Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1997 Jan;41(1):30–34. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.1.30

T-8581, a new orally and parenterally active triazole antifungal agent: in vitro and in vivo evaluations.

A Yotsuji 1, K Shimizu 1, H Araki 1, K Fujimaki 1, N Nishida 1, R Hori 1, N Annen 1, S Yamamoto 1, H Hayakawa 1, H Imaizumi 1, Y Watanbe 1, H Narita 1
PMCID: PMC163655  PMID: 8980750

Abstract

T-8581 is a new water-soluble triazole antifungal agent. The geometric mean IC80s (GM-IC80S; where the IC80 is the lowest drug concentration which reduced the optical density at 630 nm by 80% compared with the optical density at 630 nm of the drug-free control) for Candida albicans were as follows: T-8581, 0.218 microgram/ml; fluconazole; 0.148 microgram/ml; and itraconazole, 0.0170 microgram/ml. For Cryptococcus neoformans the GM-IC80s were as follows: T-8581, 9.28 micrograms/ml; fluconazole, 4.00 micrograms/ml; and itraconazole, 0.119 microgram/ml. For Aspergillus fumigatus the GM-IC80s were as follows: T-8581, 71.0 micrograms/ml; fluconazole, 239 micrograms/ml; and itraconazole, 0.379 microgram/ml. Against systemic candidiasis in mice, the 50% effective doses (ED50s) of T-8581, fluconazole, and itraconazole (given orally) were 0.412, 0.392, and > 320 mg/kg of body weight, respectively. Against systemic aspergillosis in mice, the ED50s of T-8581, fluconazole, and itraconazole (given orally) were 50.5, 138, > 320 mg/kg, respectively. T-8581 was also efficacious when it was given parenterally (ED50, 59.2 mg/kg), while the ED50 of fluconazole given parenterally was > 20 mg/kg. Against systemic aspergillosis in rabbits, T-8581 was more effective than fluconazole and itraconazole in prolonging the life span. The high concentrations of T-8581 were observed in the sera of mice, rats, rabbits and dogs. Species differences in half-lives and areas under the concentration-time curves were observed, with the values for mice, rats, rabbits, and dogs increasing in that order. These results suggest that T-8581 would be a potentially effective antifungal drug for oral and parenteral use.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (195.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akova M., Akalin H. E., Uzun O., Gür D. Emergence of Candida krusei infections after therapy of oropharyngeal candidiasis with fluconazole. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Jul;10(7):598–599. doi: 10.1007/BF01967286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baily G. G., Perry F. M., Denning D. W., Mandal B. K. Fluconazole-resistant candidosis in an HIV cohort. AIDS. 1994 Jun;8(6):787–792. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199406000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Espinel-Ingroff A., Dawson K., Pfaller M., Anaissie E., Breslin B., Dixon D., Fothergill A., Paetznick V., Peter J., Rinaldi M. Comparative and collaborative evaluation of standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing for filamentous fungi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Feb;39(2):314–319. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.2.314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fan-Havard P., Capano D., Smith S. M., Mangia A., Eng R. H. Development of resistance in candida isolates from patients receiving prolonged antifungal therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Nov;35(11):2302–2305. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.11.2302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fromtling R. A. Overview of medically important antifungal azole derivatives. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988 Apr;1(2):187–217. doi: 10.1128/cmr.1.2.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Graybill J. R. New antifungal agents. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 May;8(5):402–412. doi: 10.1007/BF01964056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hay R. J. Antifungal therapy and the new azole compounds. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Jul;28 (Suppl A):35–46. doi: 10.1093/jac/28.suppl_a.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hay R. J. Overview of the treatment of disseminated fungal infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Oct;28 (Suppl B):17–25. doi: 10.1093/jac/28.suppl_b.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hector R. F., Yee E. Evaluation of Bay R 3783 in rodent models of superficial and systemic candidiasis, meningeal cryptococcosis, and pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Mar;34(3):448–454. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.3.448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heel R. C., Brogden R. N., Pakes G. E., Speight T. M., Avery G. S. Miconazole: a preliminary review of its therapeutic efficacy in systemic fungal infections. Drugs. 1980 Jan;19(1):7–30. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198019010-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heel R. C., Brogden R. N., Speight T. M., Avery G. S. Econazole: a review of its antifungal activity and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1978 Sep;16(3):177–201. doi: 10.2165/00003495-197816030-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hitchcock C. A., Pye G. W., Troke P. F., Johnson E. M., Warnock D. W. Fluconazole resistance in Candida glabrata. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Sep;37(9):1962–1965. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.9.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Humphrey M. J., Jevons S., Tarbit M. H. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of UK-49,858, a metabolically stable triazole antifungal drug, in animals and humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Nov;28(5):648–653. doi: 10.1128/aac.28.5.648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Law D., Moore C. B., Wardle H. M., Ganguli L. A., Keaney M. G., Denning D. W. High prevalence of antifungal resistance in Candida spp. from patients with AIDS. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Nov;34(5):659–668. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.5.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lyman C. A., Walsh T. J. Systemically administered antifungal agents. A review of their clinical pharmacology and therapeutic applications. Drugs. 1992 Jul;44(1):9–35. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199244010-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Patterson T. F., Miniter P., Andriole V. T. Efficacy of fluconazole in experimental invasive aspergillosis. Rev Infect Dis. 1990 Mar-Apr;12 (Suppl 3):S281–S285. doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.supplement_3.s281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rex J. H., Pfaller M. A., Barry A. L., Nelson P. W., Webb C. D. Antifungal susceptibility testing of isolates from a randomized, multicenter trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B as treatment of nonneutropenic patients with candidemia. NIAID Mycoses Study Group and the Candidemia Study Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Jan;39(1):40–44. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.1.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Saag M. S., Dismukes W. E. Azole antifungal agents: emphasis on new triazoles. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Jan;32(1):1–8. doi: 10.1128/aac.32.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Troke P. F., Andrews R. J., Marriott M. S., Richardson K. Efficacy of fluconazole (UK-49,858) against experimental aspergillosis and cryptococcosis in mice. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 May;19(5):663–670. doi: 10.1093/jac/19.5.663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES