Abstract
TP0658 (FliW) and its orthologs, conserved proteins of unknown function in Treponema pallidum and other species, interact with a C-terminal region of flagellin (FlaB1-3 in T. pallidum; FliC in most other species). Mutants of orthologs in Bacillus subtilis and Campylobacter jejuni (yviF, CJ1075) showed strongly reduced motility. TP0658 stabilizes flagellin in a way similar to FliS, suggesting that TP0658 is a conserved assembly factor for the bacterial flagellum.
The motility of most bacterial species depends on the proper function of the flagellar apparatus. At least 50 proteins are required for its assembly and function (15).
In order to identify new components of the bacterial flagellar apparatus and their relationships, we tested all ∼1,000 open reading frames (ORFs) of Treponema pallidum for protein-protein interactions with the FliC homologs FlaB1, FlaB2, and FlaB3 (4) by systematic yeast two-hybrid assays. T. pallidum was chosen as a model for this systematic protein interaction analysis because of its limited genome size (8) and the availability of an ORFeome, that is, a complete set of cloned ORFs (8, 16).
TP0658 interacts with flagellin proteins.
First, all T. pallidum ORFs were cloned into yeast two-hybrid prey and bait vectors (pLP-GADT7 [Clontech] and pLP-GBKT7Amp, a derivative of pLP-GBKT7 [Clontech] with kanamycin resistance replaced by ampicillin resistance; pUniD entry and prey clones were kindly provided by T. Palzkill (16). The prey plasmids were converted into an array and screened with FliC homologs FlaB1, FlaB2, and FlaB3, as described by Cagney et al. (3). Surprisingly, screens with the three T. pallidum FliC homologs, FlaB1-3 (TP0868, TP0792, and TP0870), resulted in 24 different positives, among which one protein, TP0658 (FliW), was a widely conserved but uncharacterized protein of unknown function (Table 1) . The TP0658-flagellin interactions were highly specific because TP0658 was found only with the three flagellin baits but with none of several hundred other bait proteins we have screened (B. Titz et al., unpublished data). The TP0658-flagellin interaction could be also verified by using an overlay assay: flagellins of T. pallidum were tagged with a hemagglutinin (HA) peptide (YPYDVPDYA) and expressed in Escherichia coli (Tables 2 and 3), and lysates were gel separated and blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membrane was blocked and then incubated with 25 nM purified glutathione S-transferase (GST)-TP0658 fusion protein or 25 nM GST control protein, and the bound proteins were detected with either anti-GST or anti-HA antibodies (G1160 [Sigma-Aldrich, Germany], HA.11 [Covance Research Products, California]). Indeed, all three flagellin interactions of TP0658 could be verified in vitro by using this overlay assay (Fig. 1A).
TABLE 1.
Yeast two-hybrid interactions of flagellin proteins (sorted by prey)
| Baita | Preyb | Bait countc | Prey descriptiond |
|---|---|---|---|
| TP0870 | TP0005 | 10 | DNA gyrase, subunit A (gyrA) (Bacillus subtilis) |
| TP0870 | TP0046 | 13 | Hypothetical protein (Treponema pallidum) |
| TP0868 | TP0050 | 10 | Conserved hypothetical protein (Borrelia burgdorferi) |
| TP0792 | TP0064 | 8 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0870 | TP0066 | 11 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0792 | TP0160 | 13 | Prolyl-tRNA synthetase (proS) (Escherichia coli) |
| TP0870 | TP0174 | 1 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0870 | (TP0258) | 90 | Conserved hypothetical protein (Borrelia burgdorferi) |
| TP0870 | (TP0288) | 94 | Spore coat polysaccharide biosynthesis protein (spsF) |
| TP0870 | TP0396 | 14 | Flagellar basal-body rod protein (flgB) (Treponema denticola) |
| TP0870 | (TP0455) | 57 | Conserved hypothetical protein (Borrelia burgdorferi) |
| TP0870 | (TP0563) | 78 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0870 | TP0629 | 6 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0792 | TP0658 | 3 | Transmembrane protein, putative (Bacillus subtilis)* |
| TP0868 | TP0658 | 3 | Transmembrane protein, putative (Bacillus subtilis)* |
| TP0870 | TP0658 | 3 | Transmembrane protein, putative (Bacillus subtilis)* |
| TP0868 | (TP0661) | 57 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0870 | (TP0661) | 57 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0870 | TP0702 | 2 | Conserved hypothetical protein (Borrelia burgdorferi) |
| TP0792 | (TP0764) | 87 | Conserved hypothetical protein (Borrelia burgdorferi) |
| TP0870 | (TP0764) | 87 | Conserved hypothetical protein (Borrelia burgdorferi) |
| TP0870 | (TP0788) | 63 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0792 | (TP0832) | 41 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0868 | (TP0832) | 41 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0870 | (TP0832) | 41 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0870 | (TP0870) | 59 | Flagellar filament 31-kDa core protein (flaB3) |
| TP0870 | TP0873 | 1 | Hypothetical protein |
| TP0870 | (TP0907) | 77 | Conserved hypothetical protein (Borrelia burgdorferi) |
| TP0870 | (TP0989) | 107 | P26 (Borrelia burgdorferi) |
| TP0870 | (TP0993) | 167 | Rare lipoprotein A, putative (Borrelia burgdorferi) |
Flagellin proteins tested as baits against the whole-genome prey library of T. pallidum. FlaB1 = TP0868, FlaB2 = TP792, FlaB3 = TP0870.
Preys identified with more than one flagellin are marked in boldface. Preys not reliably identified due to unspecific binding (binding to more than 5% of the tested baits) are shown in parentheses.
The bait count represents the number of unique baits a prey has been found with and thereby indicates nonspecific binding (numbers are based on 450 baits screened). For example, TP0005 has been found with 10 different baits, including TP0870.
Species names given after the prey description indicate the source of annotation for these proteins. *, TP0658 is most likely not a membrane protein since it is fairly well soluble (the misleading annotation appears to stem from a hydrophobic sequence in the middle of the protein).
TABLE 2.
Strains and plasmids
| B. subtilis strain or plasmid | Description and/or genotype | Source or reference |
|---|---|---|
| Strains | ||
| 168 | trpC2 | BGSCa |
| Δhag mutant | argF4 flaC51 hag-1 hisA1 ura | BGSC |
| Δmot mutant | (SPbc2) motA::Tn917 trpC2 | BGSC |
| ΔflgM mutant | flgMΔ80 pheA1 trpC2 | BGSC |
| Δupp mutant | Strain used for yviF deletion | 6 |
| ΔyviF mutant | yviF deletion by phleomycin-upp cassette integration (6) | This study |
| Plasmids | ||
| pDG148-Stu | Pspac regulated protein expression in B. subtilis | 11 |
| pDG-yviF | HA-tagged yviF cloned into pDG148-Stu | This study |
| pUniD/V5-His-TOPO | Entry vector for UPS system (14) | Invitrogen |
| pUniD-TP0561, -TP0658, -TP0711, -TP0792, -TP0868, and -TP0870 | T. pallidum ORFs cloned into pUniD/V5-His-TOPO | 16 |
| pUniD-yviF, -hag, and -yvzB | B. subtilis ORFs cloned into pUniD/V5-His-TOPO | This study |
| pUniD-hag-HA and pUniD-hag-N255A | Targeted mutations of the TP0658 binding site in Hag | This study |
| pMM110 | GST fusion protein expression in E. coli | 16 |
| GST-TP0658 and GST-yviF | pUniD constructs recombined with pMM110 | This study |
| pHB-HA3 | HA-tagged protein expression in E. coli | 14 |
| pHB-HA3-TP0561, -TP0711, -TP0792, -TP0868, -TP0870, -hag, -yvzB, -hag-HA, and -hag-N255A | pUniD constructs recombined with pHB-HA3 | This study |
| pAC28 and pEGST | Coexpression of proteins in E. coli | 12 |
BGSC, Bacillus Genetic Stock Center.
TABLE 3.
Primers used in this study
| Primer | Sequence |
|---|---|
| hagHAforward | TACGACGTCCCAGACTACGCTGTTGACATGGCTAAAGAGATGAG |
| hagHAreverse | AGCGTAGTCTGGGACGTCGTATGGGTAAATTGTGTGCTCTAGACGATTTTGTAC |
| hagN255Aforward | AGCGCTTCTGGTGAAGCTTTGACAGCTGCTGAG |
| hagN255Areverse | CTCAGCAGCTGTCAAAGCTTCACCAGAAGCGCT |
| yviF_forward | AATTCTCGAGGAATGATCATTCATACGAAGTA |
| yviF_reverse | AATTGAGCTCCTAGCATGATTCTCCTCCAA |
| hag_forward | AATTCTCGAGGAATGAGAATTAACCACAATAT |
| hag_reverse | AATTGAGCTCTTAACGTAATAATTGAAGTA |
| yvzB_forward | AATTCTCGAGGAATGGATGCGCTTATTGAGGA |
| yvzB_reverse | AATTGAGCTCTTAACGTAACAATTGAAGCA |
| pUniD_forward | CTATCAACAGGTTGAACTG |
| pUniD_reverse | CAGTCGAGGCTGATAGCGAGCT |
| L59reverse | GGTTGAGCTCAGAGGCCGCGGATTTGGCTGC |
| N60forward | TTGGCTCGAGGAAACCAGGCATCCACCAATGC |
| S141reverse | GGTTGAGCTCAGGAGAAGCGGCCCGTGAGCA |
| V118forward | TTGGCTCGAGGAGTGGCAGAGGTAGACCGCAT |
| S141reverse | GGTTGAGCTCAGGAGAAGCGGCCCGTGAGCA |
| I200forward | TTGGCTCGAGGAATCGGCACCATCGATGCTGC |
| L231forward | TTGGCTCGAGGACTTGACATCGCTGCGGAGAA |
| S199reverse | GGTTGAGCTCAGCTCTTGTTGGCCGAGTCTG |
| yviF_p1 | CATGGGTGTTGGAGGAAGG |
| yviF_p2 | AGTCGACCTGCAGGCATGCAAGCTGTTCTTCTTTTATGTTCATTTGGCC |
| yviF_p3 | CGAGCTCGAATTCACTGGCCGTCGTACCATGGCCAAATGAACATAAAAGAAGAAACAAAGCATCCGATTGGAGG |
| yviF_p4 | ATCGTTTATATCGACTAAGTCG |
| pHB-HA3_pDGforward | AAGGAGGAAGCAGGTATGGCAGGTTACCCATACGAC |
| pHB-HA3_pDGreverse | GACACGCACGAGGTCAGTCGAGGCTGATAGCGAGCT |
| TP0658_pEGSTforward | AATTGGATCCATGGAGATTCAGACGAAGACGC |
| TP0658_pEGSTreverse | AATTCTCGAGTCAACATTGTTCCTGCGCCCTTC |
| TP0868_pAC28forward | AATTGGATCCATGATTATCAATCACAACATGAG |
| TP0868_pAC28reverse | AATTGAGCTCCGGAGAATTGAGAGAATCGAC |
FIG. 1.
T. pallidum protein TP0658 and its B. subtilis ortholog YviF interact with flagellin proteins. (A) HA-tagged flagellin proteins of T. pallidum—TP0868 (FlaB1), TP0792 (FlaB2), and TP0870 (FlaB3)—were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells and the total lysate was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membrane was blocked and then incubated with 25 nM purified GST-TP0658 fusion protein (left panel) or 25 nM GST control protein (right panel). Detection of bound GST-protein (anti-GST antibody G1160; Sigma-Aldrich) and HA-tagged proteins (anti-HA antibody HA.11; Covance Research Products) was done by using standard Western blotting procedures. The proteins TP0567 and TP0711 are randomly chosen negative controls to exclude the nonspecific binding of TP0658. Probing with anti-HA (middle panel) and anti-GST antibodies (right panel) served as controls for expression levels and nonspecific binding, respectively. (B) HA-tagged flagellin proteins of T. pallidum (TP0792, TP0868, and TP0870) and B. subtilis (Hag and YvzB) were expressed in E. coli and tested for protein interactions with GST-tagged YviF (GST-yviF) in an overlay assay. The protein TP0567 was included as negative control. Probing with anti-HA and GST alone served as controls for expression levels and nonspecific binding, respectively. (C) Lysates of a B. subtilis wild-type strain (168) and of hag, motA, and flgM mutants (Table 2) were tested for proteins interacting with GST-yviF in an overlay assay. The molecular mass of the bands shown corresponds to Hag (∼31 kDa); total (t) and soluble (s) extracts are shown.
The interaction is conserved in Bacillus subtilis.
To test whether the protein interactions of TP0658 are conserved, we tested its ortholog in B. subtilis, YviF, with the two flagellin proteins of B. subtilis, Hag and YvzB. Hag is the full-length flagellin protein of B. subtilis, whereas YvzB represents an N terminally truncated form of unknown function. We PCR amplified the yviF gene from B. subtilis genomic DNA and expressed it as a GST fusion. The hag and yvzB genes of Bacillus subtilis were HA tagged by cloning them into the pHB-HA3 vector. The interactions between pHB-HA3-hag, pHB-HA3-yvzB, and GST-yviF were tested as described previously using an overlay assay that clearly showed that YviF interacts with both B. subtilis flagellin proteins (Fig. 1B). In addition, YviF binds to all three flagellin proteins of T. pallidum, suggesting that the interaction epitope is highly conserved even among distantly related species (Fig. 1B). Moreover, the interaction between YviF and Hag could be confirmed in an overlay assay using different B. subtilis deletion strains (Fig. 1C).
TP0658 and FliS bind to similar epitopes of flagellin.
Since the structure of flagellin is known (19), we mapped the TP0658 interaction epitope of the flagellin protein to get structural insight into the function of this interaction. First, we tested the systematic truncations of TP0868 (FlaB1) for the binding of GST-TP0658 in an overlay assay. Specific fragments of TP0868 were expressed as HA fusions (in vector pHB-HA3) and tested for GST-TP0658 binding. This overlay assay showed that TP0658 interacts with an epitope within the C-terminal 55 amino acids of TP0868 (L231-C terminus) (Fig. 2A and B). An interaction with the C-terminal half of flagellin is also supported by the interaction of yviF with the N-terminally truncated flagellin, yvzB (Fig. 1B), which is naturally lacking the region homologous to the first 110 amino acids of TP0868 (Fig. 2A). Strikingly, the TP0658 interaction epitope of FlaB1 is similar to the FliS-binding site in FliC: FliS binds to the C-terminal 40 amino acids of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium flagellin—the region implicated in the polymerization of flagellin (17). For a more detailed characterization of the interaction epitope, we synthesized the amino acid sequence of the C-terminal binding domain of TP0868 as overlapping 15-mer peptides on a cellulose membrane by using an automated spot synthesizer (7) (MultiPep, Intavis, Germany) and then probed them with GST-TP0658 (using the same conditions as in the overlay experiments). GST-TP0658 interacted with peptides that correspond to the sequence between L231 and D247 of TP0868 (Fig. 2A and C). A peptide comprising the interaction epitope sequence (VGL231DIAAENLQAAESRIRD247) was also able to inhibit the binding of TP0658 to all three T. pallidum flagellin proteins (Fig. 2D). In order to identify amino acids crucial for binding, we then systematically replaced each position of the previously identified peptide (V229GLDIAAENLQAAESRIRD247) with alanine and tested the resulting peptides for binding, showing that I233 and N237 of the previously identified interaction epitope are crucial for binding in this assay (Fig. 2E). For additional verification, the corresponding interaction epitope (Fig. 2A), N247NLSASGENLTAAESRIRD265 in B. subtilis Hag was replaced by an HA tag sequence. In a second construct, pUniD-hag-N255A, the asparagine residue at position 255 of Hag was replaced by alanine. This residue corresponds to N237 in TP0868 and was found to be crucial for TP0658 binding in the SPOT analysis; the second residue crucial for binding in the SPOT analysis, I233, is naturally exchanged by alanine in Hag, and it is assumed to have either a species-specific relevance or an indirect effect on binding by influencing the peptide's conformation in the spot analysis. Strikingly, an overlay of the two mutant proteins (in pHB-HA3) with GST-yviF showed the complete loss of binding (Fig. 2F), confirming the essentiality of Asn255 (Asn237 in TP0868) and demonstrating the evolutionary conservation of the interaction epitope in both T. pallidum and B. subtilis proteins.
FIG. 2.
TP0658/yviF binds to the C-terminal loop region of flagellin. (A) Schematic representation of TP0868 (FlaB1) fragments and results of interaction epitope mapping. The S. enterica serovar Typhimurium flagellin structure is shown (19); the primary sequence of TP0868 is color coded accordingly (not drawn to scale). (B) Eight fragments of TP0868 (T1 to T8) were tested for interactions with GST-658 in an overlay assay; positive and negative results for the fragments are indicated by ticks and crosses in panel A. The interaction region is indicated by a shaded box in panel A. (C) Corresponding sequence (L231-C terminus) as tested by peptide spotting. The sequence was synthesized as overlapping peptides of 15 amino acids with 1-amino-acid shifts directly onto a cellulose membrane. These peptides were tested for interactions with GST-658 or GST as a control. The first amino acid of each 15-mer peptide is shown above its spot. The last peptide is a positive control recognized by the anti-GST antibody. Only the first three peptides starting from L231 interacted, indicating an interaction epitope between L231 to D247. (D) In the upper panel, a 100 mM concentration of synthetic peptide of this epitope region (868-Pep) but not of a control peptide (DRRLADHFCGKIHCG) was able to inhibit the binding of GST-658 to all three flagellin proteins—FlaB1 (TP0868), FlaB2 (TP0792), and FlaB3 (TP0870)—in an overlay assay. The lower panel shows that the inhibitory effect of 868-Pep was concentration dependent (shown for TP0868, FlaB1). (E) An extended interaction peptide (V229-D247) was tested in an alanine scan showing that I233 and N237 are crucial for binding. The first and the last spots of the row show wild-type and antibody control sequences, respectively. The remaining peptide spots have the indicated amino acid replaced by alanine. Double dots (“..”) indicate positions not synthesized because of naturally occurring alanine residues at these positions (these peptides correspond to the wild-type sequence in position 1). (F) Mutants of the B. subtilis Hag binding epitope (i.e., B. subtilis flagellin) were tested for binding to YviF in an overlay assay. The construct hag-HA has the interaction epitope replaced by an HA tag. hag-N255A (N2A) has the crucial Asn255 residue (Asn237 in FlaB1/TP0868) replaced by alanine. Probing with GST protein and anti-HA antibodies served as controls. The interacting region in different flagellin orthologs is shown in the alignment in panel A, right panel: Treponema pallidum flagellins TP0792 (FlaB2), TP0868 (FlaB1), and TP0870 (FlaB3); Helicobacter pylori flagellins HP0115 (flagellin B) and HP0601 (flagellin A); Campylobacter jejuni flagellin CJ1338 (flagellin B); and Bacillus subtilis flagellins BSU35360 (Hag) and BSU35150 (YvzB).
yviF is required for motility.
A functional involvement of yviF in bacterial motility was tested by using a B. subtilis yviF deletion mutant. The ΔyviF strain was created by specific integration of a phleomycin-upp cassette into the yviF locus as described by Fabret et al. (6). The ΔyviF mutant showed a strong reduction of motility in a swarming assay (on LB plates with 0.25% agar) (Fig. 3). As expected, only IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside)-induced expression of yviF from a plasmid (pDG-yviF [11]) could rescue the motility phenotype, clearly proving that the reduced motility is due to the lack of the yviF gene in the ΔyviF mutant.
FIG. 3.
A yviF deletion mutant shows impaired motility. The B. subtilis ΔyviF mutant was tested in a swarming assay without (−IPTG) or with (+IPTG) induction of yviF expression from a plasmid (+yviF). B. subtilis cells transformed with the empty vector, pDG148-Stu, served as controls (+V). The ΔyviF mutant has a clear swarming defect that can be rescued by yviF expression.
A FliS mutant in E. coli could not be rescued by expressing TP0658 (data not shown). This suggests that the functions of the two proteins are not identical or that species-specific differences prevented a successful rescue.
TP0658 and its orthologs are new assembly factors of the flagellum.
Based on the similar interaction pattern of FliS and TP0658/yviF, both of which interact with the C terminus of flagellin (the region involved in the polymerization of flagellin), we hypothesized that TP0658/yviF might be a novel assembly factor for flagellin proteins. In fact, the deletion of yviF leads to a strong reduction in the amount of flagellin protein detected in B. subtilis cells (Fig. 4A); this is probably due to an inhibition of flagellin incorporation into the nascent filament and subsequent degradation. Strikingly, TP0658 appears to stabilize FlaB1 (TP0868) when coexpressed in E. coli from the vectors pEGST and pAC28 (12), respectively (Fig. 4B). Notably, the stabilization does not lead to solubilization of flagellin; possible explanations are a protective effect of TP0658 against proteases (as seen for FliS (17) or an involvement of TP0658 in a membrane (basal body complex)-associated assembly mechanism as proposed for the secretin pilot protein MxiM (see below) (13).
FIG. 4.
TP0658 and yviF stabilize flagellin. (A) B. subtilis strains were tested for flagellin (Hag) and YviF expression from a plasmid. Hag and HA-yviF were detected by a GST-yviF overlay and anti-HA antibodies, respectively. Wild-type (WT) and ΔyviF cells carrying an empty plasmid, pDG148-Stu (+V) or the yviF expression plasmid, pDG-yviF (+yviF), are compared. Flagellin can only be detected when yviF is present. (B) His-tagged TP0868 (FlaB1) and GST-tagged TP0658 (or GST) were coexpressed in E. coli. The expression was done overnight, relying on the basal expression levels of both constructs to obtain physiological more relevant expression levels. Total (t) and soluble (s) lysates were tested for the presence of protein. TP0868 (FlaB1) can only be detected when TP0658 is present; coexpression of TP0658 thus leads to TP0868 stabilization. Please note that stabilized TP0868 is not found in the soluble fraction, e.g., supporting a stabilization at the membrane (see the text).
Recently, the structure of BH3618, the Bacillus halodurans ortholog of TP0658, was determined by a Structural Genomics Project (PDB code 2AJ7). A type three secretion system (TTSS) component related to BH3618 by its somewhat similar structure is MxiM (PDB code LY9T), a secretin pilot protein functioning as an assembly factor in the periplasmic space. MxiM is thought to support the assembly of the MxiD polymer directly at the outer membrane by means of its interaction with the C-terminal part of its substrate MxiD. However, the evolutionary and functional relationships between BH3618 and MxiM need to be studied in more detail.
Conclusions.
Although two previous screens (10, 18) indicated a role of the TP0658 family of proteins in motility, neither was sufficient on its own to justify a reannotation of the protein. Here we provide additional evidence and synthesize all available information into a model that supports the classification of a whole cluster of orthologous genes (COG1699) as a novel family of flagellar assembly factors.
In summary, (i) TP0658/CJ1075 mutants have a motility defect (Fig. 3) (10), (ii) TP0658/yviF are located in flagellar operons, (iii) TP0658/yviF/CJ1075/HP1154/HP1377 bind to flagellin (18; R. Finley, unpublished data), (iv) both TP0658 and FliS bind to the C-terminal part of flagellin which is implicated in polymerization, and (v) TP0658/yviF stabilizes flagellin. TP0658 and its function thus seems to be widely conserved in bacteria (Fig. 5).
FIG. 5.
Conservation of TP0658 and functional relatives in bacteria. A phylogenetic tree (5) shows the presence of TP0658 and other flagellum-related chaperones: FliS is the main chaperone for flagellin (FliC); FliT is a chaperone for the filament capping protein FliD; FlgN is a chaperone for the hook-filament junction proteins FlgK and FlgL; and FliJ is a chaperone for rod and hook proteins (1, 2, 9, 20). FlgA is an assembly factor for the P-ring. TP0658 and flagellum-related chaperones are only found to simultaneously occur with FliC. Experimentally shown interactions between FliC and TP0658 are indicated by double-headed arrows (C. jejuni [R. Finley, unpublished data]; H. pylori [18]). Mutations of TP0658 homologs in B. subtilis and C. jejuni are known to have a motility phenotype (P) (C. jejuni [10]).
The molecular details of TP0658 activity remain unclear but are reminiscent of type III secretion chaperones such as the export chaperone FliS in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (1, 17). FliS binds to flagellin at the same epitope as TP0658 and appears to stabilize flagellin. However, since TP0658 also occurs in genomes with FliS (Fig. 5), it remains to be investigated whether these assembly factors act cooperatively or independently.
ADDENDUM IN PROOF
After consulting various experts we suggest renaming TP0658 and its orthologs FliW, reflecting its close genomic association with other fli genes as well as its association with the flagellar filament. Note that “W” appears to be the last available letter for the fli genes.
Acknowledgments
F. Denizot, S. Elledge, T. Mustelin, P. Noirot, and D. Zeigler kindly provided B. subtilis mutant strains and plasmids. We thank Olaf Zwernemann for the synthesis of peptides. Matthew T. McKevitt and Timothy Palzkill provided the pUni-ORFeome and the T. pallidum prey clones. Russ Finley provided unpublished data on CJ1075.
B.T. is a fellow of the Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes. This project was supported by DFG grant Ue50/4-1 to P.U.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 25 August 2006.
REFERENCES
- 1.Auvray, F., J. Thomas, G. M. Fraser, and C. Hughes. 2001. Flagellin polymerisation control by a cytosolic export chaperone. J. Mol. Biol. 308:221-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bennett, J. C., J. Thomas, G. M. Fraser, and C. Hughes. 2001. Substrate complexes and domain organization of the Salmonella flagellar export chaperones FlgN and FliT. Mol. Microbiol. 39:781-791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cagney, G., P. Uetz, and S. Fields. 2000. High-throughput screening for protein-protein interactions using two-hybrid assay. Methods Enzymol. 328:3-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Charon, N. W., and S. F. Goldstein. 2002. Genetics of motility and chemotaxis of a fascinating group of bacteria: the spirochetes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36:47-73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Daubin, V., M. Gouy, and G. Perrière. 2002. A phylogenomic approach to bacterial phylogeny: evidence of a core of genes sharing a common history. Genome Res. 12:1080-1090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fabret, C., S. D. Ehrlich, and P. Noirot. 2002. A new mutation delivery system for genome-scale approaches in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 46:25-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Frank, R. 1992. Spot synthesis: an easy technique for the positionally addressable, parallel chemical synthesis on a membrane support. Tetrahedron 48:9217-9232. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fraser, C. M., S. J. Norris, G. M. Weinstock, O. White, G. G. Sutton, R. Dodson, M. Gwinn, E. K. Hickey, R. Clayton, K. A. Ketchum, E. Sodergren, J. M. Hardham, M. P. McLeod, S. Salzberg, J. Peterson, H. Khalak, D. Richardson, J. K. Howell, M. Chidambaram, T. Utterback, L. McDonald, P. Artiach, C. Bowman, M. D. Cotton, J. C. Venter, et al. 1998. Complete genome sequence of Treponema pallidum, the syphilis spirochete. Science 281:375-388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fraser, G. M., J. C. Bennett, and C. Hughes. 1999. Substrate-specific binding of hook-associated proteins by FlgN and FliT, putative chaperones for flagellum assembly. Mol. Microbiol. 32:569-580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Golden, N. J., and D. W. Acheson. 2002. Identification of motility and autoagglutination Campylobacter jejuni mutants by random transposon mutagenesis. Infect. Immun. 70:1761-1771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Joseph, P., J. R. Fantino, M. L. Herbaud, and F. Denizot. 2001. Rapid orientated cloning in a shuttle vector allowing modulated gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 205:91-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kholod, N., and T. Mustelin. 2001. Novel vectors for coexpression of two proteins in Escherichia coli. BioTechniques 31:322-328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lario, P. I., R. A. Pfuetzner, E. A. Frey, L. Creagh, C. Haynes, A. T. Maurelli, and N. C. Strynadka. 2005. Structure and biochemical analysis of a secretin pilot protein. EMBO J. 24:1111-1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu, Q., M. Z. Li, D. Liu, and S. J. Elledge. 2000. Rapid construction of recombinant DNA by the univector plasmid-fusion system. Methods Enzymol. 328:530-549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Macnab, R. M. 2003. How bacteria assemble flagella. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57:77-100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McKevitt, M., K. Patel, D. Smajs, M. Marsh, M. McLoughlin, S. J. Norris, G. M. Weinstock, and T. Palzkill. 2003. Systematic cloning of Treponema pallidum open reading frames for protein expression and antigen discovery. Genome Res. 13:1665-1674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ozin, A. J., L. Claret, F. Auvray, and C. Hughes. 2003. The FliS chaperone selectively binds the disordered flagellin C-terminal D0 domain central to polymerisation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 219:219-224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rain, J. C., L. Selig, H. De Reuse, V. Battaglia, C. Reverdy, S. Simon, G. Lenzen, F. Petel, J. Wojcik, V. Schachter, Y. Chemama, A. Labigne, and P. Legrain. 2001. The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature 409:211-215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Samatey, F. A., K. Imada, S. Nagashima, F. Vonderviszt, T. Kumasaka, M. Yamamoto, and K. Namba. 2001. Structure of the bacterial flagellar protofilament and implications for a switch for supercoiling. Nature 410:331-337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yokoseki, T., K. Kutsukake, K. Ohnishi, and T. Iino. 1995. Functional analysis of the flagellar genes in the fliD operon of Salmonella typhimurium. Microbiology 141(Pt. 7):1715-1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





