Skip to main content
PMC home page
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1996 Oct;40(10):2387–2391. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.10.2387

Microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans with and without agitation: an eight-center collaborative study.

E J Anaissie 1, V L Paetznick 1, L G Ensign 1, A Espinel-Ingroff 1, J N Galgiani 1, C A Hitchcock 1, M LaRocco 1, T Patterson 1, M A Pfaller 1, J H Rex 1, M G Rinaldi 1
PMCID: PMC163539  PMID: 8891149

Abstract

The growth patterns observed in the trailing wells when fluconazole is being tested may give rise to readings that suggest resistance or increased MICs for known susceptible strains. We conducted a multicenter study to evaluate the intralaboratory and interlaboratory reproducibilities of a method that uses agitation to disperse these types of growth. Ten strains of Candida albicans and five strains of Cryptococcus neoformans were tested against fluconazole, flucytosine, and amphotericin B by using a microdilution adaptation of the proposed reference method of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for yeasts (M27-T). The endpoint criterion used before agitation was consistent with the M27-T recommendation, while a criterion of 50% or more reduction of growth compared with the control was used after agitation. The results of this study showed that use of agitation and the modified endpoint criterion both improved intralaboratory and inter-laboratory agreement and increased the frequency of interpretable MICs. The MICs obtained by this method were comparable to those obtained by the broth macrodilution M27-T method. Like M27-T, this method was not able to definitely distinguish amphotericin B-susceptible from -resistant strains, although the MICs for the resistant strains were consistently higher than those for the susceptible ones. The findings imply that agitation should be seriously considered when antifungal agents, particularly fluconazole, are tested in a microdilution format.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (262.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anaissie E. J., Karyotakis N. C., Hachem R., Dignani M. C., Rex J. H., Paetznick V. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo activity of antifungal agents against Candida species. J Infect Dis. 1994 Aug;170(2):384–389. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.2.384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anaissie E., Paetznick V., Bodey G. P. Fluconazole susceptibility testing of Candida albicans: microtiter method that is independent of inoculum size, temperature, and time of reading. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Aug;35(8):1641–1646. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.8.1641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barchiesi F., Colombo A. L., McGough D. A., Rinaldi M. G. Comparative study of broth macrodilution and microdilution techniques for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards' proposed standard. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2494–2500. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2494-2500.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calhoun D. L., Roberts G. D., Galgiani J. N., Bennett J. E., Feingold D. S., Jorgensen J., Kobayashi G. S., Shadomy S. Results of a survey of antifungal susceptibility tests in the United States and interlaboratory comparison of broth dilution testing of flucytosine and amphotericin B. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):298–301. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.298-301.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Casadevall A., Spitzer E. D., Webb D., Rinaldi M. G. Susceptibilities of serial Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from patients with recurrent cryptococcal meningitis to amphotericin B and fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Jun;37(6):1383–1386. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.6.1383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Espinel-Ingroff A., Kish C. W., Jr, Kerkering T. M., Fromtling R. A., Bartizal K., Galgiani J. N., Villareal K., Pfaller M. A., Gerarden T., Rinaldi M. G. Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3138–3145. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3138-3145.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fromtling R. A., Galgiani J. N., Pfaller M. A., Espinel-Ingroff A., Bartizal K. F., Bartlett M. S., Body B. A., Frey C., Hall G., Roberts G. D. Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Jan;37(1):39–45. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Galgiani J. N., Reiser J., Brass C., Espinel-Ingroff A., Gordon M. A., Kerkering T. M. Comparison of relative susceptibilities of Candida species to three antifungal agents as determined by unstandardized methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Sep;31(9):1343–1347. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.9.1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Galgiani J. N. Susceptibility testing of fungi: current status of the standardization process. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Dec;37(12):2517–2521. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.12.2517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghannoum M. A., Ibrahim A. S., Fu Y., Shafiq M. C., Edwards J. E., Jr, Criddle R. S. Susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans: a microdilution technique. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):2881–2886. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2881-2886.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pfaller M. A., Burmeister L., Bartlett M. S., Rinaldi M. G. Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Aug;26(8):1437–1441. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1437-1441.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pfaller M. A., Dupont B., Kobayashi G. S., Müller J., Rinaldi M. G., Espinel-Ingroff A., Shadomy S., Troke P. F., Walsh T. J., Warnock D. W. Standardized susceptibility testing of fluconazole: an international collaborative study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Sep;36(9):1805–1809. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.9.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pfaller M. A., Rinaldi M. G., Galgiani J. N., Bartlett M. S., Body B. A., Espinel-Ingroff A., Fromtling R. A., Hall G. S., Hughes C. E., Odds F. C. Collaborative investigation of variables in susceptibility testing of yeasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Sep;34(9):1648–1654. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.9.1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Price M. F., LaRocco M. T., Gentry L. O. Fluconazole susceptibilities of Candida species and distribution of species recovered from blood cultures over a 5-year period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jun;38(6):1422–1424. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.6.1422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rex J. H., Cooper C. R., Jr, Merz W. G., Galgiani J. N., Anaissie E. J. Detection of amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates in a broth-based system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Apr;39(4):906–909. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.4.906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rex J. H., Pfaller M. A., Rinaldi M. G., Polak A., Galgiani J. N. Antifungal susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993 Oct;6(4):367–381. doi: 10.1128/cmr.6.4.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rodriguez-Tudela J. L., Martinez-Suarez J. V. Improved medium for fluconazole susceptibility testing of Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jan;38(1):45–48. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES