Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1995 Jun;39(6):1247–1252. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.6.1247

Clinical pharmacokinetics of cidofovir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

K C Cundy 1, B G Petty 1, J Flaherty 1, P E Fisher 1, M A Polis 1, M Wachsman 1, P S Lietman 1, J P Lalezari 1, M J Hitchcock 1, H S Jaffe 1
PMCID: PMC162721  PMID: 7574510

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of cidofovir (HPMPC; (S)-1-[3-hydroxy-2-(phosphonylmethoxy)propyl]cytosine) were examined at five dose levels in three phase I/II studies in a total of 42 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients (with or without asymptomatic cytomegalovirus infection). Levels of cidofovir in serum following intravenous infusion were dose proportional over the dose range of 1.0 to 10.0 mg/kg of body weight and declined biexponentially with an overall mean +/- standard deviation terminal half-life of 2.6 +/- 1.2 h (n = 25). Approximately 90% of the intravenous dose was recovered unchanged in the urine in 24 h. The overall mean +/- standard deviation total clearance of the drug from serum (148 +/- 25 ml/h/kg; n = 25) approximated renal clearance (129 +/- 42 ml/h/kg; n = 25), which was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the baseline creatinine clearance in the same patients (83 +/- 21 ml/h/kg; n = 12). These data indicate that active tubular secretion played a significant role in the clearance of cidofovir. The steady-state volume of distribution of cidofovir was approximately 500 ml/kg, suggesting that the drug was distributed in total body water. Repeated dosing with cidofovir at 3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg/week did not alter the pharmacokinetics of the drug. Concomitant administration of intravenous cidofovir and oral probenecid to hydrated patients had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of cidofovir at a 3.0-mg/kg dose. At higher cidofovir doses, probenecid appeared to block tubular secretion of cidofovir and reduce its renal clearance to a level approaching glomerular filtration.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (276.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bronson J. J., Ho H. T., De Boeck H., Woods K., Ghazzouli I., Martin J. C., Hitchcock M. J. Biochemical pharmacology of acyclic nucleotide analogues. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;616:398–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb17859.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cunningham R. F., Israili Z. H., Dayton P. G. Clinical pharmacokinetics of probenecid. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1981 Mar-Apr;6(2):135–151. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198106020-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Drew W. L., Miner R., Saleh E. Antiviral susceptibility testing of cytomegalovirus: criteria for detecting resistance to antivirals. Clin Diagn Virol. 1993 Aug;1(3):179–185. doi: 10.1016/0928-0197(93)90012-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dudley M. N., Graham K. K., Kaul S., Geletko S., Dunkle L., Browne M., Mayer K. Pharmacokinetics of stavudine in patients with AIDS or AIDS-related complex. J Infect Dis. 1992 Sep;166(3):480–485. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.3.480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Knupp C. A., Stancato F. A., Papp E. A., Barbhaiya R. H. Quantitation of didanosine in human plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr. 1990 Nov 30;533:282–290. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)82215-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nadai M., Apichartpichean R., Hasegawa T., Nabeshima T. Pharmacokinetics and the effect of probenecid on the renal excretion mechanism of diprophylline. J Pharm Sci. 1992 Oct;81(10):1024–1027. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600811014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES