Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2006 Oct 23;103(44):16101–16104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605201103

Liquid–crystalline aqueous clay suspensions

Laurent J Michot *,, Isabelle Bihannic *, Solange Maddi *, Sérgio S Funari , Christophe Baravian §, Pierre Levitz , Patrick Davidson
PMCID: PMC1637543  PMID: 17060625

Abstract

This article demonstrates the occurrence of a true isotropic/nematic transition in colloidal Brownian aqueous suspensions of natural nontronite clay. The liquid–crystalline character is further evidenced by polarized light microscopy and small-angle x-ray scattering experiments in the presence and absence of modest external magnetic fields. The complete phase diagram ionic strength/volume fraction then exhibits a clear biphasic domain in the sol region just before the gel transition in contrast with the situation observed for other swelling clays in which the sol/gel transition hinders the isotropic/nematic transition. Small-angle x-ray scattering measurements of gel samples reveal strong positional and orientational orders of the particles, proving unambiguously the nematic character of the gel and, thus, clearly refuting the still prevalent “house of cards” model, which explains the gel structure by means of attractive interactions between clay platelets. Such order also is observed in various other swelling clay minerals; therefore, this very general behavior must be taken into account to reach a better understanding of the rheological properties and phase behavior of these systems.

Keywords: colloids, liquid crystal, phase transitions


Swelling clay minerals are layered compounds that bear a negative layer charge compensated by interlayer exchangeable cations whose valence and hydration properties control both swelling and colloidal behavior. One of the most important properties of swelling clay minerals is their ability to form yield stress materials when dispersed in water. This feature, extensively used in various industrial applications (drilling fluids, food industry, cosmetic industry, etc.), also plays a major role in many fundamental processes occurring at the Earth's surface, such as slipping processes in plate-boundary faults (14) or landslide triggering (59). For these reasons, numerous studies have focused on the rheology of aqueous clay suspensions with particular emphasis on yield stress, thixotropy, and aging (1015). However, most studies neglect a key feature of clay minerals, i.e., their anisotropic shape. Actually, due to their high aspect ratio typically ranging between 25 and 1,000, these materials should very likely form liquid–crystalline phases (16), such as those observed for rod-like clay particles, such as imogolite in aqueous media (17), or organophilic sepiolite clay particles in nonaqueous solvents (18). A phase transition was indeed observed by Langmuir (19, **) as early as 1938 in suspensions of natural hectorite swelling clay. However, all subsequent studies failed to reproduce this crucial observation and give evidence of a clear thermodynamic liquid–crystalline order but instead revealed a dominant gel formation (20). Such behavior is observed for both highly polydisperse natural samples (21) and synthetic monodisperse ones (22). The structure and formation mechanisms of the gel are still under debate. Indeed, although some of the gel features indicate nematic ordering (23, 24), no true thermodynamic nematic order was ever clearly evidenced.†† In this manuscript, we show that aqueous suspensions of natural clay minerals can really exhibit a true isotropic/nematic transition, that the nematic phase displays strong orientational order, and that it can be aligned in modest magnetic fields, a distinctive feature of liquid–crystalline phases.

Results and Discussion

The clay mineral used in this study is a nontronite from Southern Australia (25). Nontronite is a naturally occurring swelling dioctahedral clay mineral related to the montmorillonite-beidellite series in which most aluminum atoms are replaced by iron (III) ions. The structural formula of the nontronite used in the present study was recently refined (26) as (Si7.55Al0.16Fe0.29) (Al0.34Fe3.54Mg0.05) O20(OH)4 Na0.72. Based on unit-cell parameters, its density can be estimated at ≈3.0 g/cm3. After purification and size fractionation, four different fractions were obtained. The results presented in this report deal with the third size fraction in which the elementary lath-shaped nontronite particles have an average length and width of 147 and 52 nm with standard deviations of 40% and 38%, respectively. Suspensions prepared with this size fraction are stable over years, whereas in higher size fractions sedimentation starts occurring after a few weeks, which affects the phase diagram (27). Naked-eye observations in polarized light of vials filled with suspensions of increasing volume fractions (at a fixed ionic strength of 10−4 M) reveal the following features. (i) At volume fractions φ < 0.6%, the suspensions are isotropic liquids (Fig. 1a) and exhibit flow birefringence for φ ≥ 0.2%. (ii) At 0.6% < φ < 0.8%, the suspensions are biphasic with a clear phase separation between a denser birefringent phase at the bottom and an isotropic one at the top (Fig. 1 b–d%). As expected, the proportion of birefringent phase gradually increases with the overall clay volume fraction. It must be emphasized that this observation represents a clear-cut and reproducible instance of isotropic/nematic phase separation in aqueous suspensions of natural clay minerals. In contrast with all previous studies, these clay suspensions then reach the isotropic/nematic transition line at thermodynamic equilibrium before gelling. (iii) At φ ≥ 0.83%, the suspensions are birefringent gels (Fig. 1e), which means that the sol/gel transition actually occurs at a volume fraction only slightly larger than the nematic edge (0.8%) of the biphasic region. The phase separation is also readily observed by polarized light microscopy (Fig. 1f). A few weeks after sample preparation, birefringent droplets are clearly visible in the top isotropic phase; they slowly sediment and coalesce to form the nematic phase. The phase separation is complete after a few months. Similar phenomena are observed with nontronites of size 4. This nematic phase displays a typical threaded texture, and the detection of flickering reveals that the suspensions are Brownian.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Visual observations of the isotropic/nematic transition in nontronite aqueous solutions. (a–e%) Naked-eye observation of the samples. Vials (2 ml) were filled with aqueous suspensions of sodium nontronite (ionic strength = 10−4 M) and observed between crossed polarizers (the isotropic phase in a–d% appears dark). (a) Isotropic liquid sample at a volume fraction φ = 0.5%. (The small bright line observed at the bottom of the vial is due to a reflection on the curved bottom.) (b) Onset of the phase separation at φ = 0.61%. (c) Biphasic sample at φ = 0.67%. (d) Biphasic sample at φ = 0.72%. (e) Birefringent gel at φ = 1%. (f) Polarized-light optical microscopy observations of a nontronite sample (φ = 0.7%, ionic strength = 10−3 M) at the onset of phase separation. (g and h) Polarized-light optical microscopy observations of a biphasic sample of a nontronite suspension (φ = 0.7%, ionic strength = 10−3 M) held in a flat capillary submitted to a horizontal 1-T magnetic field. White arrows indicate the directions of the polarizers. I, isotropic phase; N, nematic phase. (g) Extinction conditions. The capillary is barely visible because its axis is parallel to that of the polarizer. (h) Maximum transmission conditions. The nematic phase is almost uniformly bright because there are only very few defects left. The isotropic phase is not dark because of its large magnetic-field-induced anisotropy. (i) Transient hydrodynamic instability observed upon a sudden change of magnetic field direction for a nontronite suspension (φ = 0.7%, ionic strength = 10−3 M) held in a flat capillary.

Because of the presence of ferric iron in the octahedral layer, nontronite suspensions are fairly sensitive to magnetic fields, as shown by Fig. 1 g and h, which illustrates the strong alignment of the nematic phase submitted to a 1-T magnetic field. This interesting feature, typical of liquid–crystalline phases, proves that this nematic sample is a fluid rather than a gel of appreciable yield stress. The magnetic field can even be used to micropattern the orientation of the clay platelets by exploiting a classical transient hydrodynamic instability observed upon a sudden change of field direction (Fig. 1i) (28). The period of the modulation can easily be tuned by adjusting the magnetic field intensity.

A similar evolution with volume fraction also is obtained for an ionic strength of 10−3 M. In contrast, at 5.10−3 M, no phase separation was observed, and the system evolves directly from isotropic liquid to birefringent gel. The complete phase diagram of this nontronite size fraction is presented in Fig. 2. At low ionic strength, the biphasic domain is tilted toward larger volume fractions (29), revealing that the system is dominated by repulsions. In contrast, at higher salt concentrations, the sol–gel transition line displays a negative slope and crosses the biphasic region. Such a shape is similar to what was observed in the case of laponite (22). The complete phase diagram where the sol–gel line meets the flocculation line at high ionic strength suggests that this evolution is likely related to microflocculation processes. The shape of rheological flow-curve measurements confirms this interpretation because the viscosity of liquid samples, at high ionic strength, increases at low shear stress. Furthermore, in this region of the phase diagram, significant aging effects are observed, which once again can be linked to microflocculation events that clearly deserve further investigation.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Phase diagram of sodium nontronite suspensions. Upon increasing volume fraction, the suspensions first form an isotropic liquid (IL), then enter a biphasic regime (B) followed by a small region of nematic sol (NS), and finally form birefringent gels. The line between gel and liquid was determined by oscillatory shear measurements. At high salt concentration, the presence of flocs (F) was checked out by visual observation.

On the basis of published statistical physics models and numerical simulations, neglecting polydispersity and electrostatic effects, and considering an average particle diameter of ≈100 nm, a rough estimated value of ≈2% can be obtained for the volume fraction corresponding to the isotropic/nematic transition (30). Despite such crude simplifications, this predicted value compares rather well with the experimental one (0.6–0.8%). Because models and simulations are based on excluded-volume particle interactions only, the experiments reported here strongly suggest that attractive forces, often mentioned to describe clay suspensions, are irrelevant for the onset of nematic ordering at low ionic strength.

The structures of the suspensions were further analyzed by small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments. Very dilute isotropic suspensions showed a scattering intensity, I, monotonously decreasing with increasing scattering vector modulus, q, as Iq−2, proving the bidimensional nature of the scattering objects. At larger volume fractions, SAXS patterns display correlation peaks due to the short-range positional (i.e., “liquid-like”) order of the clay platelets. Typical patterns obtained from the isotropic and birefringent parts of a biphasic sample, are presented in Fig. 3 a and b. The anisotropic character of the birefringent phase is visible and, together with the absence of sharp Bragg reflections, proves its nematic nature. However, the pattern of Fig. 3b indicates a very poorly aligned “powder” sample, with a distribution of almost randomly oriented nematic domains. In contrast, when submitted to a magnetic field (Fig. 3c), in agreement with optical observations (Fig. 1g), the anisotropy of the SAXS pattern is very pronounced, revealing a very strong orientation of nontronite particles. The diffuse-peak positions (d) are the same for both the powder and aligned nematic phases with distances, d, of ≈70 nm between clay platelets. In the gel phase (Fig. 3d), highly anisotropic SAXS patterns were recorded from samples aligned by shear-flow achieved when the suspensions were gently centrifuged into the capillaries.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

SAXS studies. (a) Two-dimensional SAXS pattern of the isotropic phase of a nontronite suspension (φ = 0.7%, ionic strength = 10−3 M) (b) SAXS pattern of the nematic phase of the same suspension. (c) SAXS pattern of the nematic phase of the same suspension aligned in a magnetic field of 1 T. (d) SAXS pattern of a gel sample (φ = 3%, ionic strength = 10−3 M). (e) Plots of I·q2 vs. q corresponding to patterns a, b, and d. For patterns a and b, the first diffuse peak is too close to the beamstop and is not observed. The intensity of pattern d was divided by 2 for enhanced readability.

The evolution of d with inverse volume fraction (Fig. 4a) displays a first regime, for φ > 1.1%, where d is proportional to 1/φ. Such behavior (d = t/φ, where t is the layer thickness) is typical of the one-dimensional swelling of a pure lamellar phase (31) and therefore suggests a strong lamellar local order of the platelets in the nematic phase. The slope obtained in this regime is t = 0.70 ± 0.05 nm, a value very close to the thickness of a single clay sheet (0.8 nm), proving that the layers are perfectly exfoliated in suspension. The nematic phase then appears as resulting from the orientation of individual charged clay platelets, which is different from the situation encountered for positively charged layered double hydroxides (32), where a phase transition was observed for much thicker stacks of platelets. The linear regime, observed in the nematic phase, ends close to the limit of the biphasic region. There, a crossover occurs toward another regime at lower volume fraction (33), where the distance scales as φ−1/3, suggesting isotropic volume swelling.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Plots of the average interparticle distances versus inverse volume fraction. The straight line corresponds to one-dimensional swelling, d = t/φ, where t ≈ 0.7 nm is the thickness of a single clay sheet. (a) Nontronite suspensions. (b) Suspensions of montmorillonites from Arizona, Milos, and Wyoming.

Such an evolution of distance versus volume fraction is not specific to nontronite but also is observed for all of the size-fractionated swelling clays of similar size that we have investigated [Milos (Greece), Arizona, and Wyoming montmorillonites], which points to a very general behavior of smectites in terms of positional short-range order (Fig. 4b). The clear-cut evidence of a first-order isotropic/nematic transition in nontronite suspensions, reported here, therefore strongly suggests that the birefringence of smectite clay gels is indeed the sign of long-range orientational order. In this context, at volume fractions larger than ≈1%, the shear-thinning, nonlinear rheological properties of clay suspensions should be discussed in relation to their nematic order and not according to the house of cards models that assumes a connected network of interacting clay platelets. Such a feature must then definitely be taken into account for any future modeling of the rheological behavior of clay minerals suspensions both for industrial applications and natural processes.

A puzzling issue is how clay particle properties (dimensions, polydispersity, electric charge, flexibility, etc.) control gelation or liquid–crystalline formation. In the case of the nontronite used in this study, upon increasing volume fraction, the isotropic/nematic transition is observed before gelation, whereas suspensions of other clay minerals exhibit gelation before any phase transition takes place. The behavior of nontronite might be assigned to its lath-shape, and further model calculations and simulations are needed to explore in detail such an assumption. In any case, besides their relevance to the understanding of the rheological behavior of swelling clay minerals, the features revealed in the present paper should strongly contribute to improve our knowledge of the phase behavior of charged anisotropic colloids.

Materials and Methods

For clay preparation, the clay sample was ground, exchanged three times in 1 M NaCl, and washed by dialysis using ultrapure water until a conductivity of <5 μS was obtained. The suspensions were then placed in Imhoff cones for 24 h to discard the major mineralogical impurities (mainly iron oxide and feldspar). Size fractionation procedures were then applied by centrifuging the stock suspension under different gravitational fields (7,000 × g, 17,000 × g, and 35,000 × g). The supernatant obtained after centrifugation at the highest speed was concentrated by rotoevaporation. Using such a procedure, four size fractions referred to as sizes 1–4 were obtained. Mineralogical purity was checked by x-ray diffraction and infrared spectrometry, whereas sizes were determined by transmission electron microscopy. The average length and width of sizes 1–4 were 700 and 140 nm, 360 and 90 nm, 150 and 50 nm, and 100 and 45 nm, with polydispersities of 50%, 40%, 38%, and 35%, respectively. The same procedure was applied to montmorillonite samples from Arizona, Milos, and Wyoming. Their respective structural formulae can be written as (Si7.95,Al0.05)(Al2.85, Mg1.07, Fe0.17)O20(OH)4 Na1.11, (Si7.74,Al0.26)(Al3.0, Mg0.54, Fe0.46)O20(OH)4 Na0.79, and (Si7.76,Al0.24)(Al3.06, Mg0.48, Fe0.46)O20(OH)4 Na0.77. The respective average sizes of the samples described in the present study (size 3) are 50, 55, and 75 nm, and the sheets exhibit very irregular shapes.

Samples at different volume fractions were prepared by osmotic stress using either dextran or polyethyleneglycol solutions and dialysis membranes (Visking, London, U.K.) with a cut-off value of 14,000 Da. Ionic strength was fixed in the reservoir to avoid problems related to the Donnan effect.

Rheological measurements were carried out on a TA 2000 instrument. Oscillatory shear measurements were performed to determine the elastic (G′) and viscous (G″) modulus of the sample, which were further used to locate the mechanical transition between sol and soft solid, the limit being taken when G′ ≈ G″. Additional flow measurements were also carried out in controlled shear-rate mode.

Most SAXS experiments were carried out on beamline A2 at HASYLAB by using a fixed wavelength of 0.15 nm and a sample to detector distance of 3 m. Bidimensional scattering patterns were collected on a CCD camera, and the curve intensities vs. q (q = 4πsinθ/λ, where 2θ is the scattering angle and λ the wavelength) were obtained by integrating the data in the direction of the anisotropic pattern. Additional SAXS experiments were performed with an in-house setup, using a wavelength of 0.154 nm, a sample to detector distance of 1 m, and a 1-T permanent magnet. All samples were held in cylindrical Lindeman glass capillaries with diameters of 1 mm.

Polarized-light microscopy observations were performed with an Olympus (Tokyo, Japan) microscope, and the samples were held in flat glass capillaries (Vitrocom, Mountain Lakes, NJ).

Acknowledgments

Beam time at HASYLAB was supported by the European Community Research Infrastructure Action under FP6 “Structuring the European Research Area” Program Contract RII3-CT-2004-506008 (through the Integrated Infrastructure Initiative “Integrating Activity on Synchrotron and Free Electron Laser Science”).

Abbreviation

SAXS

small-angle x-ray scattering.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS direct submission.

**

In a footnote (p. 877) in his original paper (19), Langmuir clearly mentions that the phase separation was nonreproducible. Furthermore, some of the features of the phase transition observed by Langmuir are a bit awkward. Indeed, the transition appears within the gel phase, with the isotropic phase separating out of the birefringent material. Furthermore, the relative proportion of isotropic phase increases with the total concentration, which is the contrary to what should be observed in the case of an isotropic/nematic phase transition.

††

One of us (P.D.) did observe some phase separation in a couple of laponite samples and mentioned it in ref. 23. However, as in the case of Langmuir's experiments (19), the observation was not reproducible, and none of us working with laponite samples have observed such a phase separation since.

References

  • 1.Barnes PM, Nicol A, Harrison T. Geol Soc Am Bull. 2002;114:1379–1405. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Saffer DM, Frye KM, Marone C, Mair K. Geophys Res Lett. 2001;28:2297–2300. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mochozuki K, Nakamura M, Kasahara J, Hino R, Nishino M, Kuwano A, Nakamura Y, Yamada T, Shinohara M, Sato T, et al. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2005;110:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Matsuda T, Omura K, Ikeda R, Arai T, Kobayashi K, Shimada K, Tanaka H, Tomita T, Hirano S. Tectonophysics. 2004;378:143–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Biscontin G, Pestana JM, Nadim F. Mar Geol. 2004;203:341–354. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wan YS, Kwong J. Eng Geol. 2002;65:293–303. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hungr O, Evans SG, Bovis MJ, Hutchinson JN. Environ Eng Geosci. 2001;7:221–238. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kerle N, de Vries BV, Oppenheimer C. Bull Volcanol. 2003;65:331–345. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Waythomas CF, Miller TP, Beget JE. J Volcanol Geotherm Res. 2000;104:97–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coussot P, Nguyen QD, Huynh HT, Bonn D. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;88:175501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.175501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abou B, Bonn D, Meunier J. J Rheol. 2003;47:979–988. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bandyopadhyay R, Liang D, Yardimci H, Sessoms DA, Borthwick MA, Mochrie SGJ, Harden JL, Leheny RL. Phys Rev Lett. 2004;93:228302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.228302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bekkour K, Leyama M, Benchabane A, Scrivener O. J Rheol. 2005;49:1329–1345. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Martin C, Pignon F, Piau JM, Magnin A, Lindner P, Cabane B. Phys Rev E. 2002;66:021401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.021401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Knaebel A, Bellour M, Munch JP, Viasnoff V, Lequeux F, Harden JL. Phys Rev E. 2003;67:031405. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.031405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Davidson P, Gabriel JCP. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2005;9:377–383. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kajiwara K, Donkai N, Hiragi Y, Inagaki H. Makromol Chem. 1986;187:2883–2893. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang ZX, Van Duijneveldt JS. J Chem Phys. 2006;124:15910. doi: 10.1063/1.2185642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Langmuir I. J Chem Phys. 1938;6:873–896. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van der Beek D, Lekkerkerker HNW. Europhys Lett. 2003;61:702–707. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Michot LJ, Bihannic I, Porsch K, Maddi S, Baravian C, Mougel J, Levitz P. Langmuir. 2004;20:10829–10837. doi: 10.1021/la0489108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mourchid A, Delville A, Lambard J, Lécolier E, Levitz P. Langmuir. 1995;11:1942–1950. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gabriel JCP, Sanchez C, Davidson P. J Phys Chem. 1996;100:11139–11143. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lemaire BJ, Panine P, Gabriel JCP, Davidson P. Europhys Lett. 2002;59:55–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Keeling JM, Raven MD, Gates WP. Clays Clay Min. 2000;48:537–548. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gates WP, Slade PG, Manceau A, Lanson B. Clays Clay Min. 2002;50:223–239. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Van der Beek D, Lekkerkerker HNW. Langmuir. 2004;20:8582–8586. doi: 10.1021/la049455i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Srajer G, Fraden S, Meyer RB. Phys Rev A. 1989;39:4828–4834. doi: 10.1103/physreva.39.4828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fraden S, Maret G, Caspar DLD, Meyer RB. Phys Rev Lett. 1989;63:2068. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bates MA, Frenkel D. J Chem Phys. 1999;110:6553–6559. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gabriel JCP, Camerel F, Lemaire BJ, Desvaux H, Davidson P, Batail P. Nature. 2001;413:504–508. doi: 10.1038/35097046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu S, Zhang J, Wang N, Liu W, Zhang C, Sun D. Chem Mater. 2003;15:3240–3241. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ramsay JDF, Lindner P. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans. 1993;89:4207–4214. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES