Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 1997 Jul;41(7):1537–1540. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.7.1537

Evaluation of a flow cytofluorometric method for rapid determination of amphotericin B susceptibility of yeast isolates.

F Peyron 1, A Favel 1, H Guiraud-Dauriac 1, M El Mzibri 1, C Chastin 1, G Dumenil 1, P Regli 1
PMCID: PMC163954  PMID: 9210680

Abstract

A rapid-flow cytofluorometric susceptibility test for in vitro amphotericin B testing of yeasts was evaluated and compared to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) M27-T reference broth macrodilution method. The flow cytofluorometric method is based on the detection of decreased green fluorescence intensity of cells stained with DiOC5(3), a membrane potential-sensitive cationic dye, after drug treatment. Testing was performed on 134 clinical isolates (Candida spp. and Torulopsis glabrata). From the dose-response curve obtained for each isolate, three endpoints were calculated by computer analysis (the concentrations at which the fluorescence intensity was reduced by 50, 80, and 90%, i.e., 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50], IC80, and IC90, respectively). A regression analysis correlating these endpoints with the M27-T MICs showed that the best agreement was obtained with IC80. The flow cytofluorometric method showed good reproducibility with control strains. These initial results suggest that the flow cytofluorometric method is a valid alternative to the NCCLS reference method.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (152.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cormican M. G., Pfaller M. A. Standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Oct;38(4):561–578. doi: 10.1093/jac/38.4.561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fouchet P., Jayat C., Héchard Y., Ratinaud M. H., Frelat G. Recent advances of flow cytometry in fundamental and applied microbiology. Biol Cell. 1993;78(1-2):95–109. doi: 10.1016/0248-4900(93)90120-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Green L., Petersen B., Steimel L., Haeber P., Current W. Rapid determination of antifungal activity by flow cytometry. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Apr;32(4):1088–1091. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.1088-1091.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. O'Gorman M. R., Hopfer R. L. Amphotericin B susceptibility testing of Candida species by flow cytometry. Cytometry. 1991;12(8):743–747. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990120808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ordóez J. V., Wehman N. M. Amphotericin B susceptibility of Candida species assessed by rapid flow cytometric membrane potential assay. Cytometry. 1995 Jun 15;22(2):154–157. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990220213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pfaller M. A., Burmeister L., Bartlett M. S., Rinaldi M. G. Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Aug;26(8):1437–1441. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1437-1441.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pore R. S. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by flow cytometry. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Nov;34(5):613–627. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.5.613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rex J. H., Cooper C. R., Jr, Merz W. G., Galgiani J. N., Anaissie E. J. Detection of amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates in a broth-based system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Apr;39(4):906–909. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.4.906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rex J. H., Pfaller M. A., Rinaldi M. G., Polak A., Galgiani J. N. Antifungal susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993 Oct;6(4):367–381. doi: 10.1128/cmr.6.4.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES