Abstract
Three important issues impinge on estimating the risk of cancer to a population: (1) How can one use epidemiologic studies on one population to tell us what is likely to happen to other populations? (2) How can one use nonhuman data (i.e., laboratory experiments) to tell us what is likely to happen to humans? (3) What reasonable assumptions can be used to guide the logical extension of information from the laboratory to expectations for man, and what research is needed to support or modify these assumptions? Four principles currently guide our laboratory-to-man extrapolations: effects in animals, properly qualified, are applicable to man; methods do not now exist to establish a threshold for long-delayed effects such as cancer; the exposure of experimental animals to high doses is a necessary and valid method of discovering possible carcinogenic hazards in man; materials should be assessed in terms of human risk rather than as "safe" or "unsafe".
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ARLEY N., IVERSEN S. On the mechanism of experimental carcinogenesis. VI. Hit theoretical interpretation of some experiments of Berenblum & Shubik. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1952;31(2):164–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ARMITAGE P., DOLL R. A two-stage theory of carcinogenesis in relation to the age distribution of human cancer. Br J Cancer. 1957 Jun;11(2):161–169. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1957.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BURCH P. R. Radiation carcinogenesis: a new hypothesis. Nature. 1960 Jan 16;185:135–142. doi: 10.1038/185135a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crump K. S., Hoel D. G., Langley C. H., Peto R. Fundamental carcinogenic processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment. Cancer Res. 1976 Sep;36(9 PT1):2973–2979. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FISHER J. C., HOLLOMON J. H. A hypothesis for the origin of cancer foci. Cancer. 1951 Sep;4(5):916–918. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195109)4:5<916::aid-cncr2820040504>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones H. Dose--effect relationships in carcinogenesis and the matter of threshold of carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perspect. 1978 Feb;22:171–172. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7822171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kellermann G., Shaw C. R., Luyten-Kellerman M. Aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase inducibility and bronchogenic carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1973 Nov 1;289(18):934–937. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197311012891802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MANTEL N., BRYAN W. R. "Safety" testing of carcinogenic agents. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1961 Aug;27:455–470. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MANTEL N., HESTON W. E., GURIAN J. M. Thresholds in linear dose-response models for carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1961 Jul;27:203–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NORDLING C. O. A new theory on cancer-inducing mechanism. Br J Cancer. 1953 Mar;7(1):68–72. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1953.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robbins J. H., Kraemer K. H., Lutzner M. A., Festoff B. W., Coon H. G. Xeroderma pigmentosum. An inherited diseases with sun sensitivity, multiple cutaneous neoplasms, and abnormal DNA repair. Ann Intern Med. 1974 Feb;80(2):221–248. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-80-2-221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- STOCKS P. A study of the age curve for cancer of the stomach in connection with a theory of the cancer producing mechanism. Br J Cancer. 1953 Dec;7(4):407–417. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1953.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terracini B., Magee P. N., Barnes J. M. Hepatic pathology in rats on low dietary levels of dimethylnitrosamine. Br J Cancer. 1967 Sep;21(3):559–565. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1967.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]