Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
editorial
. 2000 Jan;108(1):A10–A11. doi: 10.1289/ehp.108-a10

Centers needed to study women's environmental health.

M C Hatch
PMCID: PMC1637862  PMID: 10620529

Abstract

The view of women as primarily fecund beings goes back to prehistory, where it is expressed in the well-known series of Venuses--stone figures of women with enlarged breasts, who are often represented as pregnant. Although the Venus figures date from the late Paleolithic era, this view of women did not change much in the next 20,000 years. With the approaching millennium, however, the field of health research has begun to consider women apart from their children or prospective progeny. Reflecting this shift in viewpoint, funds for research on the environmental health of women have now become available. However, no coordinated program has been launched on the scale of the newly established Centers for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research (1). Should women, like children, be the focus of a concerted research effort?

Full text

PDF
A10

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cannon J. G., St Pierre B. A. Gender differences in host defense mechanisms. J Psychiatr Res. 1997 Jan-Feb;31(1):99–113. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(96)00055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carroquino M. J., Galson S. K., Licht J., Amler R. W., Perera F. P., Claxton L. D., Landrigan P. J. The U.S. EPA Conference on Preventable Causes of Cancer in Children: a research agenda. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Jun;106 (Suppl 3):867–873. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chesney M. A., Ozer E. M. Women and health: in search of a paradigm. Womens Health. 1995 Spring;1(1):3–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Helzlsouer K. J., Alberg A. J., Huang H. Y., Hoffman S. C., Strickland P. T., Brock J. W., Burse V. W., Needham L. L., Bell D. A., Lavigne J. A. Serum concentrations of organochlorine compounds and the subsequent development of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Jun;8(6):525–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Landi M. T., Consonni D., Patterson D. G., Jr, Needham L. L., Lucier G., Brambilla P., Cazzaniga M. A., Mocarelli P., Pesatori A. C., Bertazzi P. A. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin plasma levels in Seveso 20 years after the accident. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 May;106(5):273–277. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Malmström M., Sundquist J., Johansson S. E. Neighborhood environment and self-reported health status: a multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health. 1999 Aug;89(8):1181–1186. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.8.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Perera F. P. Environment and cancer: who are susceptible? Science. 1997 Nov 7;278(5340):1068–1073. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5340.1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rier S. E., Martin D. C., Bowman R. E., Dmowski W. P., Becker J. L. Endometriosis in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) following chronic exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1993 Nov;21(4):433–441. doi: 10.1006/faat.1993.1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES