Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
editorial
. 2006 Nov 4;333(7575):928–929. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39017.633310.BE

Families with disabled children

Social and economic needs are high but remain largely unmet

Tricia Sloper 1,2, Bryony Beresford 1,2
PMCID: PMC1633747  PMID: 17082523

The profile of disabled children in the United Kingdom is changing. More disabled children and young people live in the UK than ever before (about 770 000 according to criteria defined in the Disability Discrimination Act), and the number of children with the most severe or complex needs—such as those with autistic spectrum conditions or with complex health and nursing needs—is also increasing. The needs of families with a disabled child, which involve input from professionals working in many different agencies, are often unmet. This situation will continue unless efforts are made within the opportunities provided by new child and health service policies and structures (such as the Common Assessment Framework for Children and Young People; www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/deliveringservices/caf/) to give families better support.

Around 55% of families of disabled children live in poverty; they have been described as “the poorest of the poor.”1 It is within these constrained financial circumstances that families have to meet costs associated with bringing up a disabled child, which are estimated to be three times those of bringing up a non-disabled child.2 Unlike in other families, paid work is not the potential solution. The child's care needs, multiple appointments with healthcare professionals, and lack of child care affect parents' ability to work. Mothers with disabled children are much less likely to have paid employment than other mothers.3 This means that many families are, to a greater or lesser extent, reliant on benefits. Indeed, state benefits are the sole source of income for 90% of lone parent families with a disabled child.3 Current disability benefits do not meet the additional outgoings associated with having a disabled child.2 In addition, it is the most disadvantaged families (including those from some minority ethnic groups) who are least likely to apply for the main disability benefit for families with a disabled child (disability living allowance).4,5 Such families are also less successful when they do apply.4

Parents with disabled children have higher levels of stress and lower levels of wellbeing than parents with non-disabled children. Factors influencing levels of stress include the child's sleep and behaviour problems, families' material resources, parents' employment situation, social support, unmet service needs, and parents' coping strategies.6 Some interventions have improved children's sleep and behaviour problems and parental stress.7-9 However, many parents report that they want but do not receive help in these areas.

Living in suitable housing and having appropriate equipment to assist with activities of daily living are also key factors promoting families' wellbeing. Yet most families report problems with their housing10 and unmet needs for equipment.11

Disabled children and their families often lack suitable local leisure facilities and accessible transport, and they often face hostile attitudes of staff and members of the public.12 These factors prevent them from taking part in activities as a whole family.

Parents frequently report the need for a break from caring. Such a break can provide time for themselves and their partners, and time to spend with their other children. Services that provide short term breaks can reduce mothers' stress, but many families have problems obtaining appropriate services.13 Children for whom provision is most inadequate include those with complex health needs or with challenging behaviour or autistic spectrum disorders and children from minority ethnic families.

How can primary care trusts respond to these issues? Studies of key worker services have consistently shown positive effects on unmet needs and family well-being.14 Key workers are part of the solution to ensuring a more holistic assessment of families' social and economic needs. However, key workers cannot provide access to resources that do not exist in their local area. Thus primary care trusts can have several roles. They can ensure that workers are aware of the needs of disabled children and their families. They can make sure that families are offered a key worker, that families' needs are assessed (by asking questions about the child's sleep patterns, housing problems, and parents' levels of stress, for example), and that appropriate interventions are available in their local area.

Primary care trusts can also promote strong multiagency working and commissioning of services for disabled children. They can also ensure that the needs of disabled children and their families are central to the agendas of children's trusts and that housing and leisure agencies are included in plans to meet these needs.

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Gordon D, Parker R, Loughran F, Heslop P. Disabled children in Britain: a re-analysis of the OPCS disability surveys. London: Stationery Office, 2000.
  • 2.Dobson B, Middleton S. Paying to care: the costs of childhood disability. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 1998.
  • 3.Beresford B. Expert opinions: a national survey of parents caring for a severely disabled child. Bristol: Policy Press, 1995.
  • 4.Roberts K, Lawton D. Reaching its target? Disability living allowance for children. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, 1998. (Social policy reports No 9.)
  • 5.Chamba R, Ahmad W, Hirst M, Lawton D, Beresford B. On the edge: minority ethnic families caring for a severely disabled child. Bristol: Policy Press, 1999.
  • 6.Wallander JL, Varni JW. Effects of pediatric chronic physical disorders on child and family adjustment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1998;39: 29-46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Beresford B, Sloper P, Baldwin S, Newman T. What works in services for families with a disabled child? London: Barnardos, 1996.
  • 8.Lancioni GE, O'Reilly MF, Basili G. Review of strategies for treating sleep problems in persons with severe or profound mental retardation or multiple handicaps. Am J Ment Retard 1999;104: 170-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Feldman M, Werner S. Collateral effects of behavioral parent training on families of children with developmental disabilities and behavior disorders. Behav Interventions 2002;17: 75-83. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Beresford B, Oldman C. Housing matters: national evidence relating to disabled children and their housing. Bristol: Policy Press, 2002.
  • 11.Beresford B, Williams J, Lawton D. Community equipment: use and needs of disabled children and their families. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, 2002.
  • 12.Finch N, Lawton D, Williams J, Sloper P. Disability survey 2000: young people with a disability and sport. London: Sport England, 2001.
  • 13.Chan JB, Sigafoos J. Does respite care reduce parental stress in families with developmentally disabled children? Child Youth Care Forum 2001;30: 253-63. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liabo K, Newman T, Stephens J, Lowe K. A review of key worker systems for disabled children and the development of information guides for parents, children and professionals. Cardiff: Wales Office of Research and Development for Health and Social Care, 2001.

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES