Abstract
Numerous investigations have been carried out on the possible impact of the Chernobyl accident on the prevalence of anomalies at birth and on perinatal mortality. In many cases the studies were aimed at the detection of differences of pregnancy outcome measurements between regions or time periods. Most authors conclude that there is no evidence of a detrimental physical effect on congenital anomalies or other outcomes of pregnancy following the accident. In this paper, we report on statistical analyses of time trends of perinatal mortality in Germany. Our main intention is to investigate whether perinatal mortality, as reflected in official records, was increased in 1987 as a possible effect of the Chernobyl accident. We show that, in Germany as a whole, there was a significantly elevated perinatal mortality proportion in 1987 as compared to the trend function. The increase is 4.8% (p = 0.0046) of the expected perinatal death proportion for 1987. Even more pronounced levels of 8.2% (p = 0. 0458) and 8.5% (p = 0.0702) may be found in the higher contaminated areas of the former German Democratic Republic (GDR), including West Berlin, and of Bavaria, respectively. To investigate the impact of statistical models on results, we applied three standard regression techniques. The observed significant increase in 1987 is independent of the statistical model used. Stillbirth proportions show essentially the same behavior as perinatal death proportions, but the results for all of Germany are nonsignificant due to the smaller numbers involved. Analysis of the association of stillbirth proportions with the (137)Cs deposition on a district level in Bavaria discloses a significant relationship. Our results are in contrast to those of many analyses of the health consequences of the Chernobyl accident and contradict the present radiobiologic knowledge. As we are dealing with highly aggregated data, other causes or artifacts may explain the observed effects. Hence, the findings should be interpreted with caution, and further independent evidence should be sought.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Buzhievskaya T. I., Tchaikovskaya T. L., Demidova G. G., Koblyanskaya G. N. Selective monitoring for a Chernobyl effect on pregnancy outcome in Kiev, 1969-1989. Hum Biol. 1995 Aug;67(4):657–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grosche B., Irl C., Schoetzau A., van Santen E. Perinatal mortality in Bavaria, Germany, after the Chernobyl reactor accident. Radiat Environ Biophys. 1997 Jun;36(2):129–136. doi: 10.1007/s004110050064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harjulehto T., Aro T., Rita H., Rytömaa T., Saxén L. The accident at Chernobyl and outcome of pregnancy in Finland. BMJ. 1989 Apr 15;298(6679):995–997. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6679.995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harjulehto T., Rahola T., Suomela M., Arvela H., Saxén L. Pregnancy outcome in Finland after the Chernobyl accident. Biomed Pharmacother. 1991;45(6):263–266. doi: 10.1016/0753-3322(91)90027-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Infant mortality after Chernobyl. Lancet. 1990 Jan 20;335(8682):161–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kellerer A. M. Fallacies of numerology. Radiat Environ Biophys. 1998 Feb;36(4):215–216. doi: 10.1007/s004110050074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kulakov V. I., Sokur T. N., Volobuev A. I., Tzibulskaya I. S., Malisheva V. A., Zikin B. I., Ezova L. C., Belyaeva L. A., Bonartzev P. D., Speranskaya N. V. Female reproductive function in areas affected by radiation after the Chernobyl power station accident. Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Jul;101 (Suppl 2):117–123. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s2117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little J. The Chernobyl accident, congenital anomalies and other reproductive outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1993 Apr;7(2):121–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1993.tb00388.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lüning G., Scheer J., Schmidt M., Ziggel H. Early infant mortality in West Germany before and after Chernobyl. Lancet. 1989 Nov 4;2(8671):1081–1083. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91091-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petridou E., Trichopoulos D., Dessypris N., Flytzani V., Haidas S., Kalmanti M., Koliouskas D., Kosmidis H., Piperopoulou F., Tzortzatou F. Infant leukaemia after in utero exposure to radiation from Chernobyl. Nature. 1996 Jul 25;382(6589):352–353. doi: 10.1038/382352a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petrova A., Gnedko T., Maistrova I., Zafranskaya M., Dainiak N. Morbidity in a large cohort study of children born to mothers exposed to radiation from Chernobyl. Stem Cells. 1997;15 (Suppl 2):141–150. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530150721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SCHULL W. J., NEEL J. V. Radiation and the sex ratio in man. Science. 1958 Aug 15;128(3320):343–348. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3320.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scherb H., Weigelt E., Brüske-Hohlfeld I. European stillbirth proportions before and after the Chernobyl accident. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;28(5):932–940. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.5.932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ulstein M., Jensen T. S., Irgens L. M., Lie R. T., Sivertsen E. Outcome of pregnancy in one Norwegian county 3 years prior to and 3 years subsequent to the Chernobyl accident. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1990;69(4):277–280. doi: 10.3109/00016349009036146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamazaki J. N., Schull W. J. Perinatal loss and neurological abnormalities among children of the atomic bomb. Nagasaki and Hiroshima revisited, 1949 to 1989. JAMA. 1990 Aug 1;264(5):605–609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]