Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1978 Feb;22:103–105. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7822103

Assumption of linearity in dose--effect relationships.

E E Pochin
PMCID: PMC1637151  PMID: 648471

Abstract

As a basis for establishing radiation protection standards, a substantial amount of quantitative information is now available on the frequency with which malignant diseases are induced in man by moderately high doses of radiation. Such estimates can now be made not only for irradiation of the whole body but also for exposure of a number of body organs individually. The frequency with which cancers might follow the much lower doses involved in occupational or environmental exposure to radiation, however, cannot be derived from any available epidemiological surveys. It can at present only be inferred by the (probably pessimistic) assumption that the frequency of such effects is linearly proportional to the size of dose received, even down to the lowest doses. Increasing information as to the probable form of the actual dose--effect relationship for radiation is indicating the extent to which the use of this "linear hypothesis" may overestimate the risk of low doses as inferred from the observed risk of higher doses. A linear hypothesis has been used in the same way for estimating the likely frequency of harm from low doses of chemical substances which have defined harmful effects at high dose. The appropriateness of this procedure depends critically upon the way in which chemical pollutants, or the relevant products of their metabolism in the body, are likely to become distributed through body tissues and cause the relevant harmful effects on cells.

Full text

PDF
103

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOND V. P., SHELLABARGER C. J., CRONKITE E. P., FLIEDNER T. M. Studies on radiation-induced mammary gland neoplasia in the rat. 5. Induction by localized irradiation. Radiat Res. 1960 Aug;13:318–328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown J. M. Linearity vs non-linearity of dose response for radiation carcinogenesis. Health Phys. 1976 Sep;31(3):231–245. doi: 10.1097/00004032-197609000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CATER D. B., BASERGA R., LISCO H. Studies on the induction of bone and soft tissue tumours in rats by gamma irradiation and the effect of growth hormone and thyroxine. Br J Cancer. 1959 Jun;13:214–227. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1959.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clapp N. K., Darden E. B., Jr, Jernigan M. C. Relative effects of whole-body sublethal doses of 60-MeV protons and 300-kVp X-rays on disease incidences in RF mice. Radiat Res. 1974 Jan;57(1):158–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rossi H. H., Kellerer A. M. Radiation carcinogenesis at low doses. Science. 1972 Jan 14;175(4018):200–202. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4018.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES