Skip to main content
PMC home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1996 Jan;40(1):35–39. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.1.35

Influence of pH on adaptive resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides and their postantibiotic effects.

Y Q Xiong 1, J Caillon 1, H Drugeon 1, G Potel 1, D Baron 1
PMCID: PMC163052  PMID: 8787875

Abstract

Adaptive resistance to aminoglycosides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other gram-negative bacilli is usually induced by the initial exposure to the drug. We investigated the influence of pH on the adaptive resistance of a clinical P. aeruginosa strain to aminoglycosides in vitro and on their postantibiotic effects. For adaptive resistance, the first-exposure concentrations of both amikacin and netilmicin were one, two, four, and eight times the MIC of each drug and the second-exposure concentrations were two times the MIC of each drug. Adaptive resistance was greater and more prolonged with higher initial aminoglycoside concentrations, and the bactericidal effects of the aminoglycosides were concentration dependent at pH 7.4. At pH 6.5, the killing rates of amikacin and netilmicin were far lower than those observed at pH 7.4. At pH 5.5, amikacin and netilmicin exerted practically no bactericidal effect on the P. aeruginosa strain used. However, with media at pH 5.5 and 6.5, adaptive resistance of P. aeruginosa preexposed to amikacin and netilmicin was also clearly exhibited, with the degree of adaptive resistance depending on the bactericidal effects of both drugs on nonpreexposed controls. Maximal adaptive resistance occurred between 0 and 4 h after preexposure. The postantibiotic effects of amikacin and netilmicin against the P. aeruginosa strain were shown to be concentration dependent and were reduced at acidic pHs. No changes in outer and inner membrane proteins occurred during the adaptive-resistance interval.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (529.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barclay M. L., Begg E. J., Chambers S. T. Adaptive resistance following single doses of gentamicin in a dynamic in vitro model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Sep;36(9):1951–1957. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.9.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryan L. E., Kwan S. Roles of ribosomal binding, membrane potential, and electron transport in bacterial uptake of streptomycin and gentamicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983 Jun;23(6):835–845. doi: 10.1128/aac.23.6.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Daikos G. L., Jackson G. G., Lolans V. T., Livermore D. M. Adaptive resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics from first-exposure down-regulation. J Infect Dis. 1990 Aug;162(2):414–420. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.2.414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daikos G. L., Lolans V. T., Jackson G. G. First-exposure adaptive resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics in vivo with meaning for optimal clinical use. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Jan;35(1):117–123. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Damper P. D., Epstein W. Role of the membrane potential in bacterial resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Dec;20(6):803–808. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.6.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisenberg E. S., Mandel L. J., Kaback H. R., Miller M. H. Quantitative association between electrical potential across the cytoplasmic membrane and early gentamicin uptake and killing in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1984 Mar;157(3):863–867. doi: 10.1128/jb.157.3.863-867.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fraimow H. S., Greenman J. B., Leviton I. M., Dougherty T. J., Miller M. H. Tobramycin uptake in Escherichia coli is driven by either electrical potential or ATP. J Bacteriol. 1991 May;173(9):2800–2808. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.9.2800-2808.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hancock R. E., Carey A. M. Outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: heat- 2-mercaptoethanol-modifiable proteins. J Bacteriol. 1979 Dec;140(3):902–910. doi: 10.1128/jb.140.3.902-910.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leviton I. M., Fraimow H. S., Carrasco N., Dougherty T. J., Miller M. H. Tobramycin uptake in Escherichia coli membrane vesicles. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Feb;39(2):467–475. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.2.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mates S. M., Eisenberg E. S., Mandel L. J., Patel L., Kaback H. R., Miller M. H. Membrane potential and gentamicin uptake in Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Nov;79(21):6693–6697. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.21.6693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Taber H. W., Mueller J. P., Miller P. F., Arrow A. S. Bacterial uptake of aminoglycoside antibiotics. Microbiol Rev. 1987 Dec;51(4):439–457. doi: 10.1128/mr.51.4.439-457.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tuomanen E., Schwartz J. Penicillin-binding protein 7 and its relationship to lysis of nongrowing Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1987 Nov;169(11):4912–4915. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.11.4912-4915.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES