Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2006 Nov;50(11):3897–3900. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00057-06

Telithromycin-Nonsusceptible Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Europe

Adnan Al-Lahham 1,, Peter C Appelbaum 2, Mark van der Linden 1, Ralf René Reinert 1,*
PMCID: PMC1635229  PMID: 17065627

Abstract

Telithromycin-nonsusceptible pneumococcal clinical isolates (n = 17) were analyzed for their antimicrobial susceptibility, macrolide resistance mechanisms, and genetic relatedness. All strains showed the erm(B) genotype and showed a wide range of combinations of macrolide resistance mechanisms. The predominant clone (n = 7) was serotype 14, sequence type 143.


Streptococcus pneumoniae continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in humans (14). The worldwide increase in antibiotic resistance in this species has become a serious problem within the last 20 years (2). Macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae is usually caused by methylation of A2058 of the 23S rRNA mediated by the erm(B) gene or by an efflux mechanism mediated by the mef gene (13). In addition, other mechanisms of macrolide resistance have been described (4, 20, 21). Ketolides form a new class of semisynthetic agents derived from erythromycin A designed to overcome erythromycin A resistance in S. pneumoniae. Ketolide compounds inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by interacting with the peptidyltransferase site of the 50S ribosomal subunit and interact closely with domains II, at A752, and V, at A2058 and A2059, of the 23S rRNA (1). Ketolides show good activity against gram-positive bacteria responsible for respiratory tract infections, including penicillin G- and erythromycin A-resistant S. pneumoniae (11). The ketolide-resistant pneumococci described usually show the erm(B) genotype, and some, but not all, strains show additional alterations in the L4 ribosomal protein (1, 16). The scope of the present paper was to investigate the occurrence of these mechanisms of resistance in a collection of 17 telithromycin-nonsusceptible pneumococcal isolates from Europe.

(This work was presented in part at the 45th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 16 to 19 December 2005, Washington, D.C. [1a]).

MIC testing was performed using the broth microdilution method recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) (5). PCR of macrolide resistance genes was performed as described previously (17). Sequencing of the 23S rRNA and the genes encoding the ribosomal proteins L4 (rplD) and L22 (rplV) was performed as reported earlier by Tait-Kamradt et al. (4, 21) and Walsh et al. (22). The erm(B) gene and the erm(B) promoter region were amplified by PCR using the primers published by Walsh et al. (22). Pneumococcal strains were serotyped by Neufeld's Quellung reaction using type and factor sera provided by the Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was carried out as described by Enright and Spratt (8). Phylogenetic analysis was performed as described before (18). Nucleotide sequences of the upstream regions of the erm gene were aligned using the program ClustalW. Sequence types (STs) of the telithromycin-nonsusceptible isolates were compared with those of all isolates available in the MLST database.

Demographic data and data on antibiotic resistance are presented in Table 1. Isolates were collected between 2001 and 2005 from patients with invasive and noninvasive pneumococcal disease, mostly in France (10 out of 17 strains). Telithromycin MICs ranged between 2 and 8 μg/ml. All strains were multiply resistant and besides being telithromycin nonsusceptible showed reduced susceptibility to β-lactams and resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and tetracycline. One strain additionally showed high-level fluoroquinolone resistance.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics, MICs, and resistance phenotypes of 17 telithromycin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae strains from Europe

Strain Country Source Yr of isolation Patient age (yr) MIC (μg/ml) ofa:
Phenotypeb
TEL PEN AMX CTX CLR CLI TET LVX SXT
PW 778 Belgium Sputum 2000 67 8 2 1 2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 1 ≥8/152 PMLTC
PW 521 France BALc 2001 44 8 4 2 2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 1 4/76 PMLTC
PW 868 France BAL 2001 59 2 4 ≥4 2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 1 0.25/4.75 PMLT
PW 899 France BAL 2001 64 4 4 4 2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 1 2/38 PMLTC
PW 1760 France Sinus 2001 31 4 2 2 2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 0.5 1/19 PMLTc
PW 1765 France BAL 2001 57 8 2 2 2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 1 0.25/4.75 PMLT
PW 1791 France Sputum 2002 53 8 1 0.5 1 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 1 1/19 pMLTc
PW 1840 France Blood 2002 59 4 2 2 2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 1 ≥8/152 PMLTC
PW 1981 France Sputum 2002 69 4 2 2 2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 2 4/76 PMLTC
PW 1976 France Sputum 2002 ND 2 2 2 ≥2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 2 8/152 PMLTC
PW 1996 France Blood 2002 81 2 4 2 2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 1 1/19 PMLTc
PN 302 Germany Blood 2003 34 8 0.5 0.25 0.125 ≥32 ≥32 16 1 1/19 pMLTc
PS 5646 Germany BAL 2005 58 8 2 2 1 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 1 4/76 PMLTC
PW 712 Spain Sputum 2001 56 4 2 4 ≥2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 2 8/152 PMLTC
PW 715 Spain Sputum 2001 70 2 2 2 1 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 1 0.25/4.75 PMLT
PW 735 Spain Sputum 2001 75 4 2 2 ≥2 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 ≥8/152 PMLTCF
PW 1420 Switzerland BAL 2002 30 8 1 0.5 1 ≥32 ≥32 ≥32 2 1/19 pMLTc
a

Breakpoints (intermediate and resistant, respectively) according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute: telithromycin (TEL), 2 and ≥4 μg/ml; penicillin G (PEN), 0.1 to 1 and ≥2 μg/ml; amoxicillin (AMX), 4 and ≥8 μg/ml; cefotaxime (CTX [nonmeningitis]), 2 and ≥4 μg/ml; clarithromycin (CLR), 0.5 μg/ml and ≥1 μg/ml; clindamycin (CLI), 0.5 and ≥1 μg/ml; tetracycline (TET), 4 and ≥8 μg/ml; levofloxacin (LVX), 4 and ≥8 μg/ml; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), 1/19 to 2/38 μg/ml and ≥4/76 μg/ml. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (MIC of ≤1 μg/ml). ND, no data.

b

Resistance phenotypes: p, penicillin G intermediate; P, penicillin G resistant; M, macrolide resistant; L, lincosamide resistant; T, tetracycline resistant; c, cotrimoxazole intermediate; C, cotrimoxazole resistant; F, fluoroquinolone resistant.

c

BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage.

Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics and results from MLST are presented in Table 2. The predominant serotype was type 14 (10 of 17 isolates). The predominant clone was ST 143 (7 of 17 isolates), which was found in France (n = 6) and Germany (n = 1). Telithromycin resistance has also spread to the Spain23F-1 clone (ST 81; n = 1) and its 19A variant. All strains showed the erm(B) genotype and the cMLSB phenotype and were negative for the mef gene. The isolates had multiple alterations in 23S rRNA. Analysis of the genes encoding ribosomal protein L22 showed a wild type for all isolates. Of note, in nine isolates an S20N alteration in ribosomal protein L4 was observed. Isolates belonging to one clone showed identical or quite similar resistance mechanisms. Of note, three clones were described for the first time in the present investigation (strain PW 778, ST 1569; PW 735, ST 1558; and PW 868, ST 2010) (Table 3).

TABLE 2.

Genotypic and phenotypic characterization and macrolide resistance mechanisms of 17 telithromycin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae strains from Europe

Strain Serotype STa Genotype Phenotype Alteration(s) in:
23S rRNAb Ribosomal protein
Erm(B)
L22 L4
Pn 302 15A 63 erm(B) cMLSB T107G, A1513T, T1514A, A1530T, T1531A, A1535G, A1745T WTc S20N I75T, H118R
PW 712 19A 81 erm(B) cMLSB C150T, A1745T, C2216T WT S20N N100S
PW 715 19A 81 erm(B) cMLSB C150T, A1745T, C2216T WT S20N N100S
PW 1981 23F 81 erm(B) cMLSB C150T, A1745T WT S20N I75T, H118R
PW 1976 14 143 erm(B) cMLSB A138G, A260G, A1745T WT WT N100S
PW 1996 14 143 erm(B) cMLSB A138G, A260G, A1745T WT WT E58A, I75T, N100S, H118R
PW 521 14 143 erm(B) cMLSB A138G, A260G, A1745T WT WT N100S
PW 899 14 143 erm(B) cMLSB A138G, A260G, A1745T WT WT N100S
PW 1760 14 143 erm(B) cMLSB C150T WT S20N I75T, H118R
PW 1765 14 143 erm(B) cMLSB A138G, A260G, A1745T WT WT N100S
PS 5646 14 143 erm(B) cMLSB T107G; A138G; A260G, C389T, A1745T WT WT I75T, H118R
PW 1840 14 156 erm(B) cMLSB A138G; A260G, A1745T WT WT I75T, N100S, H118R
PW 1420 14 276 erm(B) cMLSB C150T WT S20N I75T, N100S, H118R, V171A
PW 1791 19A 276 erm(B) cMLSB C150T WT S20N I75T, N100S, H118R, V171A
PW 735 19A 1558 erm(B) cMLSB C150T, A1745T, C2216T WT S20N N100S
PW 778 19A 1569 erm(B) cMLSB A138G, A260G, A1745T WT S20N I75T, N100S, H118R
PW 868 14 2010 erm(B) cMLSB A138G, A260G, A1745T WT WT N100S
a

The STs had the following alleles: ST 63, 2-5-36-12-17-21-14; ST81, 4-4-2-4-4-1-1; ST143, 7-5-10-18-6-8-1; ST 1569, 8-11-10-1-6-8-1; ST276, 2-19-2-17-6-22-14; ST 1558, 7-13-8-12-9-1-1; ST 2010, 7-5-140-18-6-8-215.

b

Mutations were found in all four copies of the 23S rRNA.

c

WT, wild type.

TABLE 3.

Genetic relatedness of telithromycin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae strains from Europe

Strain(s) in present study Sequence type Country (present study) Described serotype(s)a Country or countries in other reportsb Time
PN 302 63 Germany 15A Portugal, Spain, Italy, Sweden 1992-1998
PW 712, PW 715, PW 1981 81 France, Spain 23F, 19A, 19F, 14 Worldwide Since 1980s
PW 1976, PW 1996, PW 521, PW 899, PW 1760, PW 1765, PS 5646 143 France, Germany 14 Poland, Hungary, United States 1994-2002
PW 778 1569c Belgium 14, 9V, 3, 9A United Kingdom, Germany, France, Portugal 1997-2003
PW 1420, PW 1791 276 Switzerland, France 19A The Netherlands 1997
PW 735 1558c Spain 19A 2001
PW 1840 156 France 14 Worldwide 1988-2003
PW 868 2010c France 14 2001
a

Serotypes observed in the present study are given in boldface.

b

As available in the MLST database (www.mlst.net) by April 2006.

c

First described in the present study.

The DNA sequences of the erm(B) upstream region of the telithromycin-nonsusceptible clinical isolates were compared to the upstream sequence region of erm(B) found in Tn1545 (accession no. X52632) (15), erm(B) (accession no. AJ972605) (7), pAM77 (accession no. K00551) (12), and Tn917-like LP-1 (accession no. AB111455) (15) (Fig. 1). In the region upstream of the erm(B) start codon, mutations were found at positions −5, −6, −7, −28, −33, and −90 [upstream of the ATG start codon of erm(B)]. These mutations were homologous to mutations found at positions 320, 319, 318, 297, and 292 in Tn1545, respectively. In the open reading frame of erm(B), the mutation E58A was observed in 1 isolate, I75T was observed in 9 isolates, N100S was observed in 13 isolates, H118R was observed in 9 isolates, and V171A was observed in 2 isolates. However, some of the mutations described in the present study are likely not involved in resistance and are outside of regions that are known to interact with the ribosome. Therefore, these mutations may simply represent heterogeneity in the erm(B) gene and its promoter region.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Schematic representation of alterations of the regulatory sequences of erm(B) genes from isolates of S. sanguis (pAM77); S. pneumoniae containing Tn1545; and the clinical isolates PW 1840, PW 1981, PW 712, PW 715, and PW 735. The other 12 isolates show the Tn1545-like organization (27 amino acids). SD1 and SD2 (Shine-Dalgarno sites) represent the ribosomal binding sites for the control peptide and the erm(B) gene. −10 and −35 represent promoter regions. The numbers in the boxes represent the length of the open reading frame of the leader peptide. The nucleotides in boldface given at the end of the leader peptides represent insertions as compared to pAM77. The resulting sequence up to the next stop codon is given.

To our knowledge, the present report describes the largest collection of telithromycin-nonsusceptible clinical isolates characterized for their resistance mechanisms and their epidemiological background to date. The global surveillance project PROTEKT (Prospective Resistant Organism Tracking and Epidemiology for the Ketolide Telithromycin) reported that only 0.2% of S. pneumoniae isolates collected between 1999 and 2003 were resistant to telithromycin and that all showed the cMLSB phenotype (10). Concordantly, the present study and other studies on telithromycin resistance in S. pneumoniae report on resistance mainly in erm(B)-positive strains. In addition, a recent study showed that telithromycin can be removed from Streptococcus pyogenes by efflux, related to the presence of the mef gene (3). Faccone and coworkers have reported on a high-level telithromycin-resistant isolate from Argentina. The isolate was mef(E) positive, but erm(B) and erm(A) negative (9). In addition, substantial levels of telithromycin resistance were recently detected in a collection of soil isolates, possibly due to inactivation of the compound (6). Analysis of the clonal relatedness of the present collection of strains showed that telithromycin resistance was predominantly found among two clones, ST 81 and ST 143. ST 81 (Spain23F-1 clone and its serotype 19A variant) is known to be responsible for the worldwide spread of resistance among pneumococci (19).

In summary, the present study demonstrates that mutations in the erm(B) gene, its promoter region, ribosomal protein L4, and 23S rRNA may be associated with resistance to telithromycin in clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae. Although the incidence of telithromycin resistance in pneumococci remains rare worldwide, the spread of telithromycin resistance to multidrug resistance clones with worldwide distribution is a worrisome finding of the present study.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The GenBank accession numbers of the ermB (upstream region and open reading frame) sequences of this study are DQ855638 (PW1791 and PW1420), DQ855639 (PW899, PW1765, PW1976, and PW521), DQ855640 (PW1840), DQ855641 (PW712 and PW715), DQ855642 (PW1760), DQ855643 (PW735), DQ855644 (PW788), DQ855645 (PW868), DQ855646 (Pn302), DQ855647 (PW1981), DQ855648 (PS5646), and DQ855649 (PW1996).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sandra Barbosa for excellent technical assistance. We thank the PneumoWorld Study Group for cooperation and for providing the isolates.

This study was supported in part by grant RKI-415/1369235 from the German Ministry of Health (Bundesminister für Gesundheit) and by the German Ministry for Science and Technology (BMFT) (CAP net).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ackermann, G., and A. C. Rodloff. 2003. Drugs of the 21st century: telithromycin (HMR 3647)—the first ketolide. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:497-511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1a.Al-Lahham, A., and R. R. Reinert 2005. Molecular characterization and time-kill kinetics of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with reduced susceptibility to telithromycin, abstract C1-1418, p. 82. 45th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  • 2.Appelbaum, P. C. 2002. Resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae: implications for drug selection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:1613-1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Canton, R., A. Mazzariol, M. I. Morosini, F. Baquero, and G. Cornaglia. 2005. Telithromycin activity is reduced by efflux in Streptococcus pyogenes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55:489-495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Canu, A., B. Malbruny, M. Coquemont, T. A. Davies, P. C. Appelbaum, and R. Leclercq. 2002. Diversity of ribosomal mutations conferring resistance to macrolides, clindamycin, streptogramin, and telithromycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:125-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. 2005. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 15th informational supplement. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa.
  • 6.D'Costa, V. M., K. M. McGrann, D. W. Hughes, and G. D. Wright. 2006. Sampling the antibiotic resistome. Science 311:374-377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Douthwaite, S., J. Jalava, and L. Jakobsen. 2005. Ketolide resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes correlates with the degree of rRNA dimethylation by Erm. Mol. Microbiol. 58:613-622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Enright, M. C., and B. G. Spratt. 1998. A multilocus sequence typing scheme for Streptococcus pneumoniae identification of clones associated with serious invasive disease. Microbiology 144:3049-3060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Faccone, D., P. Andres, M. Galas, M. Tokumoto, A. Rosato, and A. Corso. 2005. Emergence of a Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolate highly resistant to telithromycin and fluoroquinolones. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5800-5803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Farrell, D. J., and D. Felmingham. 2004. Activities of telithromycin against 13,874 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected between 1999 and 2003. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1882-1884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hisanaga, T., D. J. Hoban, and G. G. Zhanel. 2005. Mechanisms of resistance to telithromycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 56:447-450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Horinouchi, S., W.-H. Byeon, and B. Weisblum. 1983. A complex attenuator regulates inducible resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin type B antibiotics in Streptococcus sanguis. J. Bacteriol. 154:1252-1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Leclercq, R. 2002. Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:482-492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Musher, D. M. 1992. Infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae: clinical spectrum, pathogenesis, immunity, and treatment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 14:801-807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Okitsu, N., S. Kaieda, H. Yano, R. Nakano, Y. Hosaka, R. Okamoto, T. Kobayashi, and M. Inoue. 2005. Characterization of ermB gene transposition by Tn1545 and Tn917 in macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:168-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rantala, M., M. Haanperä-Heikkinen, M. Lindgren, H. Seppälä, P. Huovinen, J. Jalava, and the Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance. 2006. Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates resistant to telithromycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1855-1858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Reinert, R. R., C. Franken, M. van der Linden, R. Lütticken, M. Cil, and A. Al-Lahham. 2004. Molecular characterisation of macrolide resistance mechanisms of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes isolated in Germany, 2002-2003. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 24:43-47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Reinert, R. R., M. R. Jacobs, P. C. Appelbaum, S. Bajaksouzian, S. Cordeiro, M. van der Linden, and A. Al-Lahham. 2005. Relationship between the original multiply resistant South African isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from 1977 to 1978 and contemporary international resistant clones. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:6035-6041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reinert, R. R., S. Muckel, A. Al-Lahham, B. G. Spratt, A. B. Brueggemann, R. Hakenbeck, and R. Lütticken. 2003. Characterization of German penicillin non-susceptible serotype 23F pneumococci using multilocus sequence typing. J. Med. Microbiol. 52:981-987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reinert, R. R., A. Wild, P. Appelbaum, R. Lütticken, M. Y. Cil, and A. Al-Lahham. 2003. Ribosomal mutations conferring resistance to macrolides in Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical strains isolated in Germany. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:2319-2322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tait-Kamradt, A., T. Davies, M. Cronan, M. R. Jacobs, P. C. Appelbaum, and J. Sutcliffe. 2000. Mutations in 23S rRNA and ribosomal protein L4 account for resistance in pneumococcal strains selected in vitro by macrolide passage. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2118-2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Walsh, F., J. Willcock, and S. Amyes. 2003. High-level telithromycin resistance in laboratory-generated mutants of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52:345-353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES