Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 1979 Oct;32:311–315. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7932311

Methodological problems arising from the choice of an independent variable in linear regression, with application to an air pollution epidemiological study.

I F Goldstein, J L Fleiss, M Goldstein, L Landovitz
PMCID: PMC1637915  PMID: 540603

Abstract

In epidemiological studies using linear regression, it is often necessary for reasons of economy or unavailability of data to use as the independent variable not the variable ideally demanded by the hypothesis under study but some convenient practical approximation to it. We show that if the correlation coefficient between the "practical" and "ideal" variables can be obtained, then a range of uncertainty can be obtained within which the desired regression coefficient of dependent on "ideal" variable may lie. This range can be quite wide, even if the practical and ideal variables are fairly well correlated. These points are illustrated with data on observed regression coefficients from an air pollution epidemiological study, in which pollution measured at one station in a large metropolitan area (containing 40 aerometric stations) was used as the practical approximation to the city-wide average pollution. The uncertainties in the regression coefficients were found to exceed the regression coefficients themselves by large factors. The problem is one that may afflict application of linear regression in general, and suggests caution when selecting independent variables for regression analysis on the basis of convenience, rather than relevance to the hypotheses tested.

Full text

PDF
311

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buechley R. W., Riggan W. B., Hasselblad V., VanBruggen J. B. SO2 levels and perturbations in mortality. A study in the New York-New Jersey metropolis. Arch Environ Health. 1973 Sep;27(3):134–137. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1973.10666341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Glasser M., Greenburg L. Air pollution, mortality, and weather. New York City, 1960-1964. Arch Environ Health. 1971 Mar;22(3):334–343. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1971.10665852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldstein I. F., Landovitz L., Block G. Air pollution patterns in New York City. J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1974 Feb;24(2):148–152. doi: 10.1080/00022470.1974.10469906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schimmel H., Murawski T. J. SO2--harmful pollutant or air quality indicator? J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1975 Jul;25(7):739–740. doi: 10.1080/00022470.1975.10470136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES