Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cancer Ther. 2006 Jan;5(1):29–38. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0126

INHIBITION OF TRIP1/S8/hSUG1, A COMPONENT OF THE HUMAN 19S PROTEASOME, ENHANCES MITOTIC APOPTOSIS INDUCED BY SPINDLE POISONS

Hiroshi Y Yamada 1,, Gary J Gorbsky 1
PMCID: PMC1630635  NIHMSID: NIHMS12944  PMID: 16432160

Abstract

Mitotic spindle poisons (e.g. Taxol, vinblastine), used as chemotherapy drugs, inhibit mitotic spindle function, activate the mitotic spindle checkpoint, arrest cells in mitosis, and then cause cell death by mechanisms that are poorly understood. By expression cloning we identified a truncated version of human TRIP1 (also known as S8, hSug1), an AAA (ATPases Associated with diverse cellular Activities) family ATPase subunit of the 19S proteasome regulatory complex, as an enhancer of spindle poison-mediated apoptosis. Stable expression of the truncated TRIP1/S8/hSug1 in HeLa cells (OP-TRIP1(88-406)) resulted in a decrease of measurable cellular proteasome activity, indicating that OP-had a dominant-negative effect on proteasome function. OP-TRIP1(88-406) revealed an increased apoptotic response after treatment with spindle poisons or with proteasome inhibitors. The increased apoptosis coincided with a significant decrease in expression of BubR1, a kinase required for activation and maintenance of the mitotic spindle checkpoint in response to treatment with spindle poisons. SiRNA-mediated knockdown of TRIP1/S8/hSug1 resulted in a reduction of general proteasome activity, and an increase in mitotic index. The siRNA treatment also caused increased cell death after spindle poison treatment. These results indicate that inhibition of TRIP1/S8/hSug1 function by expression of a truncated version of the protein or by siRNA-mediated suppression enhances cell death in response to spindle poison treatment. Current proteasome inhibitor drugs in trial as anticancer agents target elements of the 20S catalytic subcomplex. Our results suggest that targeting the ATPase subunits in 19S regulatory complex in the proteasome may enhance the anti-tumor effects of spindle poisons.

Keywords: spindle, microtubule, proteasome, TRIP1/Sug1, Taxol

Introduction

Spindle poisons (e.g. Taxol, vinblastine) are commonly used chemotherapy drugs (1, 2, 3). In clinically relevant doses (e.g. 5-200nM in Taxol (4)), they inhibit mitotic spindle function and activate the mitotic spindle checkpoint (5, 6, 7). The spindle checkpoint causes extended mitotic arrest through inhibition of a ubiquitin ligase complex called the Anaphase Promoting Complex or Cyclosome (APC/C) and its activator Cdc20. In some cases mitotic arrest results in cell death initiated during mitosis (mitotic apoptosis) or apoptosis observed after the cells exit mitosis abnormally without normal chromosome segregation (sometimes called adaptation or mitotic slippage) (4). The signal transduction pathways by which spindle poisons and other mitotic inhibitors lead to cell death remain to be clarified (8). A few molecules have been identified to affect spindle poison-mediated cell killing. Mitotic apoptosis is observed upon down regulation of certain kinetochore components such as Ndc80/Hec1 or Nuf2 by siRNA or conditional promoter shutoff (9, 10). Taxol treatment activates p38 MAP Kinase, and suppression of p38 by specific inhibitors suppresses Taxol-mediated cell death (11, 12). Spindle checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 kinases, if overexpressed, stimulate the apoptotic response (13). The hBubR1 protein is reduced during extended spindle poison-mediated mitotic arrest, at least in part due to a proteasome-dependent degradation, and this reduction has been proposed to be part of the link between the spindle checkpoint and induction of apoptosis (13). Postmitotic apoptosis is observed if the spindle checkpoint is compromised by repression of Mad2 or BubR1 with siRNA (14, 15), or expression of a dominant-negative form of the Cdc20 protein (16). Breast cancer cell lines SkBr3 and HCC-1433, and ovarian cancer cell lines A2780 and OVCAR have weakened spindle checkpoint function due to decreased expression of BubR1 and show elevated sensitivity to spindle poisons (17).

The proteasome, a large protease complex that degrades polyubiquitylated cellular proteins, has recently gained prominence as a potential target for cancer therapy (18-21). Proteasome inhibitors (e.g. Bortezomib/Velcade, Lactacystin, MG132 (18-21)) are cytotoxic but the precise mechanism of cell killing remains unclear. Bortezomib/Velcade has shown promise for a variety of cancers including multiple myeloma (19). Regulation of proteolysis is crucial in cellular growth control for normal cells. Inappropriate accumulation or reduction of cell cycle regulators have been linked to oncogenesis (22), and regulated proteolysis plays a major role in maintaining normal levels of proteins. A large percentage of regulated proteolysis is carried out by ubiquitin-mediated targeting (23-26). The ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis system requires a set of enzymes; an ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), several ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2) and a large variety of ubiquitin ligases (E3). These enzymes covalently attach multiple copies of the ubiquitin to the target. The resulting polyubiquitin chain on the target is recognized by the 26S proteasome. The 26S proteasome is a complex of two subcomplexes; a 19S regulatory complex and a 20S catalytic complex. Structural studies show that the barrel-shaped 20S catalytic complex is capped by the 19S regulatory complex(es) at one or both ends to form the 26S complex (18, 27). The 19S complex is believed to bind to, refold and transfer the polyubiquitylated target protein into central cavity of the 20S catalytic core, where the target protein is degraded by the protease activity. Consistent with the chaperone-like activity required, the 19S regulatory complex contains six ATPase subunits. In yeast, conditional mutants in different proteasome subunits show a mitotic arrest phenotype (28). This implies that the proteasome acts as whole and each component is required for activity. It also suggests that mitosis is a particularly sensitive target when proteasome activity is compromised.

We set out to identify factors affecting spindle poison-mediated cell killing, and developed a mammalian gene cloning protocol. One of the candidate plasmids, pSC3, encodes a portion of TRIP1/S8/hSug1, an ATPase subunit of the 19S proteasome. When stably integrated, expression of the truncated TRIP1/S8 showed no effect on normal cell growth but enhanced spindle poison-mediated cell death. Similarly repression of endogenous TRIP1/S8 by siRNA also results in increased cell death in response to spindle poisons. Thus TRIP1/S8 appears promising target to enhance spindle poison-mediated cell killing and may define an additional class of targets to inhibit proteasome function.

Materials and Methods

Expression Cloning Screen

We transfected COS7 cells (in two 15cm plates, approximately 70% confluent) with a human testis cDNA library (ClonTech, Palo Alto, CA). Twenty-four hours later, the cells were extensively washed to remove untransfected DNA and dead cells, and treated with nocodazole (100ng/ml). Rounded mitotic cells were shaken from the plate and collected every hour, up to hour 14, and transferred to new plates containing nocodazole (100ng/ml). At 16 hours after the beginning of nocodazole treatment, the new plates were rinsed with PBS to remove any still rounded mitotic cells, and the cells that had altered their morphology and became attached in the presence of nocodazole were retained. DNA from the attached cells was recovered with DNAzol reagent, used according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). To avoid integration of the plasmids into the COS7 cell genome, we collected plasmid DNA no longer than 40 hours after transfection. Recovered DNA was transformed into UltraMax DH5 competent bacteria (Invitrogen). Plasmid recovered from the bacteria was used for an additional round of transfection of COS7 cells to enrich plasmids with positive activity. After the second round we isolated individual plasmids from bacterial colonies and sequenced them.

Cell culture and microscopic analysis

We cultured and prepared cells as previously described (29). The fixed samples were analyzed with a ZEISS Axioplan IIi microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu Orca II camera and Metamorph Imaging system (Universal Imaging Corp. Downingtown, PA). For live cell observation, a planapochromat 60× (N.A. 1.4) objective (Nikon USA, Melville, NY) was used with a SenSys CCD camera (Photometrics Ltd. Tucson, AZ) connected to a Nikon Diaphot microscope and imaged with Metamorph software. We used Annexin V FLUOS (Roche biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) to stain phosphatidylserine exposed on the cell surface to identify apoptotic cells, following the manufacturer's instructions. Propidium iodide-positive (necrotic) cells were not scored as apoptotic. We also used LIVE/DEAD cell death assay kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) to assess cell death using different markers.

Stable cell line generation

The plasmid vector for the cDNA library, pEXP1 (ClonTech), contains the CMV promoter upstream of the cloning site for the library cDNA and an internal ribosome entry site that permits the co-translation of a puromycin-resistance gene. Thus if integrants are established, nearly all puromycin positive cells will stably express the gene of interest. We transfected HeLa cells with individual candidate plasmids and selected cells with puromycin (0.2-0.5μg/ml) for two to three weeks. For each plasmid some 200-500 surviving colonies were pooled and used for experiments to avoid clonal variation in expression of the integrant and to avoid indirect effects of stable cell generation such as mutations within the parental genome induced by integration of the plasmid. For full length TRIP1/S8 integrant generation, we used pCMS-EGFP vector (ClonTech) and G418 (250μg/ml) for selection.

FACS analysis for PARP positive cells

We treated control HeLa cells and OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells with nocodazole (100ng/ml) for 0, 16 or 24 hours. We suspended the cells by typsinization and fixed them with 80% ethanol (−20°C) for at least 2 hours. The permeabilized cells were rehydrated for 5-10 minutes and resuspended in PBS, blocked with 20% boiled normal goat serum in PBS, and incubated with rabbit anti- p85 PARP fragment antibody (1:200)(Promega, Madison, WI) in 5% goat serum for 1.5-3 hours. After being rinsed with PBS twice, samples were incubated with secondary antibody (FITC anti-rabbit, 1:400) for at least 1 hour. Samples were then rinsed and treated with RNase (0.1mg/ml), propidium iodide (50μg/ml) and 0.1% TritonX-100 at room temperature for at least three hours. The samples were analyzed with a FACScalibur flow cytometers, and the cell cycle profile was estimated by ModFit software with the aid of The Flow and Image Cytometry Laboratory (University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center).

Drug sensitivity (colony formation) assay

We plated approximately 500 cells in 12-well plates, 1000 cells in 60mm plates or 3000cells in 10cm plates. The next day (day zero) we added drugs in different concentrations and incubated the plates at 37°C. On day four, half of the medium was replaced and fresh drugs were added. The cells were fixed and stained on day eight with 0.5% methylene blue in 50% ethanol for 20 minutes, rinsed with distilled water, and dried (30). Assays were repeated at least three times and typical results are shown as pictures. Cell proliferation was quantified by imaging plates then summing the intensities of stained colonies using Metamorph software.

Proteasome activity assay

Sample cells were directly extracted, or harvested and frozen at −80°C until use. Extracts were prepared by vortexing cells in low salt buffer (20mM Tris-Cl pH7.0, 5mM ATP, 1mM DTT, 0.1mM EDTA, 20% glycerol, supplemented with 400nM microcystin LR and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis, MO)) and cleared by centrifugation at 15000g for 15 min at 4°C. The sample protein concentration was adjusted to 150μg/ml. Samples were incubated at 37°C for 30 or 60 minutes with the fluorogenic proteasome substrate III, SucLLVY-AMC (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) at 250nM. Reactions were terminated by the addition of 100μl of ethanol to 50μl of the reaction mixture. Fluorescence was measured in a 96 well plate with a plate reader (Tecan, Maennedorf, Switzerland) (Excitation 360nm; emission 465nm). Samples added MG132 (10 μM) were used for negative controls.

SiRNA-mediated protein knockdown

We used chemically modified siRNA duplex (Stealth siRNA, Invitrogen) to knockdown human TRIP1/S8, targeting 5'-GCTCATCATACGGACTGTACCTTTA-3'. As a negative control, siRNA for GFP (Green Fluorescent Protein) was used. Transfection was performed with Oligofectamine reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions.

Immunoblotting

Cells were extracted in either RIPA buffer (1% (w/w) Nonidet P-40, 1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 10mM sodium phosphate (pH7.2), 2mM EDTA, 150mM sodium chloride, 50mM sodium fluoride, 0.2mM sodium vanadate) supplemented with 10μM MG132, 5μg/ml protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma) and 400nM Microcystin LR, or in NP40 lysis buffer (50mM Tris-Cl (pH7.4), 1%(w/w) Nonidet P-40, 250mM sodium chloride, 10mM sodium fluoride, 5mM EDTA), supplemented with 10μM MG132, 5μg/ml protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma) and 400nM Microcystin LR, and boiled with SDS loading buffer for 6 minutes. Protein concentration was measured with the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce) and protein amounts loaded on the gels were equalized. We used rabbit anti-BubR1 (gift from Dr. T. Stukenberg; University of Virginia, VA), mouse anti-Cyclin B (BD Transduction laboratories, San Jose, CA), rabbit anti-PARP p85 fragment (Promega, Madison, WI), mouse anti-Cdc27 (Transduction laboratories), rabbit anti-TRIP1/proteasome S8 subunit (Calbiochem), mouse anti-Bub3 (Transduction laboratories), rabbit anti-phosphorylated histone H3 (Upstate biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) and mouse anti-β tubulin (Amersham biosciences, Piscataway, NJ).

Results

Isolation of TRIP1/S8/hSug1 fragment as a spindle poison-mediated cell death enhancer

We noted that mitotic cells undergoing apoptosis exhibited increased adherence to the culture substratum compared with healthy mitotic cells. This allowed us to select for cells containing plasmids whose expression caused increased apoptosis in cells treated with spindle poisons. After screening three million cDNA's, we obtained 34 candidate plasmids, among which, seven cDNA fragments showed enhanced spindle poison-mediated cell killing when overexpressed in HeLa cells. For control purposes we established 48 clones from the cDNA library without selection. None among the 48 colonies showed elevated sensitivity to spindle poisons.

One of the positive clones pSC3 encoded a proteasome subunit TRIP1/S8/hSug1 (hereafter TRIP1/S8, NM_002805) with 87 amino acids truncated from its N-terminus (TRIP1(48-406)) (Fig.1 A). The TRIP1/S8 protein is an AAA (ATPases Associated with a variety of cellular Activities) family ATPase subunit in the 19S regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome (31, 32, 33). A subpopulation of TRIP1/S8 is found as a part of the APIS (AAA Proteins Independent of 20S) complex, which may play a role in transcriptional regulation independent of the full proteasome (34, 35).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Expression of truncated TRIP1/S8 sensitizes cells to spindle poison (A) Schematic presentation of TRIP1/S8/hSug1 and the pSC3 product TRIP1(88-406) that lacks 87 amino acids at the N terminus. TRIP1/S8 is an AAA (ATPases Associated with a variety of cellular Activities) family ATPase subunit found in the 19S regulatory complex of the proteasome. (B) Stable expression of a fragment of the TRIP1/S8 proteasome protein increases cell sensitivity to nocodazole and Taxol in a colony formation assay. The OP-TRIP1(88-406) line, which stably expresses the fragment of the TRIP1/S8 protein (Supplementary figure 1), shows decreased cell proliferation compared to the control cells when challenged with nocodazole or Taxol at low concentration for eight days. Representative plates are shown in left. Cell proliferation was quantified and presented as percentages normalized to zero drug dose. Black bars represent controls. Grey bars represent the OP-TRIP1(88-406) cell line. It is likely that the truncated form of TRIP1/S8 acts in a dominant negative fashion since overproduction of the full length TRIP1/S8 did not significantly affect spindle poison sensitivity (see Supplementary figure 2).

To confirm the impact of the cDNA expression on spindle poison-mediated cell killing, we generated a HeLa-based cell line that stably expresses TRIP1(88-406) (hereafter OP-TRIP1(88-406)). The messenger overexpression was verified by quantitative PCR (Supplementary figure 1). In standard culture conditions, the estimated doubling time was 18.1 +/−0.7 hours for OP-TRIP1(88-406) and 18.1 +/−1.9 hours for control parental HeLa cells; thus growth rates were comparable. FACS analysis showed no apparent difference in the cell cycle profiles comparing cycling HeLa cells and OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells (unpublished results). Annexin V labeling indicated no difference in spontaneous apoptotic death rate in standard culture conditions (less than 2.5%). However, in colony growth assays, OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells were significantly more sensitive than controls to the microtubule-depolymerizing drug nocodazole and the microtubule-stabilizing drug Taxol (Fig. 1B). OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells did not show heightened sensitivity to the topoisomeraseII inhibitor VM26 nor to the DNA damaging drug bleomycin (data not shown).

Proteasome activity is compromised in OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells

The construct isolated with our screen encodes a protein fragment that lacks the N terminal 87 amino acids of TRIP1/S8. We speculated that it may function in a dominant negative manner and interfere with normal proteasome activity. To test this hypothesis, we compared proteasome activities in extracts from control cells and OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells using the fluorogenic proteasome substrate SucLLVY-AMC (Fig. 2 A) (36, 37). OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells showed a 34% reduction in proteasome activity compared to control HeLa cells in asynchronous culture, and a 20% reduction in cells arrested with nocodazole. These results suggest that proteasome function is partially compromised in OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells. Proteasome activity is required at several stages of the cell cycle, for example to degrade mitotic cyclins and allow cell cycle progression. We reasoned that lower proteasome activity associated with expression of the TRIP1/S8 fragment might lead to increased sensitivity to challenge by sub-lethal concentrations of proteasome inhibitor in a growth assay. We treated OP-TRIP1(88-406) with MG132 or ALLN, drugs that inhibit proteasome function in assays in cultured cells (18). OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells showed reduced cell proliferation when treated with low concentrations of MG132 or ALLN (Fig.2 B). To distinguish if the truncated protein was functioning as a dominant negative, we generated a HeLa-based cell line that overexpressed the full length TRIP1/S8 protein (Supplementary figure 2). We observed an increase in proteasome activity in the extract, but the sensitivity to spindle poisons showed little difference from control. This supports that the truncated protein is dominant negative form.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Stable expression of an N-terminal truncation of the proteasome subunit TRIP1/S8 results in decreased proteasome activity and elevated sensitivity to proteasome inhibitors. (A) Proteasome activity is reduced in OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells in both asynchronous culture and in cells treated with nocodazole. Cell extracts were prepared and incubated with fluorogenic proteasome substrate III (SucLLVY-AMC) for 30 and 60 minutes in 37°C, and fluorescence was measured. The conversion rate was calculated and proteasome activity in extracts from OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells was compared with extracts from control HeLa cells in both normal cultures (left panel) and in cultures treated with nocodazole (100ng/ml, 16 hours) (right panel). (B) OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells show markedly decreased cell proliferation compared to the parental line when treated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (upper panel) or ALLN (lower panel) for eight days. Experiments were repeated at least three times and a typical result is shown. Quantification of cell proliferation is shown in the right panel. Cell proliferation was normalized to zero drug dose. Black bars: Control Hela cells. Grey bars: OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells.

Spindle poisons enhance mitotic apoptosis in OP-TRIP1(88-406)

To study further the spindle poison sensitivity of OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells, we observed the cellular responses to spindle poison treatment over shorter time ranges by live cell microscopy. Used at moderate doses (25-200ng/ml), nocodazole causes mitotic arrest of most cultured cells within one cell cycle without immediate cytotoxicity. Normally we and other researchers use nocodazole at 100 ng/ml to accumulate living cells in M phase. We reasoned that direct microscopic observation of the effects of expression of TRIP1(88-406) would provide information about the mechanism of enhanced toxicity to nocodazole. We synchronized HeLa and OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells in early S phase with a double block in aphidicolin (a inhibitor of DNA polymerase), released the cells into medium containing nocodazole, and examined them by phase contrast microscopy (Fig. 3 A and B). Control HeLa cells entered mitosis about 6 hours after release and remained arrested in mitosis. After 14 hours, a small proportion of control cells began to exhibit membrane blebbing, characteristic of apoptosis during mitotic arrest. OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells entered mitosis about 6-8 hours after release from S phase arrest and remained arrested in mitosis. However, a larger proportion of OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells became apoptotic soon after mitotic arrest. Apoptotic cells were counted and the apoptotic percentage in the total cells is plotted as the dark grey regions in Fig.3A. Shown in light grey represents percentage of normal mitotic cells. Frames from a time lapse video of the apoptotic phenotype of OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells are shown in Fig. 3 B, revealing conversion of the normal rounded mitotic cells in the first panel to the advanced apoptotic cells in the last panel. We also examined whether the membrane blebbing phenotype correlated with apoptosis. Approximately fifty percent of the blebbing cells were annexin V-positive, compared to less than three percent of cells with smooth membranes, suggesting that the membrane blebbing is an early sign of apoptosis, preceding cell surface exposure of phosphatidylserine detected by annexin V. In all, these experiments indicate that expression of TRIP1(88-406) facilitates mitotic apoptosis under spindle poison challenge.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells undergo accelerated mitotic apoptosis in the presence of spindle poisons. (A) OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells show increased apoptosis when examined after treatment with nocodazole. HeLa and OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells were synchronized in early S phase with a double aphidicolin block, and released into medium containing nocodazole (100ng/ml). Cell morphology was monitored by phase contrast microscopy at the indicated time points. Rounded cells with smooth surfaces were scored as normal mitotic cells. Cells with membrane protrusions (blebs) were scored as apoptotic (dark grey). (B) An example of a OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells undergoing apoptosis. Cells were synchronized and released into nocodazole as in (A), and filmed with time-lapse video microscopy. Video recording was initiated 3 hours after the cells under observation had entered mitosis in the presence of nocodazole (time 3:00). Most OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells arrested in mitosis for 3.5-5.8 hours and then initiated membrane blebbing. Most parental HeLa cells remained arrested in mitosis without showing blebbing for at least 10 hours (not shown). Magnification bar 20μm. (C) Apoptosis was initiated during nocodazole-mediated mitotic arrest. HeLa and OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells were treated with 100ng/ml nocodazole for 4 hours. Rounded mitotic cells were collected and further cultured in medium containing nocodazole (100ng/ml). At the indicated times, cell extracts were prepared, proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting. Equal amounts of protein were loaded in each lane. OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells show accelerated cleavage of PARP, dephosphorylation and loss of the Cdc27 protein, and loss of BubR1 protein while Cyclin B levels remain high during continued incubation in nocodazole. (D) Comparison of FACS profiles revealed an increase in PARP fragment-positive cells with G2/M DNA content in nocodazole-treated OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells compared to controls. We treated control and OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells without or with nocodazole (100ng/ml) for 16 or 24 hours and collected samples for FACS analysis. The DNA content of all sample cells is displayed in upper row (All cells). The samples are also labeled with anti-PARP fragment antibody then by FITC secondary antibody. In some panels, percentage of cells with G2/M DNA content is shown as inset.

Both compromised spindle checkpoint function and elevated apoptosis in response to challenge with spindle poisons have been associated with deregulation of the expression of spindle checkpoint components (13-17, 38). We tested nocodazole-treated HeLa and OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells to compare whether mitotic and/or apoptotic marker proteins behave differently, and whether the levels of expression of spindle checkpoint proteins are affected. We treated cells with nocodazole (100ng/ml) for 4 hours, collected the arrested mitotic cells, incubated the mitotic cells further with nocodazole for the indicated amount of time up to 20 hours, and prepared samples for immunoblotting (Fig. 3C). Cyclin B levels remained high in both control and in OP-TRIP1(88-406), suggesting the cells remained arrested in mitosis with high Cdk1/Cyclin B kinase activity. The PARP (Poly ADP Ribose Polymerase) cleavage fragment, a marker of apoptosis generated by caspases 3 and 7, appeared after 16 hours of nocodazole treatment in control HeLa cells. In contrast, in OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells, the PARP fragment was apparent at 4 hours and increased with time. Cdc27 is a component of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. In mitosis Cdc27 is multiply phosphorylated and undergoes a large mobility shift on SDS-PAGE gels. Cdc27 is also a caspase-3-like protease target and is degraded during apoptosis (39). With time in nocodazole, the mitotic hyperphosphorylation of Cdc27 remained high in control HeLa cells, whereas in OP-TRIP1(88-406), both the phosphorylation and total amount of Cdc27 protein decreased, consistent with increased apoptosis in OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells. Expression of the spindle checkpoint component BubR1 in OP-TRIP1(88-406) was of particular interest because the level of this protein has been proposed to serve as a link between spindle checkpoint and spindle poison-mediated cell killing (13). The BubR1 expression level was comparable with or slightly higher than that of control cells at 4 hours. However, with time, BubR1 levels diminished more rapidly in the OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells.

We interpreted the results above as indicating that the OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells initiate apoptosis directly from mitosis after spindle poison treatment. To verify this interpretation, we asked in which phases of the cell cycle phase, PARP fragments, an apoptotic marker, were generated in response to spindle poison. We collected control and OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells with or without nocodazole treatment, labeled PARP fragment positive cells by immunofluorescence, and monitored the cell cycle by FACS (Fig. 3D). Without nocodazole, the cell cycle profiles of control and OP-TRIP1(88-406) were indistinguishable, and small number of apoptotic cells (PARP fragment positive cells/PARP+) were observed preferentially in the population with sub-G1 DNA content in both cell lines. With nocodazole treatment, both cell types arrested in G2/M. The degree of G2/M arrest appeared to be higher in OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells (G2/M: 59% after 16 hours in nocodazole) than in controls (G2/M: 40% after 16 hours in nocodazole). Monitoring nocodazole-treated, PARP positive cells, we observed two peaks in sub-G1 and in G2/M in both cell lines, indicating a population of PARP fragment positive cells has G2/M DNA content (asterisks in right side panels). The ratio of PARP-positive G2/M cells is consistently higher in OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells than in controls, as indicated in Fig 3D inset. Together, the results in Fig 3 suggest that that cells expressing truncated TRIP1 are arrested in mitosis more readily than controls in response to spindle poisons and, cells expressing truncated TRIP1 are more prone to apoptosis during mitosis than are control cells.

Drug-mediated inhibition of the proteasome increases cytotoxicity and apoptosis in cells treated with spindle poisons

The identification of a truncated proteasome subunit as a spindle poison-sensitizing factor and the observed decrease in proteasome activity in OP-TRIP1(88-406) (Fig. 2A) suggested that inhibition of proteasome activity might generally enhance the cytotoxicity induced by spindle poisons. To test this idea using an independent approach, we treated asynchronous HeLa cell cultures with nocodazole or Taxol for 16 hours with or without co-treatment with the proteasome inhibitor, MG132. The percentage of dead cells was assessed microscopically using the Live/Dead cell death assay kit (Molecular Probes), which determines the fraction of cells with disrupted plasma membranes. A combination of MG-132 with either nocodazole or Taxol showed higher cytotoxicity than any of the drugs alone. The combination of MG132 with nocodazole appeared to show synergistic effects while the combination of MG132 and Taxol was additive (Fig 4A). To examine the effects on a biochemical marker of apoptosis we collected samples and monitored generation of the PARP cleavage fragment by immunoblot (Fig. 4B). When used alone each drug induced low level production of the PARP fragment. However, when cells were incubated in either nocodazole or Taxol, co-treatment with MG132 showed much higher generation of the PARP fragment.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Treatment of HeLa cells with spindle poisons and a proteasome inhibitor increases cytotoxicity and apoptosis. (A) MG132 enhances cell death due to spindle poisons. HeLa cells were treated with nocodazole (100ng/ml), MG132 (10μM) or, Taxol (20nM) alone or in combination with MG132 (10μM) for 16 hours. Cell death was scored using fluorescent markers of membrane permeability (Molecular probes Live/Dead cell death assay kit). (B) Immunoblot for an apoptosis marker, PARP fragment. HeLa cells were treated with nocodazole (100ng/ml; noc100, or 50ng/ml, noc50) alone, MG132 (1μM; MG1) alone, Taxol (20nM; Tax20, or 10nM; Tax10) alone, nocodazole and MG132 (noc100+MG1, or noc50+MG1), or Taxol and MG132 (Tax20+MG1, or Tax10+MG1) simultaneously for 16 hours, and monitored for generation of PARP fragment. β-tubulin is shown as a loading control. (C) Inactivation of the proteasome after mitotic arrest in HeLa cells does not significantly increase the level of apoptosis as monitored by PARP fragmentation. HeLa cells were treated with nocodazole (100ng/ml) or Taxol (1 μM) for 4 hours and mitotic cells were collected by shake off. The mitotic cells were then incubated in the same microtubule drug for an additional 4 and 8 hours with or without the addition of MG132 (10μM). Extracts were prepared and blotted for PARP fragmentation.

Initiation of cell death during mitosis with perturbed proteasome function led us to investigate whether the modulatory effect of proteasome inhibition on the cytotoxic response to spindle poisons occurred during M phase or during another phase of the cell cycle. We tested whether proteasome inhibition would increase apoptosis in cells that were already in M phase. We treated HeLa cell cultures for 4 hours with nocodazole (100ng/ml) or Taxol (1μM) and collected the arrested mitotic cells. We then treated each population for an additional 4 or 8 hours with spindle poisons in the presence or absence of MG132 (10μM). After this time we collected samples and monitored PARP cleavage fragment production by immunoblotting (Fig. 4C). Surprisingly, treatment with MG132 did not substantially increase PARP fragment production in cells that were already arrested in M phase with both spindle poisons. Thus sequential inactivation of the proteasome after mitotic arrest did not seem to enhance mitotic apoptosis. This finding suggests that the target of proteasome inhibition may function prior to M phase.

SiRNA-mediated TRIP1/S8 protein knockdown resulted in mitotic cell accumulation, enhanced cell killing with spindle poison treatment, and compromised proteasome function

The studies above led us to investigate further the function of endogenous TRIP1/S8 and cellular responses to spindle poisons by siRNA-mediated inhibition of TRIP1/S8. We transfected siRNA into HeLa cells, and forty hours later, we treated the cells with normal medium or with medium containing nocodazole (100ng/ml) for a further eight hours. We then observed the effects by phase contrast microscopy (Fig. 5 A). The results of these treatments were quantified in Fig 5B. In the absence of nocodazole, cells treated with TRIP1/S8 siRNA (+TRIP1/S8 siRNA) were viable but exhibited a higher mitotic index and a higher percentage of Annexin V positive (apoptotic) cells. The number of propidium iodide (PI)-positive cells (necrotic or terminal stage in apoptosis) was approximately equal to that of the control. Nocodazole treatment led to an increase in the number of mitotic cells and Annexin V-positive cells, the normal response to spindle poison. When TRIP1/S8 siRNA-treated cells were incubated in nocodazole, the number of cells that were Annexin V or PI positive increased while the number of healthy mitotic cells was decreased. We interpret this reduction of healthy mitotic cells as the result of increased apoptosis initiated during mitotic arrest.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

SiRNA-mediated TRIP1/S8 repression results in mitotic cell accumulation, enhanced cell killing with spindle poison treatment, and compromised proteasome function (A) Cellular phenotype. HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA against GFP (Control) or against TRIP1/S8 (TRIP1). Forty hours later cells were incubated with or without 100ng/ml nocodazole, cultured further for eight hours, and observed by phase contrast microscopy. Mitotic cells have smooth round morphology. Note cells in lower right panel (TRIP1 siRNA, nocodazole+) show many apoptotic cells with membrane blebbing. Magnification bar is 20μm. (B) Phenotype quantification. Cells treated as in (A) were stained with fluorescent Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI), and categorized into three phenotypes: Annexin V positive (black area: early apoptotic cells), Mitotic (grey area: rounded, healthy mitotic cells) and Necrotic (PI-positive; textured area: Necrotic cells and apoptotic cells in terminal stages). The sum of three categories represents the total rounded cells. (C) Immunoblots. Cell extracts were prepared from the treated cultures and monitored for TRIP1/S8, PARP fragment (apoptosis marker), Cdc27, phosphorylated histone H3 (mitotic marker) and β-tubulin (loading control). Ct:Control, Tr:TRIP1. (D) In TRIP1/S8 siRNA-treated cells proteasome activity was reduced by 60% compared with control. HeLa cells were transfected with siRNA against GFP (negative control, black bars) or against TRIP1/S8 (grey bars). Forty eight hours after transfection, cell extracts were prepared and, after equalizing the protein amount, were incubated with fluorogenic proteasome substrate III (SucLLVY-AMC) at 37°C for 30 and 60 minutes. The conversion rate was calculated and normalized to control transfectants.

We prepared extracts from duplicate cultures and monitored the amount for TRIP1/S8, PARP fragment, Cdc27, phosphorylated histone H3, BubR1 and β-tubulin (Fig. 5 C). The siRNA treatment produced a 50-70% reduction of TRIP1/S8 protein expression in both cycling cells and cells incubated with nocodazole. In siRNA-treated cells incubated in nocodazole we detected enhanced production of the PARP fragment, and diminished levels and phosphorylation of the Cdc27 protein. However we did not observe significant differences in BubR1 expression.

To test whether TRIP1/S8 knockdown resulted in reduction of general proteasome activity, we transfected HeLa cells with TRIP1/S8 siRNA, prepared cell extracts and measured proteasome activity (Fig. 5 D). We observed a 60% reduction of proteasome activity in extracts with from TRIP1/S8 siRNA-treated cultures (Fig. 5D; grey bar), compared with that in extracts from control siRNA transfections (black bar). We also obtained the same reduction in proteasome activity using the 293T cell line (data not shown). Thus repression of TRIP1/S8 leads to proteasome inhibition.

We performed cell cycle analysis using the TRIP1 knockdown cells along with controls (Supplementary figure 3). Although the SiRNA transfection procedure produced higher numbers of apoptotic cells in the subG1 DNA content region, we observed that TRIP1 knockdown cells also showed a population of apoptotic cells with a G2/M DNA content when treated with spindle poisons, particularly nocodazole. However, the level of G2/M apoptotic cells in the siRNA-treated cell population was less than that obtained from expression of the truncated TRIP1 protein shown in Fig. 3D.

DISCUSSION

Mammalian cancer cells treated with clinically relevant doses of spindle poison eventually undergo apoptosis either directly from mitosis (mitotic apoptosis) or after an abnormal mitotic exit. Given the current routine use of spindle poisons (e.g. Taxol/Paclitaxel, vinblastine) for cancer chemotherapy, identification of cellular factors that modulate the cell death response is critical in elucidating the mechanisms involved.

We report the identification of a cDNA fragment, pSC3, expressing an N-terminal truncation of the 19S proteasome component TRIP1/S8 by from an expression screen aimed at isolating enhancers of spindle poison-mediated cell killing. Expression of truncated TRIP1/S8 protein appears to work as a dominant-negative for proteasome function. Decreased proteasome activity sensitizes HeLa cells to spindle poisons and proteasome inhibitors in growth assays. Microscopic analysis indicated that it caused increased mitotic apoptosis. SiRNA-mediated knockdown of TRIP1/S8 also resulted in compromised proteasome function and enhanced cell death with spindle poisons. In contrast, overproduction of TRIP1/S8 full length resulted in an increase in proteasome activity and in subtle resistance to spindle poisons (Supplementary figure 2). These results suggest that TRIP1/S8 function is linked to proteasome activity, and that proteasome activity plays critical role in spindle poison-mediated cell death. These findings also suggest that the TRIP1/S8 may be valid target for enhancing spindle poison-mediated cell killing in cancer therapy.

It appears that in OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells, spindle poison-mediated cell death is initiated from mitotic arrest, rather than after the exit of mitosis. The simultaneous finding of high Cyclin B accumulation, high Cdc27 phosphorylation and the appearance of the PARP apoptosis marker fragment in OP-TRIP1(88-406) cells after only 4 hours of nocodazole treatment (Fig. 3 C) are consistent with this interpretation. Cell cycle analysis of PARP fragment-positive cells also supports this view (Fig. 3D). Since BubR1 reduction appears to take place after initiation of apoptosis, it is unlikely to be the direct cause of apoptosis, although the reduction may accelerate apoptosis. This conclusion is supported by results from TRIP1/S8 siRNA-treated cells, in which BubR1 amount was not significantly affected when apoptosis occurred (Fig. 5B).

Our results are notable given recent interest in the proteasome and proteasome inhibitors in cancer chemotherapy (e.g.18-21). Our identification of a proteasome subunit in this screen suggests that the proteasome may be a promising target in multidrug strategies with spindle poisons. Consistent with this idea, we also show that simultaneous treatment of cultured cells with spindle poisons and a proteasome inhibitor caused enhanced cell death (Fig. 4 AB). Studies by others indicated that Bortezomib (also known as Velcade, PS341), a proteasome inhibitor with clinical potential (18-21), enhances the cytotoxic activity of spindle poisons docetaxel (40) and Taxol (41) against tumor xenografts. The precise molecular mechanisms by which inhibition of the proteasome impacts mitotic apoptosis and the reaction to spindle poisons remain uncertain. Based on our evidence we suggest that cells with deficient proteasome activity may enter mitosis inadequately prepared, perhaps through insufficient removal of a cell cycle inhibitor. This inappropriate state may trigger an apoptotic pathway. Alternatively, recent study indicates that the proteasome plays a key role in transcriptional regulation (42). Indeed some evidence implicates TRIP1/S8 in direct regulation of transcription either within or apart from its role in the 19S proteasome (34, 35). Transcriptional errors may result in altered expression of proteins that play important roles in mitosis, and it may leave cells more prone to apoptosis during mitosis. This interpretation is consistent with our analysis that the window for enhancing mitotic apoptosis of spindle poisons with proteasome inhibitor is prior to not during M phase (Fig 4C). Another but not mutually exclusive possibility is that proteasome inhibition alters the state of apoptotic machinery and makes cells prone to apoptosis. Further investigation will be required to test these possibilities.

Overall, our results suggest that inhibition of TRIP1/S8 and/or the proteasome alters cellular physiology and leaves cells prone to apoptosis when they are arrested in mitosis with spindle poisons. Our results suggest that targeting TRIP1/S8 or other components of the 19S proteasome may be useful in anticancer therapy either alone or in combination with spindle poisons. Known proteasome inhibitors (e.g. peptide boronate (Bortezomib/Velcade), lactacystin, peptide aldehyde (MG132, MG115)) target catalytic residues for proteolysis in 20S proteasome catalytic core particle (18). TRIP1/S8, and possibly other ATPase subunits in 19S regulatory complex, may be useful additional targets for inhibition of proteasome activity.

Supplementary Material

figure S1
figure S2
figure S3
legend

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. M. Kallio (VTT Biotechnology, Turku, Finland) and T. Stukenberg (University of Virginia, VA) for discussion of this work, and we thank T. Stukenberg for providing BubR1 antibody. We appreciate Dr. J. Henthorn (University of Oklahoma, Health Sciences Center, OK) for his assistance in FACS analysis. We are grateful to L. Ahonen, J. Daum, J. Hudson, T. Jones, W. Martin, B. Pittman, T. Potapova and V. Vorozhko for support in the laboratory.

Footnotes

Grant support

This research is supported by a fellowship from the Breast Cancer Research Program of the US Department of Defense to H. Y. Yamada (DAMD17-02-1-0532), and by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Science (RO1-GM50412) to G. J. Gorbsky.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bhalla KN. Microtubule-targeted anticancer agents and apoptosis. Oncogene. 2003;22:9075–86. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jordan MA, Wilson L. Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:253–65. doi: 10.1038/nrc1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mollinedo F, Gajate C. Microtubules, microtubule-interfering agents and apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2003;8:413–50. doi: 10.1023/a:1025513106330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Blagosklonny MV, Fojo T. Molecular effects of paclitaxel: myths and reality (a critical review) Int J Cancer. 1999;83(2):151–6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991008)83:2<151::aid-ijc1>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bharadwaj R, Yu H. The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23:2016–27. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cleveland DW, Mao Y, Sullivan KF. Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell. 2003;112:407–21. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00115-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gorbsky GJ. The mitotic spindle checkpoint. Curr Biol. 2001;11:R1001–4. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00609-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Weaver BA, Cleveland DW. Decoding the links between mitosis, cancer, and chemotherapy: The mitotic checkpoint, adaptation, and cell death. Cancer Cell. 2005;8(1):7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.DeLuca JG, Moree B, Hickey JM, Kilmartin JV, Salmon ED. hNuf2 inhibition blocks stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment and induces mitotic cell death in HeLa cells. J Cell Biol. 2002;159:549–55. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200208159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hori T, Haraguchi T, Hiraoka Y, Kimura H, Fukagawa T. Dynamic behavior of Nuf2-Hec1 complex that localizes to the centrosome and centromere and is essential for mitotic progression in vertebrate cells. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:3347–62. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bacus SS, Gudkov AV, Lowe M, Lyass, et al. Taxol-induced apoptosis depends on MAP kinase pathways (ERK and p38) and is independent of p53. Oncogene. 2001;20:147–55. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Deacon K, Mistry P, Chernoff J, Blank JL, Patel R. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase mediates cell death and p21-activated kinase mediates cell survival during chemotherapeutic drug-induced mitotic arrest. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:2071–87. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-10-0653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shin HJ, Baek KH, Jeon AH, et al. Dual roles of human BubR1, a mitotic checkpoint kinase, in the monitoring of chromosomal instability. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:483–97. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00302-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Michel L, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Narayan G, Hernando E, Murty VV, Benezra R. Complete loss of the tumor suppressor MAD2 causes premature cyclin B degradation and mitotic failure in human somatic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4459–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306069101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kops GJ, Foltz DR, Cleveland DW. Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:8699–704. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401142101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang Y, Lees E. Identification of an overlapping binding domain on Cdc20 for Mad2 and anaphase-promoting complex: model for spindle checkpoint regulation. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:5190–9. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.15.5190-5199.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee EA, Keutmann MK, Dowling ML, Harris E, Chan G, Kao GD. Inactivation of the mitotic checkpoint as a determinant of the efficacy of microtubule-targeted drugs in killing human cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004;3:661–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kisselev AF, Goldberg AL. Proteasome inhibitors: from research tools to drug candidates. Chem Biol. 2001;8(8):739–58. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(01)00056-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Adams J. The development of proteasome inhibitors as anticancer drugs. Cancer Cell. 2004;5:417–21. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(04)00120-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Adams J, Palombella VJ, Sausville EA, et al. Proteasome inhibitors: a novel class of potent and effective antitumor agents. Cancer Res. 1999;59:2615–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Almond JB, Cohen JM. The proteasome: a novel target for cancer chemotherapy. Leukemia. 2002;4:433–43. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Malumbres M, Barbacid M. To cycle or not to cycle: a critical decision in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1(3):222–31. doi: 10.1038/35106065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Attaix D, Combaret L, Pouch MN, Thailander D. Regulation of proteolysis. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2001;4(1):45–9. doi: 10.1097/00075197-200101000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pagano M. Cell cycle regulation by the ubiquitin pathway. FASEB J. 1997;11(13):1067–75. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.11.13.9367342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hershko A. Roles of ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis in cell cycle control. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9(6):788–99. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(97)80079-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hershko A, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:425–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bochtler M, Ditzel L, Groll M, Hartmann C, Huber R. THE PROTEASOME. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure. 1999;28:295–317. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.28.1.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gordon C, McGurk G, Wallace M, Hastie ND. A conditional lethal mutant in the fission yeast 26 S protease subunit mts3+ is defective in metaphase to anaphase transition. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(10):5704–11. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.10.5704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kallio M, Weinstein J, Daum JR, Burke DJ, Gorbsky GJ. Mammalian p55CDC mediates association of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex, and is involved in regulating anaphase onset and late mitotic events. J Cell Biol. 1998;141:1393–406. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.6.1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Martello LA, McDaid HM, Regl DL, et al. Taxol and discodermolide represent a synergistic drug combination in human carcinoma cell lines. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:1978–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lee JW, Ryan F, Swaffield JC, Johnston SA, Moore DD. Interaction of thyroid-hormone receptor with a conserved transcriptional mediator. Nature. 1995;374:91–4. doi: 10.1038/374091a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Akiyama K, Yokota K, Kagawa S, et al. cDNA cloning of a new putative ATPase subunit p45 of the human 26S proteasome, a homolog of yeast transcriptional factor Sug1p. FEBS Lett. 1995;363:151–6. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00304-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Su K, Yang X, Roos MD, Paterson AJ, Kudlow JE. Human Sug1/p45 is involved in the proteasome-dependent degradation of Sp1. Biochem J. 2000;348(Pt 2):281–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gonzalez F, Delahodde A, Kodadek T, Johnston SA. Recruitment of a 19S proteasome subcomplex to an activated promoter. Science. 2002;296:548–50. doi: 10.1126/science.1069490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Makino Y, Yoshida T, Yogosawa S, Tanaka K, Muramatsu M, Tamura TA. Multiple mammalian proteasomal ATPases, but not proteasome itself, are associated with TATA-binding protein and a novel transcriptional activator, TIP120. Genes Cells. 1999;4(9):529–39. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1999.00277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lightcap ES, McCormack TA, Pien CS, Chau V, Adams J, Elliott PJ. Proteasome inhibition measurements: clinical application. Clin Chem. 2000;46(5):673–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Feng Y, Longo DL, Ferris DK. Polo-like kinase interacts with proteasomes and regulates their activity. Cell Growth Differ. 2001;12(1):29–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Michel LS, Liberal V, Chatterjee A, et al. MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature. 2001;409:355–9. doi: 10.1038/35053094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhou BB, Li H, Yuan J, Kirschner MW. Caspase-dependent activation of cyclin-dependent kinases during Fas-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:6785–90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nawrocki ST, Sweeney-Gotsch B, Takamori R, McConkey DJ. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enhances the activity of docetaxel in orthotopic human pancreatic tumor xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004;3:59–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Teither BA, Ara G, Herbst R, Palombella VJ, Adams J. The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 in cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:2638–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Muratani M, Tansey WP. How the ubiquitin-proteasome system controls transcription. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4:192–201. doi: 10.1038/nrm1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

figure S1
figure S2
figure S3
legend

RESOURCES