T cells. J Immunol. 2002;169:770–777. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.2.770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hultqvist M, Olofsson P, Holmberg J, Backstrom BT, Tordsson J, Holmdahl R. Enhanced autoimmunity, arthritis and encephalomyelitis in mice with a reduced oxidative burst due to a mutation in the Ncf1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:12646–12651. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403831101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kobayashi K, Hernandez LD, Galan JE, Janeway CA, Medzhitov R, Flavell RA. IRAK-M is a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signalling. Cell. 2002;101:191–202. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00827-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fibbe WE, Willemze R. The role of interleukin-1 in hematopoiesis. Acta Haematol. 1991;86:148–154. doi: 10.1159/000204824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nakao S, Matsushima K, Young N. Decreased interleukin-1 production in aplastic anemia. Br J Haematol. 1989;71:431–436. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1989.tb04302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Anderson JP, Mueller JL, Rosengren S, Boyle DL, Schaner P, Cannon SB, Goodyear CS, Hoffman HM. Structural, expression and evolutionary analysis of mouse CIAS1. Gene. 2004;338:25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Porksen G, Lohse P, Rosen-Wolff A, Heyden S, Forster T, Wendisch J, Heubner G, Bernuth H, Sallmann S, Gahr M, Roesler J. Periodic fever, mild arthralgias, and reversible moderate and severe organ inflammation associated with the V198M mutation in the CIAS1 gene in three German patients – expanding phenotype of CIAS1 related autoinflammatory syndrome. Eur J Haematol. 2004;73:123–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2004.00270.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Chinnaiyan AM, Hanna WL, Orth K, Duan H, Poirier GG, Froelich CJ, Dixit VM. Cytotoxic T-cell-derived granzyme B activates the apoptotic protease ICE-LAP3. Curr Biol. 1996;6:897–899. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00614-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Xu JL, Nagasaka T, Nakashima N. Involvement of cytotoxic granules in the apoptosis of aplastic anaemia. Br J Haematol. 2003;20:850–852. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gulan G, Ravlic-Gulan J, Strbo N, Sotosek V, Nemec B, Matovinovic D, Rubinic D, Podack ER, Rukavina D. Systemic and local expression of perforin in lymphocyte subsets in acute and chronic rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:660–670. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Park YC, Ye H, Hsia C, Segal D, Rich RL, Liou HC, Myszka DG, Wu H. A novel mechanism of TRAF signaling revealed by structural and functional analyses of the TRADD-TRAF2 interaction. Cell. 2000;101:777–787. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80889-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kaufman DW, Kelly J, Levy M, Shapiro S. Drugs in the aetiology of agranulocytosis and aplastic anaemia. Eur J Haematol. 1996;60:23–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1996.tb01641.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Camitta BM, Thomas ED, Nathan DG, Gale RP, Kopecky KJ, Rappeport JM, Santos G, Gordon-Smith EC, Storb R. A prospective study of androgens and bone marrow transplantation for treatment of severe aplastic anemia. Blood. 1979;53:504–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Bruder D, Probst-Kepper M, Westendorf AM, Geffers R, Beissert S, Loser K, von Boehmer H, Buer J, Hansen W. Neuropilin-1: A surface marker of regulatory T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34:623–630. doi: 10.1002/eji.200324799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Genomics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES