Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1996 Dec;40(12):2904–2906. doi: 10.1128/aac.40.12.2904

Activities against Streptococcus pneumoniae of amoxicillin and cefotaxime at physiological concentrations: in vitro pharmacodynamic simulation.

I P Balcabao 1, L Aguilar 1, M Martín 1, Y García 1, R Dal-Ré 1, J Prieto 1
PMCID: PMC163647  PMID: 9124866

Abstract

An in vitro model simulating amoxicillin and cefotaxime concentrations in human serum (after standard doses) was used to explore the activities of these drugs over time against penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains. An initial inoculum reduction percentage of > or = 90% was obtained with amoxicillin and maintained for 2 to 8 h, regardless of the strain tested. In contrast, experiments showed that cefotaxime had significantly (P < 0.001) less capability to reduce initial inocula of the penicillin-resistant pneumococci from 0.5 h on than amoxicillin, despite the same in vitro susceptibility to amoxicillin and cefotaxime in both strains.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (183.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Appelbaum P. C. Antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: an overview. Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Jul;15(1):77–83. doi: 10.1093/clinids/15.1.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fraschini F., Scaglione F., Falchi M., Dugnani S., Mezzetti M., Cicchetti F., Alfano G., Pintucci G. P. Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid after oral administration in man. J Chemother. 1990 Jun;2(3):171–177. doi: 10.1080/1120009x.1990.11739013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Friedland I. R., McCracken G. H., Jr Management of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 11;331(6):377–382. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408113310607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mattie H. Kinetics of antimicrobial action. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 Jan-Feb;3(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/clinids/3.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pallares R., Liñares J., Vadillo M., Cabellos C., Manresa F., Viladrich P. F., Martin R., Gudiol F. Resistance to penicillin and cephalosporin and mortality from severe pneumococcal pneumonia in Barcelona, Spain. N Engl J Med. 1995 Aug 24;333(8):474–480. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508243330802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Soriano F., Ponte C., Nieto E., Parra A. Correlation of in-vitro activity and pharmacokinetic parameters with in-vivo effect of amoxycillin, co-amoxiclav and cefotaxime in a murine model of pneumococcal pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Aug;38(2):227–236. doi: 10.1093/jac/38.2.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wise R., Baker S., Livingston R. Comparison of cefotaxime and moxalactam pharmacokinetics and tissue levels. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Sep;18(3):369–371. doi: 10.1128/aac.18.3.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES